skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Clean Power plan
Safe Chemicals

Noah Horowitz’s Blog

Shoulda Gone to LIGHTFAIR This Year

Noah Horowitz

Posted May 18, 2011

, , , ,
Share | | |

The world’s largest lighting tradeshow, LIGHTFAIR International, is occurring this week in Philadelphia.  While I was unable to go to the show this year, I have been glued to my computer reading about new product launches, each more amazing than the one I just read about. Without a doubt, the theme of the show is new energy efficient bulbs. The new technologies are coming from leading manufacturers of lighting products that are showcasing bulbs in every shape, brightness level and price point imaginable. 

The industry is really racing to provide more energy efficient alternatives to the 125 year old incandescent light bulb.  A major catalyst for all this work is the new federal energy efficiency standards for light bulbs that go into effect starting in 2012 that will update the energy-guzzling 100-watt light bulbs (click here and here). In the last year or so, we have seen more innovation in this space than in the last 50 years combined. Below are some examples of the new light bulbs that consumers will soon see on the shelf:

New and improved incandescents - Earlier this year each of the big three lighting companies  -- Philips, GE, and Sylvania -- “reinvented” the incandescent light bulb and introduced new versions that use at least 28% less power to operate. These bulbs will comply with the new federal efficiency standards. We understand leading lighting companies like TCP, the biggest producer of CFLs sold in the United States, are hard at work at producing an even better incandescent that uses 50% less energy than conventional bulbs. 

Brighter and better performing LED bulbs – LEDs use around 80% less energy than today’s incandescent and last up to 25,000 hours (that’s 25 years at around 3 hours/day).   LED manufacturers have been working hard to make LED bulbs brighter, dimmable and able to distribute the lights in all directions.  At LIGHTFAIR several companies announced new LED light bulbs that only use 17-watt and are just as bright as the old 75-watt incandescent bulb. Here is a picture of the Philips EnduraLED which is expected to hit the shelf later this fall. Not only is this bulb super efficient but several of the key components are likely to be manufactured in the US.Lightfair blog.jpg

This week, I got a call from a colleague who was excited to share that lighting manufacturers had figured out how to make a LED that is as bright as a 100-watt incandescent. The news keeps getting better. At least three companies showed prototype LED bulbs that would replace today’s 100-watt incandescent and only use 15-watt or so.  These are being shown by companies such as Lighting Sciences Group, Osram Sylvania (bulb on the left) and a new startup company called Switch Lighting (right) which is showing this futuristic looking design. Lightfair blog 2.jpg

Longer Lasting and Improved CFLs – Not to be lost behind all the buzz about LEDs, lets not forget the little ole spiral CFL. CFLs continue to be a very cost effective energy saving option for consumers. Today’s CFLs are far superior to older versions and will save consumers $30 to $50 over their lifetime. Lighting manufacturers have also been working to extend the bulb lifetime and most of the bulbs now are rated 8,000 and 10,000 hours, up from 6,000 hours previously. CFL pricing has come way down and consumers can now find CFLs for $2 per bulb in multipacks at big-box retailers. In addition, retailers like Home Depot and Lowes have stepped up to the plate and offer free recycling for the bulbs.

Based on all the points of bright light emerging from Philadelphia, the City of Brotherly Love, this week, it’s clear that consumer choice will INCREASE as a result of the new lighting standards. Choices will include new energy saving incandescents, CFLs, LEDs and probably some new technology we have not even conceived of. Let there be light!

Share | | |


Tom LentMay 19 2011 10:31 AM

Lots of encouraging news on the efficiency front. How about the toxics front? Did you see any indications out of LightFair that the LED manufacturers are making progress on making LEDs with less toxic substances? (see for a review of some of the challenges)

ralphMay 23 2011 12:04 PM

This is serious and REAL and the US government has been working on it for 10 years.
Please take 15 min and explore the link provided

Andrea Rossi has given three demonstrations so far including with professors from Bologna University and the Swedish skeptics society and the Chairman of the Swedish Physics Union. This is an directory of Rossi efforts This is a link to the LENR site where detailed information about cold fusion efforts is available. The US Naval Research lab has been working on this with positive results for over 10 years and has confirmed it existence. Yet the major scientific magazines refuse to touch this issue since it was purportedly discredited by some researchers and an institution that stood to lose 10s of millions in funding per year in hot fusion. Government funded hot fusion systems have never produced surplus energy after years of research billions invested.

Rossi has announced a 1MW Cold Fusion facility to be opened in Greece this Oct. Still top line periodicals have yet to publish even one article. This will change the economics of the world lifting many people out of poverty and it will also threaten many vested interests.
"..Ampenergo was founded by Karl Norwood, Richard Noceti, Robert Gentile and Craig Cassarino. It is important to note that Robert Gentile was the Assistant Secretary of Energy for Fossil Energy at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) during the early 1990's. This helps confirm Rossi's claim that tests of the E-Cat have been observed by the U.S. Department of Defense and the DOE. It is very likely that at least certain individuals in the DOD and DOE are aware and interested in the Energy Catalyzer. However, their silence is deafening.

It is unknown if any military or secret government research is taking place, but there are unsubstantiated rumors floating around the internet of the US Navy using a nickel-hydrogen cold fusion reactor to power a submarine. Although the rumor is not likely to be true, if they have known about the technology for a couple of years, it is possible testing is taking place. Trillions of dollars go missing from the DOD budget on a regular basis, and the money is obviously being spent on something..."

Comments are closed for this post.


Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit

Feeds: Noah Horowitz’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In