skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Peter Lehner’s Blog

Date Labels on Food Are Unrelated to Food Safety and Lead to Massive Waste

Peter Lehner

Posted September 18, 2013

Tags:
, , , , , ,
Share | | |

Forty percent of the food we produce in this country never gets eaten. That’s nearly half our food, wasted--not just on our plates, but in our refrigerators and pantries, in our grocery stores and on our farms. Much of it perfectly good, edible food--worth $165 billion annually--and it gets tossed in the trash instead feeding someone who’s hungry.

My colleague Dana Gunders has been exploring how, where, and why food gets wasted in America, from farm to store to table. One of the more surprising reasons, as she explains in a report released today by NRDC and Harvard Law School, is because of the inconsistent and incoherent way in which food is date labeled. Those “best by,” “sell by,” and “use by” dates that you see on food have nothing to do with food safety. They’re set by manufacturers, without federal oversight, and most often relate to what manufacturers feel is “peak” quality.

The date label on food does not tell you if your food is safe to eat.

Confusion over dates, according to a survey by the Food Marketing Institute, leads 9 out of 10 Americans to needlessly throw away food. For the average family of four, this could translate to several hundred dollars’ worth of food being thrown away every year—and in all likelihood, more money spent purchasing the same food again--simply because of a misleading date stamp. A senseless waste, when we’re all keeping a close eye on our household budgets, and when one in six Americans lacks a secure supply of food.

You might think the FDA, the federal agency responsible for food safety, would be overseeing food expiration dates. It does not. The FDA, in its own words, leaves date labels on food, except for infant formula, to “the discretion of the manufacturer.” The USDA, which oversees meat, poultry, and some egg products, also says date labels are voluntary. It does call for specific wording on a label, if a manufacturer chooses to use one, such as “packing” date, “sell by” date, or “use before” date. But the agency never defines what those terms mean or how they should be determined. So according to the federal government, a date can be there, or not be there; and if it is there, the manufacturer can decide what it means without any further explanation for consumers. Some state agencies do require date labels for certain products, like dairy items; others, like New York, have no requirements for food dates at all.

As a result of this hodgepodge of rules, the date on your milk might be a “use-by” date, a “sell-by” date, or a date with no explanation. If you live in Florida, your milk has to be labeled with a “sell-by” date, which means—well, nothing, if you’re a consumer. The sell-by date is usually a signal to retailers that the product still has shelf life left, which helps with stock rotation. Once that milk gets home, that date does not ensure that your milk is still good; nor does it say that it’s bad. It might be good for a week, or it might have spoiled yesterday because someone left it sitting out on the counter. The date can’t tell you that.

Our ineffective, misleading date labeling system is contributing to the very costly problem of wasted food in this country. Wasting food is a systemic problem that’s a serious drain on our economy and our natural resources. We use 80 percent of our water and half our land for agriculture in this country—and yet we’re throwing away nearly half of what we produce with those precious resources. We waste four percent of our oil producing, transporting, and packaging food that never gets eaten. Food is the single biggest item in our landfills, a source of the powerful global warming pollutant methane.

Overhauling our date labeling system is a straightforward, concrete solution that will reduce food waste. We need a reliable, coherent, and uniform food dating system that provides useful guidance to consumers. The words on date labels should have a standard definition across the country and across products. Labels should clearly differentiate between safety-based and quality-based dates. Manufacturers and retailers should have their own, coded system for sharing information relevant to food display and shelf life, rather than a “sell by” date that confuses consumers.

The food industry and the federal government can and should start making these changes today.

Have you been flummoxed by a date label recently? Take a picture of the date label on your food and upload it to our collection at FixFoodDates.com. When you upload your photo, you’ll help us get the attention of manufacturers, and also receive expert tips on food storage, as well more information on sorting out the date label mess. With better laws, more information, and smarter business practices, we can begin to reduce food waste and make our food system safer and more sustainable.

This post is part of our Wasteland series, featuring people, towns, businesses and industries that are finding innovative ways to cut waste, boost efficiency and save money, time and valuable resources.

Share | | |

Comments

Michael BerndtsonSep 18 2013 11:33 AM

The real waste is how we market food. Most people probably throw out food because it is moldy and stinks before reading labels. If you shop at retailers like Walmart and Aldis the waste is in packaging, delivery and storage. Every food item is bagged, boxed and branded. Is this for preservation or marketing? My guess it has more to do with branding and tie ins. For instance, macaroni and cheese(TM) or any packaged quick meal (an infinite amount of examples) seems to get tied in with movies or something else to promote.

I'm not sure how NRDC works with say General Mills and Disney, but there's a big chunk of waste right there to tackle before telling us to cut the mold off of the block of cheese or skim off the curdling layer on the milk in the refrigerator.

Mike JSep 24 2013 08:18 AM

Creating more regulation will lead to mountains of paperwork, enforcement, and needless costs. There is little evidence that it will reduce food waste.

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Send Me Updates About: Peter Lehner

As new content on your chosen topic gets posted, you'll receive an automated email via FeedBurner. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Feeds: Peter Lehner’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In