skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Susan Egan Keane’s Blog

How Clean Are Your Clothes? Pollution from China's Textile Industry

Susan Egan Keane

Posted April 11, 2012 in Curbing Pollution, Greening China, Health and the Environment

Tags:
, , , , , ,
Share | | |

More than 6000 water pollution violations from apparel factories in China – that is just one revelation in a stunning new account of water pollution from the Chinese textile industry, courtesy of noted Chinese environmentalist Ma Jun and his Green Alliance of activist partners. The violations included serious threats such as illegally dumping untreated toxic wastewater into rivers and streams.  And these are the just violations we know about! Given the general lack of enforcement of environmental laws in China, there are likely many more violators out there that simply did not make the official record books.

The IPE report comes on the heels of a well-publicized report by Greenpeace several months ago that also focused on water pollution problems in the textile industry in China. 

Clearly, with the publication of these two reports, the days of the ‘”anonymous” supply chain operations are over. 

Retailers and brands can no longer realistically hope that problems at their manufacturing facilities around the world will remain quietly local; the curtain is rising on these operations, and the public is becoming savvier about linking international businesses to the environmental problems they are experiencing from these factories. .

After nearly five years of work on pollution problems in China’s apparel industry through NRDC’s Clean By Design initiative, it comes as no surprise to me that some of these polluting factories are making clothes for well-known international retailers and brands. Clean By Design is an NRDC effort to work with clothing retailers and brand to improve environment performance of their suppliers. While many companies, including ones we’ve worked with, have made very public efforts to improve sustainability in their operations, we’ve seen that their reach into their supply chains is often not as thorough as it needs to be to make real change.

It is common for companies to have a business relationship only with factories at the “end” of the chain, that is, the ones actually stitching together the clothes. They often have little to no contact with factories further “up” the supply chain, that is, the ones who spin, knit, dye and finish the fabric before it becomes a garment.  Unfortunately, these factories “up the chain” are where the most serious pollution problems occur, because of their intensive use of water, energy and toxic chemicals. That’s where the action is, so that’s where any multi-national apparel corporate responsibility program needs to focus. 

It’s also where business decision-making needs to focus.  Sourcing departments in these firms must start to include environmental compliance as one of the factors considered when deciding where to place orders. Without these real business consequences of poor environmental performance, all the sustainability reports in the world will not make a difference. 

To protect their brand reputations, (and to make truly sustainable products), international companies must take much more aggressive steps to ensure that the factories that make their goods are not polluting the communities where they are operating.   Companies can start by mapping out their full supply chain, and checking for compliance problems by making routine checks of Ma Jun's database of violations and other public sources of information. If the factories have problems, the retailers and brands should require them to inform the public and to work to resolve the problems quickly.  Responsible companies need to walk away from places that are in chronic non-compliance with environmental laws.  To move even further ahead, the companies need policies that give their suppliers business incentives to go beyond simple compliance, and adopt innovative and efficient ways to make clothes that use less water, have a smaller carbon footprint and use nontoxic dyes and materials.

But requiring basic compliance is the most important first step in the right direction.

Share | | |

Comments

John EastonApr 13 2012 09:37 AM

Great insight Susan.
That's exactly why brands need to connect up with dye and chemical suppliers who know who is in their supply chain. DyStar has been doing this for many years and is now actively supporting brands through its Sustainable Textile Services program.
see http://www.dystar.com/Article.cfm?AID=56

MissPaulaRogersApr 16 2012 07:01 AM

While company policies can make a difference, it's a fairly scatter-gun approach.
What has made the greatest difference so far has been the introduction of EU REACH legislation and it's extension into other countries around the world, ..alas not yet to north america or australia, but funily enough to China.

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Susan Egan Keane’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In