skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Peter Lehner’s Blog

Gas Mileage Gains Move the Country Forward

Peter Lehner

Posted July 29, 2011 in Moving Beyond Oil

Tags:
, , , , ,
Share | | |

Today my colleague Luke Tonachel and I represented NRDC at the Washington ceremony where President Obama announced a triumph of American leadership, the single largest step we can take to break our costly addiction to oil.

By 2025, new cars and light trucks in this county will go about twice as far, on average, on a gallon of gas, compared with today’s vehicles.

The difference will save Americans $80 billion a year at the pump. It will reduce our oil use by 3.1 million barrels per day by 2030. It will cut automobile carbon emissions in half. And it will create up to150,000 American jobs, as Detroit shows the world how to build the next generation of energy efficient cars.

plehner_0729.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peter Lehner (l), Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., and Gina McCarthy, EPA Assistant Administrator for the Office of Air and Radiation

If you're as tired as I am of those naysayers and hand wringers who always seem ready to run down any solution that dares rear its head, this was the perfect midsummer antidote. It reminds us that this is a can-do nation with a long history of rising to challenge and embracing opportunity.

Power companies once told us they could not take the acid out of smoke stack pollution without dramatically raising the cost of electricity. Yet, once told to do it, they cut sulfur emissions by half at little cost. Oil companies said they could not take lead out of gas without huge increases in the price of gasoline. Yet, once told to do it, they did so without any noticeable price increase. Same story with seat belts and air bags.

All one hears on Capitol Hill these days is that America can’t do it – we can’t drill for gas more safely and keep the costs down, we can’t reduce toxic pollution from power plants and refineries, you name it.

History shows all these claims are wrong, or at least vastly overstated.

What was so wonderful about today was that the manufacturers, the workers and others all dropped the whining and agreed to do what's best for this country and our children's future. That's the real triumph here.

In fact our automakers - Ford, General Motors and Chrysler, along with Honda, Toyota, Volvo and seven others that together account for 90 percent of U.S. auto sales - worked with environmental groups, the United Auto Workers, state and federal officials and others to reach agreement on this historic goal.

On the environmental front, this is a giant leap forward. Our cars and trucks belch out 1.7 billion tons of climate-warming carbon dioxide emissions each year, accounting for 28 percent of our national carbon footprint. Cutting those emissions by nearly half is huge.

"So when your kids are biking around the neighborhood, they'll be breathing less pollution and fewer toxins," as Obama put it. "It means we're doing more to protect our air and water, and it means we're reducing the carbon pollution that threatens our climate."

Those reductions alone would make this a stunning achievement. That, though, is just the beginning.

Americans know that when we put ten gallons of gas in the tank, six are coming from Saudi Arabia, Russia, Venezuela and other oil-producing nations, many of which don't share our values or goals. Every day in this country, we send about $1 billion abroad just to buy imported oil, money we’d be better off investing in good manufacturing jobs here at home. And our men and women in uniform are deployed worldwide on missions that include safeguarding our access to these imports.

 With our economy, our security and our very future held hostage to crude imports, presidents going back to Richard Nixon have called on the nation to break our costly dependence on oil. Better gas mileage will help.

Combined with existing fuel efficiency standards that begin with 2012 models, the new standards for 2025 will reduce our oil use by some 3 million barrels per day by 2030. Over time, the White House estimates, those savings will grow to 4 million barrels per day, as older cars are retired and more efficient vehicles take their place.

That's going to save the typical consumer a whopping $8,200 in fuel costs, the White House estimates, over the life of cars bought after 2025, as compared with today's average driving costs.

Finally, achieving these goals will make the American auto industry more competitive at home and abroad, by driving the creation of the next generation of energy efficient components and cars.

We'll improve auto gas mileage, after all, by making our engines and transmissions more efficient, with, for instance, engines that shut down cylinders when they're not needed. We'll use more efficient power sources, like diesel engines that are typically 20 percent more efficient than their gasoline counterparts, as well as electric and hybrid vehicles.

"We're going to have to harness the potential of startups and clean energy companies across America," Obama said. "We need to tap into this reservoir of innovation and enterprise."

As the president spoke, I couldn't help but contrast the progress we've made getting more from a tank of gas with the seeming inability of Congress to perform what may be its single most fundamental Constitutional charge: managing the federal budget.

Getting this done required leadership, commitment and compromise from everyone involved.

We didn't first sit down - carmakers, union workers, environmentalists and others - in full agreement on all of this. And yet, with the president's vision to guide us, we worked through our differences and developed a plan that will serve our country and its people for decades.           

It goes to show how much we can accomplish, as a nation, when together we set our sights on a common goal and dedicate ourselves to its achievement.            

It's about doing what's best for our country, a nation that knows how to roll up its sleeves and get things done.

Share | | |

Comments

RacehorseJul 29 2011 10:06 PM

Back in the 1980's, General Motors got a famous NASCAR mechanic to build a car that would get great gas mileage. He did just that: 60 mpg from a Pontiac Firebird V6. GM pulled the plug. He sent the car back, but kept the engine. Lesson? Go to the engine experts and they can get anything out of a gasoline engine.

Gary AndersonAug 5 2011 10:59 AM

Great idea but when these "Gas" saving cars can pull a boat, I'll be more of interest....

Linda ZengenAug 5 2011 11:14 AM

This is a wonderful idea, there is a down side to this as well its going to take 14 years to accomplish this. Will the government give another incentive to individuals who should really retire their vehicles and purchase a vehicle that will not harm the environment? Or when are they going to make emmissions testing standard across all of the United States and make the rules a little more strictor when it comes to vehicles that are offendors.

RacehorseAug 5 2011 10:01 PM

One incentive (at least for me) would be a promise not to tax any alternative fuel: electricity, hydrogen, etc. Then I will buy a green car.
As far as "offendors" as you call them, I watched a '56 Buick with a huge V8, no catalytic converter or pollution controls pass an emissions test with a better score than newer cars.

Rob MarshallAug 7 2011 02:15 PM

I fail to see the value to this. The outcome here will simply be more traffic and wear/tear on the roads as people drive more. This is a flawed solution unless they can combine this with a drivers tax.

whatevaAug 7 2011 05:04 PM

Racehorse, can you please site the source for this NASCAR driver who rebuilt the GM car to get 60 mpg.

I just want to see the source to believe it.

On that note, I saw an add for a car in a 1980's National Geographic, some random sedan or something, maybe some asian model, I don't really know,
But it was advertised as 43 mpg highway. Better than a lot of cars today.

I am thinking that must be due to lighter weight from less luxury features or less electricity draw from the battery, or something.

BTW does using more electricity in the car decrease mileage due to the fact the engine recharges the battery?

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Send Me Updates About: Peter Lehner

As new content on your chosen topic gets posted, you'll receive an automated email via FeedBurner. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Feeds: Peter Lehner’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In