skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Meg Waltner’s Blog

Department of Energy Commits to Unleashing Delayed Efficiency Standards

Meg Waltner

Posted August 9, 2013 in Curbing Pollution, Solving Global Warming, U.S. Law and Policy

Tags:
, , , , ,
Share | | |

A coalition of 10 states and the City of New York announced today that the Department of Energy has committed to push forward four delayed energy efficiency standards that could save utility customers more than $3.8 billion annually once in full effect -- and enough electricity to power almost 4 million homes.

This is great news. Clearing the roadblocks for these long-overdue energy-savings standards will help the environment, the economy, and our wallets – all the while supporting President Obama’s climate plan to reduce carbon dioxide pollution.

DOE sent a letter to New York State's Attorney General and others yesterday committing to issue Notices of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) this month for energy conservation standards for metal halide lamps, commercial refrigeration equipment, and walk-in coolers and freezers, and for electric motors in November.  

The standards, which are currently seven to 18 months overdue in violation of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), would become final next year.

Standards are a “win-win”

NRDC has been among those continuing to push DOE to implement energy-saving standards, which are a “win-win” because they save consumers billions of dollars and avoid the need for new power plants that spew pollution, damaging our health and water while warming our climate. The pollution savings from existing efficiency standards alone will avoid 9 billion tons of carbon dioxide emissions cumulatively by 2045, equal to the amount produced annually by 1.8 billion automobiles – more than the number of cars on the roads worldwide – while saving consumers and businesses a net $1.1 trillion.

Yet, despite these benefits and Congress’ explicit deadlines for setting standards, President Obama’s endorsement of those deadlines in a 2009 memorandum, and the nation’s urgent need to reduce energy’s environmental impacts and costs to consumers, DOE had once again fallen behind on its legal deadlines.

As a result, a coalition including the state of New York; the attorney generals for Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington; the California Energy Commission, the corporation counsel for the City of New York; the National Consumer Law Center; and NRDC has been pushing DOE to act on energy-saving standards for:  

  • Metal halide lamps, which are used to light outdoor parking areas and roadways as well as in high-ceiling lighting in commercial, industrial and public places, such as warehouses and gymnasiums;
  • Walk-in coolers and freezers, which, as their name implies, are refrigerators and freezers large enough to walk-in to used for bulk food storage and often found in restaurants and grocery stores;
  • Commercial refrigeration equipment, such as the refrigerated and frozen food display cases in your local market and convenience stores; and
  • Electric motors ranging from 1-500 horsepower in size that can be used in any device or equipment that converts electricity into movement, such as a pump or fan.

Delays are costly

Without updated standards, these products continue to waste power leading to higher utility bills for all while harming the environment.  In fact, the delays from just these four products found in nearly every U.S. community already have cost Americans an estimated $2.31 billion in missed savings. Each additional month costs about $156 million.

The damage isn’t just to our pocketbooks. These delays have caused at least 27.7 million metric tons of unnecessary carbon dioxide emissions; each additional month adds another 2.2 million metric tons. That pollutes our air and water, threatening our health and increasing the risk of extreme weather events. 

The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) estimates that standards for the four products covered under the commitment announced today could cumulatively save about 5.8 quads of electricity through 2035, enough to supply all of the energy needs in the United States for three weeks, and slash 27 million metric tons of climate-warming carbon pollution annually, equivalent to taking at least six dirty coal-fired power plants offline.

And there’s far more potential out there. The Appliance Standards Awareness Project estimates that 700 million metric tons of savings could be achieved cumulatively by 2030 through standards set over the next three years, including the four in today’s announcement.

It’s heartening that President Obama recently renewed his commitment to efficiency standards as part of his climate action plan, and key members of his administration have echoed their importance. New Secretary of Energy Ernie Moniz has also pledged to get the standards program back on track.

The commitment announced today reaffirms those promises and represents an extremely positive sign of support for energy efficiency as our cleanest, cheapest “resource” as doing as much work, or less, with the same amount of energy, while avoiding the need to build expensive new power plants.

Much of the holdup on efficiency standards has been at the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), which reviews executive branch agency regulatory standards before they become final. OIRA will need to review these rules and others in the pipeline in a timely fashion to make sure they don’t get stuck in bureaucratic red tape.

DOE’s efficiency standards program has huge benefits for consumers, electricity reliability, and curbing global warming. We need to get this program back on track and keep it there. Today’s announcement is a great step in that direction. We will continue to watch DOE closely, however, to make sure that all the standards covered by the climate action plan are issued on time and will take appropriate legal action if delays persist.

Share | | |

Comments

wdAug 11 2013 02:31 PM

After reading the article, I don't know whether to agree or disagree. It's so much cheerleading that it's easy to just nod in approval and move on without much thought.

At our house, we've reduced our electricity and natural gas usage by half over the last 10 years. That was achieved without either political pressures or regulations as the driving force. While the idea of energy efficiency is one that motivates me, I'm not sure it applies to all. The alternative to approving proposed regulations is not a ruinous end to life on Earth. The alternative is the market and the market is not indifferent to energy efficiency. People are ready to invest their time and capital to live with less consumption of energy resources. I don't think I'm the only one.

Maybe it's a style issue or maybe it's preferring a starting point where the conclusion of the article has to be developed rather than presumed.

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Meg Waltner’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In