skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Keystone XL Pipeline
Defending the Clean Air Act

Peter Lehner’s Blog

The EPA and Lisa Jackson : What Stands between You and Polluters

Peter Lehner

Posted November 29, 2010 in Curbing Pollution, Health and the Environment, Solving Global Warming, U.S. Law and Policy

Tags:
, , , , , , , , ,
Share | | |

I met with Lisa Jackson last week, and I was once again struck by how forcefully she fights to protect the health of American families. As the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, she is helping make our air safer to breathe and getting toxins out of everyday products.

Still, it has become commonplace these days to bash the government and to question the service of public officials—particularly Jackson.

Yet attacking Jackson is like attacking our doctors and pediatricians. Congress charged the EPA with protecting our health, and like medical professionals, Jackson and her colleagues study the science and determine affordable ways to keep people healthy—instead of treating them after they get sick. 

And let’s face it: If the EPA doesn’t stand up for our health and set limits on the pollution that causes asthma, heart disease, and cancer, who will?

Who else do you think is protecting you? Do you think BP is protecting you? Do you think the American Petroleum Institute is protecting you?

Oil companies are protecting their own interests—that’s fine, that’s what businesses do. But our interests need to be represented as well.

Imagine if an oil refinery or a power plant was pumping toxic pollutants into your body—and you are left paying the medical bills and taking your child to the ER when she has an asthma attack.

It is extremely difficult for an individual to demand that a major polluter clean up its act. But Congress gave the EPA the authority to do just that. And Jackson uses this authority on behalf of you and me and our children.

Jackson first got into environmental protection because she saw it as a form of people protection. She grew up in New Orleans, the daughter of a postman, and studied chemical engineering at Tulane. During her graduate work, she realized that her training as an engineer could be used to clean up hazardous waste—or better yet, stop it from occurring in the first place.

But Jackson isn’t only an engineer or a public official; she is also the mother of two sons. She wants to keep her children safe from illness just like I do and just like every other parent does.

That’s why Jackson tells industry: you can conduct your business, but you have to do it without giving our kids asthma or giving our parents respiratory disease.

Some lawmakers think that makes Jackson an example of government overreach. I think that means she is doing the job Congress gave her. And the job we need her to do – because no one else can or will do it.

Share | | |

Comments

SteveNov 29 2010 04:27 PM

Peter - As Exec. Dir, I would have liked you to write a more comprehensive article. This really doesn't say anything about Ms. Jackson that most of us here don't already know.

What specifically is she doing, how long will it take, and who is trying to stop her?

Please continue...

Thank you,
Steve

Patrick CoffeyNov 30 2010 05:35 PM

The EPA has taken many actions to protect public health and the environment. Here are some I note on my Twitter site (twitter.com/Envirobama). EPA has -
*improved controls on benzidene dyes, HBCD, and NP/NPE's
*phased out use of the pesticide, aldicarb, a neurotoxin
*required cement plants to limit mercury and other pollutants
*is fighting industry - still - over dioxin
*ended use of endosulfan, a pesticide affecting farm workers and wildlife
*set new limits on sulfur dioxide pollution
*placed short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCP's) on chemicals of concern list
*is reviewing Atrazine
*made new rules about aluminum and magnesium fumigants
*is working to regulate perchlorates
*opposed Texas' loose permitting of industrial plants
*enforcing new lead air standards in several non-compliant areas
and is requiring GHG reporting for oil and gas facilities, and is requiring permits for new or expanding industrial facilities to reduce GHG emissions.
And these actions and more have all been taken in the last year. There has been considerable push-back from industry (and even state governments) on many of these measures.

Jim Bullis, Miastrada CompanyDec 1 2010 03:58 PM

Past EPA accomplishments, whatever the merits might be, do not guarantee competence in current regulatory activities.

We currently have a proposed EPA sticker for cars which would state the merits of such cars. On the face of this very sticker, the EPA repeals the Second Law of Thermodynamics and defiles the First Law of Thermodynamics.

This is discussed at length beginning with comment #119 at:

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2010/11/the-new-post-partisan-world/comment-page-3/#comments

It is impossible that a competent engineer or physical scientist could do such a thing.

Not only is this labeling in direct violation of Laws of Physics, it threatens to do great harm toreal efforts to reduce CO2, though undoubtedly it is intended to do otherwise.

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Peter Lehner’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In