March (Wolf) Madness
- Matt Skoglund
- Wildlife Advocate, Livingston, Montana
- Blog | About
- Posted April 3, 2009 in Saving Wildlife and Wild Places
The NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament has been fairly devoid of madness this year. No Cinderella teams, few upsets, hardly any buzzer-beaters. Yawn.
March in the wolf world, however, was full of madness. On March 6th, Department of Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was removing wolves in Montana and Idaho from the endangered species list, but wolves in Wyoming would remain listed (even though wolves in the northern Rockies know state boundaries about as well as they do the rosters of UNC, UConn, MSU, or Villanova). This decision caught many by surprise, as it is legally and scientifically deficient.
The rule had originally been released by the Bush administration in January, but it -- and all other last-minute rules issued by the Bush administration -- was frozen by the Obama administration for further review. And because of President Obama's pledged commitment to science, many hoped the Bush wolf-delisting rule would be withdrawn following its review by the Obama administration. No such luck, it turns out. This move is on par with Chris Webber's calling a timeout with none left in the '93 final.
Following the delisting announcement came news that wolves in Wyoming had been tested for brucellosis and -- as expected -- do not have the disease. The testing was in response to concern that wolves could be a threat to spread brucellosis and a bill introduced in the Wyoming legislature regarding the same. Since this brouhaha over wolves and brucellosis was scientifically a non-issue, as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's wolf recovery project director for Wyoming admitted, it ultimately constitutes a Jimmy-V-and-NC-State-over-Houston slam dunk of lunacy.
Last week, the Christian-Laettner-are-you-kidding-me act of madness arrived when a story broke that a family in Washington is suspected of killing a wolf from the first wild wolf pack established in that state and attempting to ship it to Canada. How did the federal and state agents learn of the killing? A FedEx employee called the police to inform them that a woman had just dropped off a package that was leaking blood. The woman said the item being shipped was a rug. The authorities inspected the package and found a freshly killed wolf hide in the box. What an amateur. Everyone knows you get rid of all the blood before you ship the pelt of an endangered species to a foreign country.
It's finally April. Hopefully this will be a better month for wolves. Unfortunately, however, the wolf-delisting rule was published yesterday in the Federal Register. Because of this rule's flaws, NRDC and other conservation groups, represented by Earthjustice, will go back to federal court to challenge the rule. So much for April.
And as for the Final Four, I'm pulling for Michigan State, who is coached by Tom Izzo, who was born and raised in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, which is home to many wolves. Howl.
(bookmark or email this entry)
Comments are closed for this post.
We close comments on a blog post when it's clear the conversation has moved on -- click on the tags (above) or on our homepage to see if we've got fresh news and views on this post's topic.




Comments
peter skoglund — Apr 4 2009 09:05 AM
Hopefully when Obama returns from his European trip he will come to his senses and understand the real issues and facts regarding the wolf situation in the Rockies. as for the Final Four....the state of Michigan will finally have something to smile about this Monday night...go Spartans!!!
Egbert VonSeggern — Apr 4 2009 11:50 PM
I have watched this group walk all over the people of Wyoming like you are so much better than us and by this little smug article about basketball and wolves combined it just proves that your organization is out of touch.
Alot of us in Wyoming aren't watching or caring about basketball because the wolves are making it harder for some of us to pay the bills and maybe send our children to one of these colleges.
No matter what side of this issue you are on remember that peoples livelyhoods are at stake. Shame on you for being so glib.
Janet Stringer — Apr 6 2009 07:10 PM
Dear Egbert,
I'm curious. Are you a rancher? Can you give specific examples of just how wolves affect your livelihood? I think if you took the time to read some economic studies...perhaps some from those fancy colleges that you reference, you'll see that wolves provide an economic boon to the area. I agree that certain sectors of the economy are directly affected by wolves, but those are very small sectors. And before you go off and accuse me of being out-of-touch, and out-of-state, I'm a fourth generation Montanan who was raised on a horse in the backcountry. I've hunted and fished most of my life.
I don't see your logic in accusing Mr. Skoglund of being glib just because he makes an NCAA reference. Just for the record, in the bar where I hang out, it was PACKED every night of NCAA play. I live in Livingston (not Bozeman) and the majority of people who were watching were outfitters, guides, construction workers, railroad crews. I guess they're out of touch too because their not sitting at home stewing over how wolves are ruining their lives.
Unless you're a rancher, I honestly doubt that you can prove the loss of one single dollar as a result of wolves! And if you are a rancher, then you are well aware of the compensation programs that are at your disposal, and you're are well aware of the non-lethal forms of livestock management that exist. But I guess it's just easier to take out your frustrations on others.