New Report Says U.S. Birds in "Widespread Decline," Need Help
- Scott Dodd
- Website Editorial Manager, New York City
- Blog | About
- Posted March 20, 2009 in Saving Wildlife and Wild Places
Last spring, I found myself entranced by a pair of red-tail hawks building a nest in Riverside Park, just a few blocks from my apartment in New York City. Unfortunately, despite the efforts of their parents and the best wishes of many hawk watchers, the three hatchlings didn't survive, probably because of poison.
It's certainly not unusual for young birds to succumb to the many threats -- natural and manmade -- found in the urban wilderness. But this morning, on the first day of spring, a new report had me thinking of those baby hawks and their fate again.
According to an analysis of 40 years of data, bird populations in the United States are declining at an alarming rate due to climate change, habitat destruction, invasive species and other environmental forces.
U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar called the disturbing news a "clarion call" for action. "If we move forward with a new ethic of conservation, we will be able to restore bird populations," Salazar said at a news conference.
Nearly a third of the 800 species of birds in the United States are endangered, threatened or in decline, according to the report, which is the most comprehensive ever undertaken of birds in North America. But more than that, the decline of birds is a warning sign about the overall health of our environment -- or lack thereof.
Birds are literally the "canary in the coal mine," Salazar said.
Among the report highlights, as reported by Scientific American:
- U.S. grassland bird species have declined 40 percent.
- Birds in arid lands have declined 30 percent.
- 39 percent of U.S. birds restricted to ocean habitats are declining.
- Some coastal shorebirds are doing well, but many face habitat losses and dwindling food supplies.
- Birds in Hawaii face a conservation crisis, with many species on the edge of extinction.
Not all of the news was bleak, however. In some places where conservation measures have been adopted, bird populations are rebounding and even thriving. "We need to protect habitat and aggressively attack climate change with renewable energy," said John Flicker, president of the National Audubon Society.
One place where birds need protection right now is in Canada's ancient boreal forest, where billions of birds -- more than half of North American species -- build nests and raise their young each spring. By the end of summer, they'll head south and snack onbirdfeeders in U.S. backyards.
For many species, the Canadian forest -- teeming with lakes, river valleys and wetlands -- is the only nesting place they've ever known. Yet as NRDC reported last year, attempts to mine and drill the Alberta tar sands for fuel are destroying and fragmenting this precious habitat, resulting in the loss of millions of birds.
You can find out more about the Canadian forest and take action to protect birds from dirty fuel development at NRDC's new Save BioGems site. My hope is that fewer birds have to face the fate of those three hawk hatchlings that I watched perish last spring.
Photo: One of the Riverside red-tails lands on its nest. By Scott Dodd/via Flickr
(bookmark or email this entry)




Comments (Add yours)
Bat Benevolence — Mar 26 2009 01:19 PM
"Unfortunately, despite the efforts of their parents and the best wishes of many hawk watchers, the three hatchlings didn't survive, probably because of poison."
Because of poison? What sort of poison?
"According to an analysis of 40 years of data, bird populations in the United States are declining at an alarming rate due to climate change, habitat destruction, invasive species and other environmental forces."
Is poison considered one of those "other environmental forces"?
More science, please.
Scott @ NRDC — Mar 26 2009 01:51 PM
Rat poison. Dr. Leslie Day, a naturalist and expert on the city's urban wildlife, told The New York Times that the parents may have fed the nestlings pigeons or rats that contained lethal levels of poison. That's a common cause of death for hawk hatchlings in the city. (There was some question about whether weather or other forces also played a role, which is why I said "probably" because of poison.)
Toxicology tests on the body of one chick by the state Wildlife Pathology Unit showed lethal doses of the rat poisons brodifacoum and bromadiolene in the hatchling's body -- although there's some question about how they got there, since the Parks Department says those two poisons aren't used in Riverside.
This New York Magazine piece goes into a lot of detail about the life and death of the hawk hatchlings -- and the mystery of how the poison that probably killed them got into their system.
Pollution, pesticides and poisons are indeed among the threats to U.S. birds, according to the report.
By the way, the Riverside red-tail pair appear to be back at it this spring in a new nest. I wish them better luck this time!
Bat Benevolence — Mar 27 2009 01:59 PM
Thanks for providing more science!
I'm an interpretive naturalist and community organizer in Ohio and screen writing by the non-environmentalists that surround me. Additionally, because my vantage point is mostly rural, I forget that large cities are often plagued by rodents.
It sounds as if organizing alternatives to urban rat poison which can harm not only rats and hawk hatchlings but dogs and children is in order.
I appreciate that you are doing what you can to make others aware of this situation.
Scott @ NRDC — Mar 27 2009 05:35 PM
There are indeed plenty of people in New York City and elsewhere worried about the use of rat poison and its impact on both human health and wildlife.
Marie Winn, author of the enchanting "Red-Tails in Love" (which got me hooked on urban hawks in the first place) posted about rat poison in Central Park recently on her blog, and the EPA is concerned, as well.
Thanks for your interest and the work you do in Ohio.