skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Susan Casey-Lefkowitz’s Blog

Quebec rail tragedy: a time to honor the victims and reflect on our energy future

Susan Casey-Lefkowitz

Posted July 9, 2013 in Moving Beyond Oil, Saving Wildlife and Wild Places, Solving Global Warming

Tags:
, , , , , , , ,
Share | | |

In a tragic weekend rail accident, tanker cars carrying crude oil broke loose and raced into the small town of Lac-Mégantic, near the border Quebec shares with Maine, where they derailed and several exploded, killing 50 people at an updated count from after this blog was first posted.

Our hearts go out to the victims of this disaster and their families. This is a time for grieving – for the people of Lac-Mégantic, for all Canadians, and for all Americans.

Americans and Canadians are neighbors. We are allies. We are friends. And when tragedy visits Canada, it touches our country as well.

Unfortunately, even as investigators work to learn what caused this terrible accident, proponents of the proposed Keystone XL tar sands pipeline are using this tragedy to press for their project. That is regrettable.

If anything, this accident signals the need for a strategy to reduce the risks and hazards of transporting fossil fuels, and an honest debate about a future that doesn’t expand our use of oil.

If allowed by the Obama administration, the proposed Keystone XL pipeline would bring tar sands crude from Canada to refineries along the U.S. Gulf Coast and, from there, to overseas markets.

It would drive expansion of tar sands production and use.

It would increase the North American carbon footprint, worsening climate chaos, while transporting huge volumes of tar sands crude through our communities, across our waterways and over our heartland ranches and farms.

There is a better way to secure our energy future. A better way for Canadians, a better way for Americans, a better way for both of us to work together.

The question before the administration is not whether tar sands crude should be shipped by pipeline or by rail.

The question is whether we will deepen our reliance on the dirty fuels of the past, those that contribute to climate change and put our people and property at risk, or whether we will invest in the clean energy solutions of the future.

There is no risk-free way to transport hazardous crude.

Every means of transport – rail, pipeline, tanker or truck – puts us at risk, as the horrible accident at Lac-Mégantic and the heartbreaking loss it has left in its wake so tragically underscores. 

As we struggle, on both sides of the border, to comprehend this disaster, perhaps we can honor the memory of those we have lost by working together to find a way to reduce the risk, hazard and damage that comes from our reliance on fossil fuels, and create a cleaner, safer more sustainable future for our children.

 

Share | | |

Comments

J. Singmaster, III, Ph.D.Jul 11 2013 01:31 AM

I have stressed on this blog and in e-mails to various NRDC staff that, if we wake up to making the SUN OUR SOLE ENERGY SOURCE, we will free ourselves from fossil fuels and nuclear energy AND ALL THE MESSES THAT THEY WILL KEEP CREATING. I urge NRDC members to start calling FOR MAKING THE SUN OUR SOLE ENERGY SOURCE. Contact the Sec. of Energy about this action as he sould be aware of it due to my sending his office numerous statements about this as being the one action needed for SUSTAINABILITY AND HUMAN SURVIVAL ON EARTH. Dr. J. Singmaster, Fremont, CA

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Susan Casey-Lefkowitz’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In