skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Noah Horowitz’s Blog

New PS4 and Xbox One Game Consoles: A Mixed Bag for Energy Efficiency

Noah Horowitz

Posted December 18, 2013 in Curbing Pollution, Health and the Environment, Living Sustainably, Moving Beyond Oil, Solving Global Warming

Tags:
, , , , , , , , , ,
Share | | |

 Photo by Javier Domínguez Ferreiro under Creative Commons licensing)The Natural Resources Defense Council has just completed rigorous measurements of the power use of the newly released U.S. versions of the Sony PlayStation 4 (PS4) and Microsoft Xbox One. We found that the new models have made substantial progress on energy efficiency compared to their predecessors, the PS3 and Xbox 360. But despite these power-saving advances, the new consoles' higher performance and new features result in up to three times higher annual energy consumption than the most recent models of their predecessors. 

That adds up to a lot of energy every year. In fact, even if these new video game consoles became 25 percent more energy efficient on average over time – which we believe is possible – they would still use between 10 and 11 billion kilowatt hours of electricity annually once the new consoles have replaced the more than 100 million units currently in use.

This translates to four large power plants and over $1 billion in annual electricity bills. To put this into further perspective, video game consoles in the United States are projected to use more electricity annually than all the households in Houston, America’s fourth-largest city.

Thumbnail image for Projected Video Game Console EConsupmtion.png

Fortunately, a number of relatively simple enhancements can reduce this energy consumption by more than 25 percent. Here’s a summary of some of our findings and key opportunities, in advance of NRDC’s full report scheduled for release early next year.

The Good – To their credit, Sony and Microsoft have done a lot to make sure the energy use of these devices was not even higher. They use very efficient power supplies to minimize energy losses in power conversion, advanced multi-core chips that can throttle down power use when the task at hand does not require full power, and well-designed “auto power down” software so the device automatically drops to a lower power state after an extended period of user inactivity. The new models also allow for charging the USB controller and headset from sleep mode, eliminating the need to keep the console on just to charge accessories. And Sony and Microsoft each came up with an innovative energy efficiency feature: after 10 minutes of inactivity, PS4 reduces console power in Navigation mode while Xbox One dims the TV.  

The Problem – When you add it all up, however, the new consoles may still use up to three times more energy than their most recent predecessors because of a combination of factors: they use more power to play games and watch movies, and use that power over a longer period of time, particularly while in sleep mode (called Connected Standby) when you may not even be in the room or charging accessories, and in TV mode, when you use the Xbox One to control the TV.  

How much power do these new models use? – NRDC measured the power consumed by each model during active game play, streaming a movie, when the menu screen is selected (Navigation mode), and when the console is in connected standby or completely turned off. We found all levels are significantly higher than their predecessors. For example, the Xbox One uses approximately 40 percent more power to play a game than the Xbox 360, and the PS4 consumes almost twice as much as the PS3.  (Note: some of the Xbox One’s incremental power use is because of the Kinect voice and motion recognition device now included by default with the console.)

In all of the active modes, the PS4 requires significantly more power to perform similar tasks as the Xbox One. Although the PS4 delivers higher resolution images and uses a more powerful graphics processor, its power levels should be closer to the Xbox One. However, the Xbox One uses twice as much power as PS4 when in “connected standby” (called “Instant On” on Xbox One), the default mode most U.S. users will experience when they turn their device “off” unless they change settings to the Energy Saving mode. While in connected standby, the Xbox One is consuming all this power waiting for the user to walk into the room and say “Xbox on,” even if nobody is home. Both devices have a more traditional “off” state that uses less than 1 watt of power, but it is unlikely many users will get there given the design of the set-up menu.

PowerInModeChart.jpg

 (1) With Kinect and PS4 Camera installed

(2) With USB charging enabled

How much energy do these devices consume annually? – After applying a typical usage pattern to these power measurements, NRDC found the Xbox One uses more energy per year than the PS4 due to its very high connected standby power level, the mode where the boxes reside for most of the day. This “always listening” feature is responsible for almost half of the Xbox One’s annual energy use and consumes more electricity annually than the 50-inch TV to which it might be connected. Given Microsoft’s recent release of its “carbon fee playbook” about its leadership in the area of reducing company-wide carbon emissions, we anticipate the company will make it a priority in future updates for the voice recognition feature to use a lot less power when no one is home or likely to use the console. 

