Scientists say white-nose syndrome should be a research priority
Posted January 14, 2011 in Saving Wildlife and Wild Places
An Editorial published in the upcoming February edition of Nature Reviews Microbiology outlines the devastating impact that white-nose syndrome is having on US bats and calls for immediate, increased research into the causes of the fungus’ pathogenicity. Here at NRDC we have been advocating for additional funding resources for this type of research which is critical to understanding the nature of white-nose syndrome and how to devise strategies to limit or halt its spread. While there are a number of dedicated scientists working hard to unravel this mystery, any one of them will tell you that they are limited by a lack of funding to conduct the necessary research.
In the summer of 2009, some of those scientists testified to congress that they would need on the order of $55 million to address the top research priorities for white-nose syndrome in the next five years. Valiant championing for this cause by people like Senator Patrick Leahy (VT) and Senator Frank Lautenberg (NJ), resulted in $1.9 million for white-nose syndrome research that year – helpful, to be certain, but far below the scientists’ estimated needs. This past year fared even worse with no funding specifically set aside for researching this disease.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service has taken steps to recognize the threat posed by white-nose syndrome by dedicating staff to the issue and developing a draft national plan, but they are ultimately limited in their management options until we have the information we need to address this crisis. That means more research, more quickly.
It’s significant that the scientific community has identified white-nose syndrome as a top research priority and helps build the case for increasing the funding available for this type of research. As the scientists conclude in their editorial: “The damage caused by these outbreaks to ecosystems and animal populations is enormous and will have a knock-on effect on agriculture, industry and, consequently, human health. Therefore, investigating these outbreaks and the pathogens should be the highest priority this year.” We couldn’t agree more.
Photo by Tolka Rover shared via Flickr.
Comments are closed for this post.
Comments
christopher rohan — Jan 17 2011 09:49 AM
If we can communicate the far reacahing ramifications of bat decline to industry it may be our best best for private funding. What is the strongest tie to say agribusiness with bat decline? Is there something we can really showcase. The problem with bats and bees or other wild animal/insect is the insidious nature of the domino effect of their loss. Think big. Maybe a cute bat, like a Geico lizard, asking for help?
Deborah McMillion — Jan 17 2011 03:27 PM
We need to have more media coverage on this issue. People need to be aware of how our environment plays a crucial role in our existance. We also need to be very careful of who we vote for, environmental issues need to one of our priorities when choosing who we elect to be in our state and federal offices.
r sylvia tagert — Jan 22 2011 10:51 AM
My neighbors and I have been discussing the increase in flying pests and the amount of bites the local human and animal populations have endured and the transmission of diseases that impact us all. The descimation of the bat population and its environmental impact should scare everyone into calling attention to this problem. We can't afford to lose any of our creatures and especially the species so entwined with the preservation of the good quality of life we all want to enjoy and preserve.