skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Rob Moore’s Blog

Illinois Must Look Ahead to Anticipate Natural Disasters, Not Backwards

Rob Moore

Posted November 5, 2013 in Health and the Environment, Living Sustainably, Solving Global Warming

Tags:
, , , , , , , ,
Share | | |

Illinois has recently received approval of its “2013 Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan” (2013 Plan) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). This document is the state’s disaster preparedness plan, which estimates the future risk of events like floods, droughts, and extreme heat and lays out what actions the state might take to protect itself and its citizens.  But the Illinois plan fails to account for perhaps the biggest driver of future natural disasters — climate change.

illinois shmp graphic 4.jpg

Illinois makes the mistake of relying exclusively on historical data to estimate the state’s vulnerability to natural disasters.  This approach ignores the wealth of information about climate impacts that warns of more flooding, hotter summers, greater likelihood of drought, and more frequent and intense thunderstorms and extreme weather events.  When developing a plan intended to anticipate future risks, the state needs to look at climate science to see what the future has in store.

Below is a critique of some aspects of the state’s plan, including information on climate impacts that the state should be considering when preparing for future natural disasters.

Note: NRDC requested and received a copy of the 2013 Plan from the Illinois Emergency Management Agency, but this plan has not been posted on the agency's website, nor did NRDC have permission to post it.

Flooding

Illinois is no stranger to flooding. As the climate warms, flooding will become more frequent.  A recent FEMA analysis of climate change and the National Flood Insurance Program shows that Illinois counties can expect between a 40% and 90% increase in the size of areas susceptible to flooding by 2100.

According to the 2013 Plan, about 15% of the state’s land area (7,400 sq. miles) is already prone to flooding and 250,000 buildings are currently located in those flood-prone areas. Illinois has experienced $5.5 billion in flood losses since 1993 and the future price tag will be far greater as flooding becomes more frequent.

Climate change may have already made this kind of localized flooding more likely. Statewide, the annual number of precipitation events greater than 3 inches has increased by 83 percent over the last 50 years, and the amount of total precipitation during these events has increased by 100 percent.  As the climate continues to warm, the number of days with rainfall greater than 1 inch is projected to increase up to 30 percent by mid-century.

While major floods on the Mississippi and Illinois Rivers attract the national spotlight, floods are common in Chicago and its suburbs. Cook County has had 11 federally declared emergencies due to flooding since 1991. In those heavily urbanized areas, heavy rains overwhelm stormwater systems, causing localized flooding.   

The frequency of larger storms that cause this kind of flooding will increase, according to the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning.  Chicago can expect today’s “10-year storm” (4.47 inches of rain in 24 hours) to occur every five years by the end of the century and today’s “100-year storm” (7.58 inches of rain in 24 hours) will become the 50-year storm. It’s worth noting that Chicago has already experienced two 10-year storms in the last four years and three 100-year storms since 1980.

For the Chicago area, heavy rains of this magnitude also means trouble for Lake Michigan and the millions of people who use the beaches and rely on it for drinking water. Heavy rains combined with low water levels on Lake Michigan (see below) causes the Chicago River to “re-reverse” itself and flow back into the lake (as it did on April 18, 2013), carrying millions of gallons of untreated sewage with it.

As the state’s risk of flooding increases with the warming climate, critical state and local facilities will also be put at risk. According to a statewide flood hazard assessment conducted by researchers at Southern Illinois University and included in the 2013 Plan, there are 405 critical state and local facilities located in floodplains including waste-water treatment plants (146), potable-water treatment (33),schools (95), fire stations (48), and police stations (26) and communication facilities (25). It is important to begin planning ahead to determine how these might be protected or relocated.

The increased risk of flooding also increases the risks of levee failures. According to the 2013 Plan, only 10 of the state’s 124 levees in the National Levee Database were rated as “acceptable” and 28 levees were rated as “unacceptable”, meaning the levee has at least one structural or operational deficiency.  Illinois is not only likely to see an increase in flooding due to climate change, but also faces the prospect of flooding due to the failure of levees as well.

