Efficient TVs Coming to California
Posted January 4, 2010 in Living Sustainably, U.S. Law and Policy
Working for an environmental organization I am accustomed to seeking out “green” products when shopping. This year I found several in unsuspecting places as I did my holiday shopping. Did you know you can buy a tricycle made of mostly recycled materials? We got one for my two year old.
There’s also this cool solar powered remote control car I got for my five year old. Anyone who has replaced the batteries on kids’ toys knows how liberating it is to have a great toy that doesn’t need batteries – ever! I found both of these at a major retailer. At many stores I find one section, albeit a small section, that offers environmentally friendly products that are either super efficient or are made out of recycled materials. There are cell phones made from old phone parts and recycled plastic, an idea that is long overdue given that most of us only keep our cell phones for a year or two. Even a recent visit to the eye doctor yielded a dozen choices of frames made from recycled material.
But what if consumers didn’t have to seek out environmentally preferred products? What if every product met a strong environmental performance standard? That day has come to California for one of our most central household products, the television. As my colleague Noah Horowitz wrote here and here, the California Energy Commission’s efficiency standards for new televisions mean that, starting in 2011, every television sold in California will be an efficient one. Conscientious California consumers won’t have to worry if their local Best Buy or Target stocks energy efficient TVs. The new TVs will be so efficient in fact, that once the standards are in full effect, California won’t need to build that new 500 megawatt power plant and will save almost $1 billion in the form of lower electricity bills.
The new TV standard doesn’t address every aspect of environmental performance; for example, there is no requirement for the TV to be easily disassembled for recycling. But for TVs, refrigerators, cell phone chargers and other products that meet energy efficiency standards, Californians don’t have to look for the one, usually tiny “green” section of the store to do their part for the Earth. And I’ll bet most people don’t know that their cell phone charger is regulated so that it doesn’t use inordinate amounts of power just by being plugged in to the wall. They just want it to charge their phone. That’s the great thing about efficiency standards. They nudge manufacturers to do better - to innovate so that their products use less energy with no tradeoff in performance or availability. Despite claims of “empty shelves” from the D.C. based Consumer Electronics Association, which has been fighting the TV efficiency standard for years, there are close to 300 models on the market today that meet the higher standard, known as the Tier 2 standard, three years before it goes into effect. For a list of the most efficient models on the market today go here.
My family is a bit behind the times when it comes to home entertainment. Case in point: we don’t have a digital TV or subscribe to cable so we needed a digital converter box when all broadcasting switched to digital last summer. But as my children grow up I can already anticipate repeated requests for a new flat screen television and a Wii or Xbox or whatever new game might come along. Video game consoles are due for development of energy efficiency standards because they consume excessive amounts of power when left on but are not in use. I’m proud that California keeps forging ahead with energy efficiency standards so that when we finally upgrade our TV or buy that new video game console, we will have a wide range of products to choose from and won’t have to seek out the little corner where they keep the efficient ones.
Join the Conversation
Comment on this post:
All pertinent comments offered in the spirit of civil conversation are welcome! Off-topic comments, commercial spam, obscenity and other rude behavior are not, and will be removed. We are also required to remove any express or implied statement endorsing or opposing any political party or candidate for political office. Valid email addresses are required. (NRDC respects your privacy; we will not use, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.)




Comments (Add yours)
Ginny from Cree — Jan 5 2010 11:02 AM
Thanks for this post, Victoria. Your last paragraph about video game consoles sucking energy when they're not in use made me think about this post I saw last week on EnergyCircle.com. Thought you might appreciate it: http://www.energycircle.com/blog/2009/12/29/vampire-power-check-comparing-energy-use-xbox-and-wii
Shelly — Jan 5 2010 08:18 PM
I am so excited to see the solar-powered car! It feels like every time I turn around we need to buy new super-charged batteries for some device around the house, and it's so frustrating that the rechargeables just don't cut it for the cameras, wireless mouse, etc. If we could at least go solar for the toys, it would be a good start!
Tom H — Jan 10 2010 10:12 PM
Great post! I just spent the last 6 years of my life working for a company that reviewed consumer electronics -- notably TVs, but lots of others.
It was clear that no one in the industry gave a hoot about energy efficiency -- it was all about "refresh rate" and 1080p and stuff -- all complete BS from a consumer standpoint (no difference in actual, visible quality). Yet meanwhile, screen sizes ballooned to 55", or bigger -- which is, frankly, a little obscene! We have a 26" LCD TV in our living room, and it draws probably 1/8th the power of one of these monster machines. But size and specs sell. My TV is now considered a cute size for a bedroom. Arrgh.
Today, technologies that drastically reduce power consumption without loss of quality (and, with fewer toxic chemicals needed for production) are available. A product manager given the choice between a feature a consumer might think they want ("more megahertz!") versus one that seems dull ("more efficient") is a sadly easy choice. Laws like the one in CA will force the issue, and consumers will end up with both.
I was also amazed at the measurements of XBox and Wii made by Energy Circle (http://www.energycircle.com/blog/2009/12/29/vampire-power-check-comparing-energy-use-xbox-and-wii) -- 300 watts is not a great deal in the large scope of the world, but for those of us who have switched to CFLs, or even better the great LED products, like the replacement down-lights sold by CREE, 300 watts represents a rather huge percentage of our consumption.
While I am looking forward to the day that electricity is nearly free (and costless), until then, hours of World of Warcraft and whatever else is out there today are only slightly better than cruising the strip with a 1973 Duster. Ok, maybe a trifle more than slightly better, but, well, maybe not.
Thanks for the great post, and the great work NRDC does (and that I support).
Tom