skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Clean Power plan
Safe Chemicals

Sylvia Fallon’s Blog

No scientific integrity for wolves

Sylvia Fallon

Posted February 1, 2011

, , ,
Share | | |

The Department of Interior today issued an updated policy on scientific integrity designed “to ensure and maintain the integrity of scientific and scholarly activities used in Departmental decision making.”  I’m all for scientific integrity and protecting scientists from political manipulation especially from an agency which has suffered from such manipulation in the past.  But the policy falls short if the same agency is going to continue to rely on unscientific and outdated recovery goals to argue that wolves in the Northern Rocky Mountains have long surpassed recovery under the Endangered Species Act.

I’ve written before about how the recovery goal for wolves in the Northern Rocky Mountains – a mere 300 wolves in the three state area of Idaho, Montana and Wyoming – was never based on science and has never been adequately adjusted to account for the developing science over the past 20+ years that clearly indicates the need for thousands of individuals, not hundreds, to maintain a viable population in the long term.  The Fish and Wildlife Service and its parent agency, the Department of Interior, has at times dismissed well accepted scientific principles on population viability and even ignored the inconvenient scientific opinions of their own chosen experts in order to doggedly defend their original, baseless recovery goal.

Because of Fish and Wildlife Service’s refusal not only to acknowledge the science behind wolf recovery, but to require the States to follow it once endangered species protections are lifted, we have had to go to court to ensure that one of the best endangered species success stories doesn’t ultimately result in complete failure.

This fight over wolves – which has now dangerously boiled over from the courts and into congress – is not as much about whether the current population of wolves constitutes a recovered and viable population as it is about whether the original recovery goal of 300 wolves – which sets the basis for state management objectives – is sufficient to maintain a viable population of wolves.  It’s not.  And anyone following a scientific integrity policy could tell you that.

                     Wolf prints

Image by mdd shared via Flickr.

Share | | |


BarryFeb 4 2011 04:44 PM

the only person who seems to be denying science is in fact, you. The claim of genetic diversity is nothing more than an new grasp at a straw to attempt to keep the cash cow listed.

Dr. David Mech, unarguably the most qualified and experienced wolf biologists in the US has already testified, under oath, of the fallacy of the genetic diversity claim.

When Isle Royal has been going strong for 50 years on the blood lines of 3 wolves, the NRM wolf population has no need for thousands of wolves. Your outcome and shallow study that shows otherwise has already been proven incorrect by Mech.

Keep grasping at straws, and don't complain when congressional action is taken to stop the continued overreach of those claiming manufactured science is the 'best available'.

Bob FanningFeb 5 2011 04:28 AM

trying to impose new "terms , standards and conditions" on the NRM in order to save their ESA / wolf cash cow.
"Genetic connectivity" was never part of the State Management Plans or the DEAL found in the Wolf Implimentation R...ules of Nov., 18 1994

Immer TreueFeb 5 2011 07:51 PM


Isle Royale Wolves going strong?

Immer TreueFeb 5 2011 08:09 PM


Again, Isle Royale wolves are going strong? Do a bit more research please.

Immer TreueFeb 5 2011 08:32 PM


Also from Mech in that same testimony

"There is no reason
to believe that there is not and will not be regular connectivity among the ID, YNP, and
MT populations."

I guess we will also have to just assume this will continue.

Comments are closed for this post.


Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit

Feeds: Sylvia Fallon’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In