skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Sarah Chasis’s Blog

The National Ocean Policy Will Help Fishermen

Sarah Chasis

Posted March 22, 2012 in Reviving the World's Oceans

Tags:
, , , ,
Share | | |

Today the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, Oceans and Insular Affairs is holding a hearing entitled “Empty Hooks: The National Ocean Policy is the Latest Threat to Access for Recreational and Commercial Fishermen.” Unfortunately, the title of this hearing is highly misleading. The National Ocean Policy will help fishermen by ensuring important fishing grounds are protected from pollution and habitat destruction, making fishing a viable livelihood today and into the future. 

Shortly before the National Ocean Policy was established, a firestorm broke out when a columnist for ESPN.com spread the unfounded rumor that the policy would close off large swaths of the ocean to fishing. Almost immediately, columnists from around the country proclaimed that President Obama was trying to ban fishing, except the rumor was false. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association issued a response stating in no uncertain terms “The Ocean Policy Task Force has not recommended a ban on recreational fishing.” ESPN, after severe criticism from other outdoor columnists, ran a clarification that it was an opinion piece.

The truth is the National Ocean Policy will be GOOD for fishing. Agencies are tasked with helping preserve and restore important fish habitat, not to ban or curtail recreational fishing. Comprehensive ocean planning helps us address various stressors on fish populations – from habitat loss to pollution – in a comprehensive manner and puts fishermen at the table so that their voice is heard at the start of the planning process. 

The National Ocean Policy is a landmark policy that calls on us to evaluate all of the uses of the ocean –fishing, tourism, industry, military, energy – and identify how to manage these uses more sustainably. Instead of the current first-come, first-served approach to using our ocean waters, it calls for the development of regional ocean plans that would benefit us all.

The facts are:

  • The National Ocean Policy’s development benefitted from a robust stakeholder engagement process, which included hundreds of recreational and commercial fishermen and the organized sportfishing lobbies. 
  • A representative from the Regional Fishery Management Councils (the federal-state bodies tasked with developing fisheries policies) will have a formal role in developing the relevant regional ocean plans. This is in addition to the impact that fishermen will continue to have through stakeholder and public engagement.
  • The Obama Administration has commented that commercial and recreational fishing will continue to be managed under the same laws and regulations such as the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the Regional Fishery Management Councils and all relevant state and federal laws. There will not be a ban on fishing. 

The whole point behind this policy is to promote cleaner water, along with healthier and more sustainable oceans. This can only help fishing.

Share | | |

Comments

Zeke GraderMar 23 2012 02:29 PM

Sarah: I believe you're right in theory. The problem is we have within NOAA and some in the national administration that are promoting open ocean finfish aquaculture as well as new offshore drilling. Neither of these are sustainable and both directly threaten commercial and most recreational fisheries. The fear is that a national ocean policy will give these activities a leg-up and weaken existing protections, particularly our access to litigation, to stop open ocean finfish aquaculture and new drilling (which, by the way, won't do a damn thing for gas prices, but sure as hell will add to more ocean acidification).

Nils StolpeMar 24 2012 06:32 PM

Ms. Chasis -

President Obama's Ocean Policy will help fishermen to about the same degree that the NRDC has helped fishermen. It's all about control, and the mega-foundations are supporting it because they assume that with them in the driver's seat, as they are today, they'll have all of the control. An ocean controlled by the likes of Walmart, Sun Oil and Comcast. An ocean oligarchy for them and crumbs for everyone else.

PETER FLOURNOYMar 24 2012 08:33 PM

Hi Sarah -- I agree with Nils and Zeke (no surprise there). We had to beg for over a year to get the Councils' role clarified in this Oceans Policy bureaucracy. What should have been done was to add this policy task to the Councils and perhaps broaden their jurisdiction -- Councils already have reps. from commercial, sport, and rec fishing communities, the public, environmental groups, as well as the Departments of State, Commerce, Homeland Security, Interior, and native Americans. All that would have been necessary might have been to add DOE and FERC. Now fisheries is thrown into the mix, at the bottom. The regional groups set up by the President's Ocean Policy Council is as bad an idea as moving NMFS into Interior, where it would have to compete with ocean drilling, destructive mining, etc. I could go on - but . . . . . .

mary beth de poutiloffMar 25 2012 08:04 AM

Losing local & state control to the feds is a bad idea. Next comes Agenda 21 & we lose it to the UN.LOST Law of the Sea Treaty means losing America's sovereignty.

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Sarah Chasis’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In