skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Sylvia Fallon’s Blog

Sacramento Bee details the environmental consequences of federal predator control

Sylvia Fallon

Posted May 1, 2012 in Saving Wildlife and Wild Places

Tags:
, , , , , ,
Share | | |

In part two of a three part series that the Sacramento Bee is rolling out on Wildlife Services, reporter Tom Knudson focuses on the ecological impact of the federal agency responsible for killing hundreds of thousands of predators each year.  Specifically he looks at a project in Nevada where Wildlife Services has spent $500,000 over the last eight years killing nearly 1,000 coyotes and 45 mountain lions in an effort to boost mule deer populations.  The result? “It didn’t make a difference,” says one of the biologists tracking the project.

In fact, the removal of coyotes may have had unintended consequences that actually harmed the mule deer.  For example, removing coyotes tends to increase the number of smaller prey animals like rodents, which can carry disease and jackrabbits, which feed on some of the same plants as deer.  Last year, a mule deer in the study site tested positive for the plague – a disease that is associated with rodent outbreaks.  Also, one of the only factors that the scientists linked to lower mule deer numbers was ‘poor forage conditions’ (ie not enough food).  On top of that, with fewer coyotes to compete with and plenty of small prey to eat, the remaining coyotes dedicate more resources to reproduction resulting in larger litter sizes and before long the coyote population has rebounded or even increased. 

Knudson sums it up pretty easily:

“In biological shorthand: Kill too many coyotes and you open a Pandora's box of disease-carrying rodents, meadow-munching rabbits, bird-eating feral cats, and, over time, smarter, more abundant coyotes. You also can sentence the deer you are trying to help to slow death by starvation.”

And those are just the results in this one project in Nevada, but Wildlife Services removes thousands of predators across our landscapes all the time without anyone measuring the results.  In the past five years, they have killed an average of 256 predators a day.  As the article points out, “The body count includes more than 25,000 red and gray foxes, 10,700 bobcats, 2,800 black bears, 2,300 timber wolves and 2,100 mountain lions. But the vast majority – about 512,500 – were coyotes.”

Predators play a number of important ecological roles in their ecosystem, and scientists have known for years that removing predators disrupts the food chain and leads to a shift in the composition of species.  Recently, mounting evidence suggests that the removal of predators is one of humankind’s most pervasive influences on nature and has led to an overall ‘downgrading’ of our ecosystems.

At the same time, the main mission of Wildlife Services’ predator removal program – to protect livestock and boost big game populations – has shown itself to be largely ineffective, dangerous and expensive.  And as a federal agency, much of that comes at the taxpayers’ expense. 

It’s time to end this practice and support real and non-lethal solutions to livestock conflicts as well as build greater tolerance and appreciation for the complex role that predators play in maintaining diverse and resilient ecosystems that support all kinds of wildlife – big game included. 

You can send Wildlife Services a message from our BioGems webpage.  Then contact your representatives and let them know that you don’t want your tax dollars going to Wildlife Services’ predator removal program.    

                     

Photo credit: National Park Service

Share | | |

Comments

TDPMay 1 2012 07:46 PM

Where was Mr. Norie when poor Bella was caught? He should not let his dog run lose and out of control. I live in Idaho and there are leash laws. I am an avid outdoorsman and have experience with traps and trappers. My black labs have been caught in snares and traps while we are hunting. They have been released completely unharmed because I was with my dogs. Their safety is my responsibility. Bella would have to be caught a long time( many hours if not days) for a snare to cause that much damage. Mr Norie is as responsible for Bella's suffering as the trapper.

DSIMay 2 2012 02:37 AM

Thank you Tom Knudson for helping point out the idiocy behind this massive effort of trapping. I hope this will help turn the tide to show the futility of throwing money at bad ideas in the first place - for those who's bottom line is the dollar anyway. For those of us who know ecologically and morally this is completely wrong we need no more evidence, it's been out there plenty long enough.

As for RDP and your nasty remarks at Bella's owners, shame on you. What do you say about the domestic cats, eagles, and human beings that have been caught by these horrible traps? Just shameful hurtful remarks.

Oliver StarrMay 3 2012 12:22 PM

Wonderful and insightful piece that's a long time coming!

There's also a petition over at Care2 to defund wildlife services. Please sign and share!

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/378/318/356/us-wildlife-services-stop-waging-war-on-our-wildlife/

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Sylvia Fallon’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In