Drought and Dropping Water Levels

Illinois experienced an historic drought that gripped much of the Midwest in 2012. Average rainfall in June 2012 was 2.3 inches below normal (43% below normal) and 56 sites around the state had record high temperatures that same month.  The combination of low rainfalls and high temperatures contributed to a drought that took a heavy toll on Illinois farmers. In Illinois alone, farmers had insured crop losses of nearly $3 billion.   Last year’s drought was unusual for its severity but drought is something that parts of Illinois deal with regularly. According to the 2013 Plan, 25 counties have declared a drought emergency 15 or more times between 1990 and 2012.

Again, the state’s disaster preparedness plan relies solely on historical data to determine the severity and frequency of droughts the state should be prepared for.  But the climate science tells us that droughts are even more likely in the future.

While annual average precipitation is projected to increase slightly (2 to 8 percent) by mid-century, average precipitation during the summer is projected to decrease by up to 10 percent.  This would coincide with projected summer temperature increases of 5 to 6°F. Hotter temperatures combined with decreased precipitation could contribute to drier soils and more droughts. A report from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration found that the extreme heat seen in the 2012 drought is now four times more likely to happen than in the past because of climate change.

Similar to the risk of drought is the risk of dropping water levels in the state’s lakes and rivers. In 2012 water levels on the Mississippi River were so low due to the drought that barge traffic was impeded between St. Louis and Cairo, Illinois. On Lake Michigan, lake levels were their lowest since 1964, the all-time low. Lake Michigan has been dropping steadily since the 1970s and many projections indicate that lake levels will continue to fall as the climate warms.

Extreme Heat

One of the easiest to understand impacts of a warming climate is the increased risk of extreme heat.  But even here, the state’s disaster preparedness plan fails to account for, or even mention, the impacts of climate change on future risks of extreme heat. 

According to the 2013 Plan, Illinois currently averages 10 days at or above 90°F in the northern part of the state compared to just over 40 days in the southern part. In 2012, over 110 heat records were broken across the state. By mid-century, Illinois summers are projected to feel more like summers in southern states like Louisiana or Arkansas.

Extreme heat is not just an uncomfortable inconvenience, but a serious public health threat. In 1995, a heat wave struck Illinois that killed 583 people — 504 in Chicago alone. By the end of the century, an estimated 166 to 2,217 people could die each year from heat waves in Chicago, depending on how much our nation reduces emissions (Peng, et al, Environmental Health Perspectives, 119, 5 (2011): 701-706). Heat waves like the one in 1995 may occur 2 to 5 times per decade by mid-to end of the century.

As the climate warms, Illinois can expect to see the number of days exceeding 95°F increase by 10 to 20 days in northern regions of the state and by 20 to 30 days in southern regions by mid-century. And the annual number of consecutive days exceeding 95°F is projected to increase by 80 to 100 percent across Illinois. By the end of the century, the number of days exceeding 100°F annually in Chicago could increase by four to fifteen-fold.

It is important to anticipate these increased risks, as cities and towns should begin planning on where to locate emergency cooling centers.  The increased temperatures will also put a greater strain on electricity supplies, as people turn to air conditioning to bring relief from the heat.  The state should also be planning on how it will meet this new energy demand.

Conclusion

Preparing for natural disasters can no longer be just an exercise in learning from the past. States must also take into account new information on how climate change will affect the frequency and the severity of natural disasters and related changing weather patterns.

Relative to other states, Illinois does a pretty good job developing its disaster preparedness plan through the use of historical data.  But we know that climate change is occurring, it is already having an impact, and the science gives a pretty good idea of what the future risks will be — but these risks are not factored into the plan that FEMA recently approved for Illinois.

Even though the full magnitude of some climate risks cited may not be fully realized for decades, it is important that Illinois begin preparing for those challenges today. It is also important to remember that the projected climate impacts are estimates of average future conditions, so the odds of larger storms or longer droughts are slightly increased each year as the climate warms. 

In developing a disaster preparedness plan, states are supposed to anticipate a wide range of natural disasters they might have to respond to in the future.  Thinking ahead allows states and communities to anticipate problems and possibly avoid them, not just respond to them. 

