skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Keystone XL Pipeline
Clean Energy Successes
Defending the Clean Air Act

Victoria Rome’s Blog

Too Much Direct Democracy?

Victoria Rome

Posted October 16, 2008 in U.S. Law and Policy

Tags:
, , ,
Share | | |

California voters face a dizzying array of 12 state initiatives this November in addition to regional and local measures that may be on the ballot.  The state initiatives cover a wide-range of issues from energy policy to animal confinement to criminal sentencing.  These and the other issues on the ballot are complex and would affect California's environment, quality of life and fiscal health.  According to polls by the Public Policy Institute of California, Californians value their ability to make state policy at the ballot box partly because they don't think very highly of their representatives in Sacramento.  However, many of us who work in the capital city see that all of this direct democracy actually compounds the state's problems by locking in spending formulas and poorly written laws along with many unintended, negative consequences. 

 

California is the only state that does not allow the Legislature or initiative proponents to repeal or amend a ballot measure, so once passed; an initiative can only be changed by another vote of the people.  Because there is so little chance to change an initiative, some that do pass are eventually tossed out by the courts.  Only 24 states allow voter initiatives in the first place and 11 of those limit measures that impact the state budget.  The Initiative and Referendum Institute has a map of initiative states.    

 

The November ballot has two examples of initiatives that seem reasonable at first glance but would actually run counter to their stated goals.  Prop 7 says it's about increasing renewable energy but would put the brakes on renewable energy development in California.  Read more from Craig Noble about why NRDC and every major environmental organization recommend voting NO on Prop 7. 

 

Prop 10 is another measure that claims to be about renewable energy but is about promoting one fuel, natural gas.  NRDC strongly supports policies that bring about a clean energy economy and reduce our dependence on oil, but Prop 10 would provide enormous subsidies, in the form of a $5 billion bond, to natural gas while leaving behind other options that are more efficient and pollute less.  Focusing on one fuel over other solutions unnecessarily adds more pressure to drill and is a poor investment.  Leading environmental and consumer groups, as well as the state's major newspapers join NRDC in opposing Prop 10.

 

But before you start thinking of voting NO on all state initiatives this November, there is one that would help California's environment and give us a world class passenger rail system.  Prop 1A would provide bond funding to build a high-speed rail line that will allow people to travel from Los Angeles to the Bay Area in about 2 ½ hours.  California's population is growing and is expected to reach 50 million by 2030.  And since cars and light trucks create a lot of greenhouse gas emissions, replacing car and plane trips with electrified train travel is a key part of the solution to global warming.  Prop 1A will help our economy too by creating hundreds of thousands of green-collar jobs in the construction and operation of the system.   

 

California's initiative process could use some tweaks.  Limiting the number of measures on each ballot might be a good start!  But for the coming election Californians need to decide how to vote on the 12 measures before them.  More on the three I've mentioned can be found on NRDC's website.

Share | | |

Comments (Add yours)

Earl KillianOct 16 2008 07:05 PM

A good source for proposition positions is:
http://igs.berkeley.edu/library/hot_topics/2008/Nov2008Election/endorseNOV2008.html

Here is a partial summary, with some additions:
1a. High-speed rail bonds
LCV Yes
LWV Yes
SC Yes
2. Farm animals
FCL Yes
GP Yes
LAT No
PCRM Yes
SC Yes
SJM Yes
UCS Yes
3. Children's hospitals
FCL No
GP No
LWV Yes
SJM Yes
4. Underage abortion notification
ACLU No
FCL No
LWV No
GP No
SC No
5. Expand post-prison services
ACLU Yes
FCL Yes
GP Yes
LWV Yes
SJM No
6. Money to fight crime and gangs
ACLU No
FCL No
GP No
LWV No
SJM No
7. Renewable Portfolio Standard
EDF No
FCL No
GP No
LAT No
LCV No
LWV No
NRDC No
SC No
UCS No
8. Gay marriage
ACLU No
FCL No
GP No
LWV No
9. Crime victim notification and stuff
ACLU No
FCL No
GP No
LAT No
LWV No
10. Alternate Fuel Vehicle Bond
FCL No
GP No
LAT No
LCV No
LWV No
SC No
11. Redistricting
FCL Yes
GP No
LAT Yes
LCV No
LWV Yes
SJM Yes
12. Veteran's Bond
GP Yes

Key to abbreviations:
ACLU American Civil Liberties Union
EDF Environmental Defense
FCL Friends Committee on Legislation
GP Green Party
LAT Los Angeles Times
LCV League of Conservation Voters
LWV League of Women Voters
NRDC Natural Resources Defense Council
PCRM Physicians Committee on Responsible Medicine
SC Sierra Club
SJM San Jose Mercury
UCS Union of Concerned Scientists

al loomisDec 10 2010 04:28 PM

initiative depends on a level of citizen quality. oligarchy depends on unfettered human character. i go with the 'wisdom of crowds.' at least you know they have some incentive to help the state, while politicians may simply be helping their lobbyists.

John LiffeeMar 19 2011 10:04 PM

Amid a Google search I ran across this post, and the title drew me in. I recognize that the subject of the post is in the rear-view, but am compelled to say:

Look, I have the same feelings about some of the things that characterize the current American political scene — I wonder if we're too stupid, collectively, for participatory democracy. Not inherently, but situationally — e.g. given current economic realities, in which too many of us work too much and are too mired in fear and misplaced rage to be able to intelligently confront the many complex and difficult problems we face.

However, from a communications standpoint, the title "Too Much Direct Democracy?" is about the stupidest thing I've seen from a progressive organization in a lonnng time. Framing the issue this way — "it's bad for the public to be making policy decisions" — in a public forum shows poor judgment. Anybody remember "They cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them"? Yeah, he was right, but how'd that play in Peoria?

Smarten up, folks.

Join the Conversation

Comment on this post:

All pertinent comments offered in the spirit of civil conversation are welcome! Off-topic comments, commercial spam, obscenity and other rude behavior are not, and will be removed. We are also required to remove any express or implied statement endorsing or opposing any political party or candidate for political office. Valid email addresses are required. (NRDC respects your privacy; we will not use, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.)

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Victoria Rome’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In