skip to main content

Natural Resources Defense Council

Switchboard

Melissa Waage's Blog

Study: Pollinator loss costs big bucks, could threaten java supplies

Study: Pollinator loss costs big bucks, could threaten java supplies

Pollination by insects, mainly bees, is worth $217 billion worldwide each year, according to a study recently published in Ecological Economics and highlighted in Business Week.  That's equivalent to 9.5% of the world's crop production. (And two-and-a-half times as much as the U.S. government's recent loan to bail out insurance giant AIG, to put it into perspective.)

Interestingly, the study noted that crops that depend on insect pollinators, like fruits, vegetables, and oilseed crops, are higher in average value than crops that don't, like cereals and sugar cane.   And the consequences of pollinator loss on consumer well-being (defined economically) could be even greater than the direct value of crops pollinated by insects.

But the finding that chilled me to the bone was the possible consequences for the crop category known as "stimulants." Because that includes coffee.

...the results indicate that for three crop categories - namely fruits, vegetables and stimulants [coffee, cocoa] - the situation would be considerably altered following the complete loss of insect pollinators because world production would no longer be enough to fulfil the needs at their current levels.

It's true...coffee needs bees too.  And, like millions of others around the globe, I need coffee to survive.

(Incidentally, the shade-grown coffee that many of us favor because it's friendlier to birds is friendlier to bees as well, attracting close to 10 species of native sweet bees and far more bees than coffee grown in the sun.)

Bottom line: insect pollinators feed us and enhance the quality of our lives.  But, in addition to colony collapse disorder, which is affecting U.S. honey bees, insect pollinators are in decline all over the world.  It's worth paying attention to their plight.

Tags:
bees, coffee, colonycollapsedisorder, simplesteps

(bookmark or email this entry)

Comments

Graham CliffOct 2 2008 05:43 AM

LAN (light at night) was predicted as long ago as 1994 to have an adverse effect on insect species. This was brought up to date in summer 2006 in Challenge magazine -
http://www.lightpollution.org.uk/dwnLoads/CliffSummer%202006.pdf
Professor Gerhard Eisenbeis said in 2006 that light at night "sucks insects from habitat areas like a vacuum cleaner". We are seeing the failure to listen to these warnings all around us. The 24 hour day has killed off nocturnal creatures. There are fewer whip-poor-wills and night jars today. Insects at the base of the food chain are well known to be in serious decline. Their predators now are starving. There is no mystery to the problem We are just "Blinded By The Light" - of the unsustainable 24 hour day.

Comments are closed for this post.

We close comments on a blog post when it's clear the conversation has moved on -- click on the tags (above) or on our homepage to see if we've got fresh news and views on this post's topic.

Clean Energy Common Sense

OnEarth: NRDC's award-winning magazine

Citizen journalism from the OnEarth magazine website

The End of the Tour But the Beginning of the Fight
by Rocky Kistner
The Arctic Circle: Science at the End of the Earth
by David Rothenberg
Road to Copenhagen: Fears Arise Outside Closed Doors
by Ben Jervey

Read more

Fresh Conversation

Feeds: Stay Plugged In