Relying solely on historical data to gauge the risk of natural disasters means Illinois is only looking at part of the information available. Only by conducting a full assessment of climate risks can Illinois make proper use of scarce resources to prepare for the changing weather patterns and natural disasters of the future.

Share | | |

Comments

Michael BerndtsonNov 5 2013 03:14 PM

This is interesting. Maybe IEMA will just cut and past the 2010 report:
http://www.state.il.us/iema/planning/documents/Plan_IllMitigationPlan.pdf

The non mention of climate change in the old report is unsettling.

Because Quinn is a representative for Obama's executive order on climate change preparedness, I thought there would be something there, there. I Googled the keywords: obama, fema, climate change, preparedness. Now I can see maybe why Illinois politicians may want to lie a little low. Jiminy Crickets, there are a lot of anti government wackos out there in internetland. Given Southern Illinois' history of toothlessness and crazy, they maybe all be located down there. What is the survivalists beef with FEMA?

Gerald QuindryNov 5 2013 04:20 PM

Michael,
Is this really the place for gratuitous insults? Toothlessness? Crazy?

With respect to the O.P. content, the real problem is that we have short memories concerning past events, lack of imagination when we envision future events, and little or no discipline when it comes to resisting developing on the cheap and for the here-and-now. Disaster mitigation means, for example, not building residential structures in flood plains, or allowing existing flood plains to be channelized or paved over. Providing subsidized flood insurance at less cost than the actual economic risk increases the amount of such development. Finally, loaning (or giving) victims the money to rebuild on the same spot just guarantees a similar disaster in the future. It really is less important whether such future events are caused by climate change or not. Stuff happens, and there is little need to further justify sound practices to minimize losses. Historical data is more than sufficient to justify better disaster planning and mitigation. No climate change embellishment is required.

Michael BerndtsonNov 6 2013 10:17 PM

Gerald,

I'm not sure if you read the latest (2010) published report or not. The premise is climate in general and cyclical weather related hazards specifically. If the 2013 report doesn't include climate change acceleration, it will be a colossal waste of tax dollars. Not like it matter much since Illinois is so freaking in debt.

Regarding climate change preparedness. If it's good for Monsanto, why isn't it good for the residents of Illinois? Monsanto recently purchased a company called Climate Corporation for about $1 billion. So my question is that are we going to have to pay Monsanto for preparedness? Is climate going to be the concern of corporations with a histories of delivery such lovely chemicals into the environment as DDT and PCBs? Here's an interesting take on the deal from The New Yorker:

"WHY THE CLIMATE CORPORATION SOLD ITSELF TO MONSANTO"
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/11/why-the-climate-corporation-sold-itself-to-monsanto.html

Water supply is one of many critical issues where climate change becomes the driving force for natural hazards. Upstate (Cook and collar counties) relies on Lake Michigan for drinking water. That's about 8 million people. Lake Michigan is lowering in elevation, mostly due to an increase in evaporation. The cause of this is due primarily to less ice coverage. The volume lost to evaporation far exceeds the volume diverted by made made withdrawals. Not including climate change research into the preparedness for water supply to 8 million people is criminal.

Quinn's IEMA appointment, Jonathon Monken, seems exceptionally capable at defending Illinois from an invasion by Cheeseheads and Hoosiers. Given the gun culture that's becoming popular in methamphetamine America these days, maybe that's more important than natural hazards. His apparent understanding of climate change and potential effects on residents of Illinois seems lacking and negligent. Quinn I'm sure hasn't a clue about anything relating to science.

Michael BerndtsonNov 10 2013 12:32 PM

Here's some excellent information on Great Lakes water budgets. The author is Lisa Borre who writes for National Geographic's Water Currents blog. Bottom line per the 2013 article: evaporation.

http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2012/11/20/climate-change-and-variability-drive-low-water-levels-on-the-great-lakes/

http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/08/20/where-did-the-water-go-busting-5-myths-about-water-levels-on-the-great-lakes/

My take away is we'll have to better budget the water budget. The number of man made diversions is less than evaporation, but starting to add up.

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Rob Moore’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In