In addition, Microsoft’s business plan that seeks to make the Xbox One the media hub of the living room will likely result in increased hours of operation and console energy use. People who use this feature to watch YouTube videos, cable TV, etc., will have their console on for as long as their TV, which is roughly five hours daily.

EnergyPerModeChart.jpg

(1) Based on active use (playing games, watching movies and TV) of 2.9 hours per day for PS4, and 4.0 hours per day for Xbox One (assuming 30% of people use Xbox One’s TV integration mode)

Over five years, the Xbox One’s 250 kilowatt hours per year usage represents roughly $150 in electricity costs, enough to buy two or three new games!

What improvements are needed?

Launch models are more focused on working well than on efficiency. We expect upcoming hardware and software revisions to bring efficiency enhancements, but the question is how much and how soon. As we enter the holiday season, here’s our efficiency shopping list for Sony and Microsoft:

a) Sony to reduce active mode power levels of the PS4 closer to those already achieved by the Xbox One. Both use the same AMD “system on a chip” in their consoles so this should be attainable through system software enhancements with little or no hardware changes.

b) Microsoft should bring down the energy use of its consoles in connected standby. There is no reason they should consume over 100 kWh per year, mostly in the middle of the night waiting to hear someone’s voice asking the console to wake up.

c) Sony’s PS4 uses 8 watts of power in connected standby when USB charging is enabled. While this is a good feature as users can charge their controller and headset without leaving the console on and fully powered, laptops perform this function for only 1 watt and Sony should strive to achieve similar levels.

d) Sony and Microsoft both need to work toward bringing down the power needed to stream video or other media content. Standalone devices like Apple TV and Roku need less than 5 watts to stream HD movies – a whopping 15 times lower than PS4 and Xbox 360. This improvement is even more critical for Microsoft’s Xbox One due to its TV integration mode, which may result in the device operating for more hours and consuming more energy.

We are hopeful that Microsoft and Sony will implement these recommendations quickly, game on!

 

Share | | |

Comments

Tommy SchubertDec 21 2013 06:23 PM

Heck yeah! Thanks guys! Just turned off connected standby on my Xbox until they get this business sorted out! Power efficiency ftw!

Joesph RigdonDec 23 2013 01:49 PM

Did everyone evaluate their energy usage with all the devices used to facilitate and read this report?

While this saves me from sticking a mutli-meter up to an Xbox, its far from anything else than fodder to bring traffic to organizations setup for Eco-thuggery.

How can anyone honestly think that the connected standby energy of game consoles equates to environmental protection? Tommy, you've saved a whale now that Connected Standby is disabled, whatever makes you sleep better at night, or if you own an electrical contracting company!

Lets evaluate something, if you took every man, woman, and child in the world and stood them at arms length, they would only exceed the size of the City of Jacksonville, FL. Hardly an impact some people make about the choices others make, what about volcanoes'? Lets plug them up!

With that said, would it not be a better use of resources to actually go out and cleanup trash and appliances in our creeks and streams? When has anyone on this site completed that task? Don't answer, it doesn't matter, most people would rather put nice things online for others to see instead of actually doing something minus the recognition.

If you've ever seen a Lithium Battery Factory, the land around them are a literal wastelands, China comes to mind..

I am still amazed at anyone who "champions" eco-friendliness and expects Microsoft and Sony to magically implement software updates to cut a few watts must have been drinking lead based water chewing paint chips.

Unscrew a light bulb and put a mutli-meter on a florescent light ballast and then write a report. Reality FTW!

Tommy HDec 26 2013 09:19 PM

This article is misleading. The new consoles DO NOT use more power than the equivalent LAUNCH consoles of the PS3 and Xbox 360. The article barely mentions that the PS3 and Xbox 360 comparison is the "most recent" slim models of each console. And duh, of course the most recent models, that have been engineered to be smaller with a constant level of power over 8 years and have taken full advantage of Moore's law are going to be very efficient compared to new first generation models that have increased power significantly while actually keeping power consumption in line with the "most recent" models of the last gen.

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Noah Horowitz’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In