skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Miriam Rotkin-Ellman’s Blog

New Study Sheds Light on Air Quality Impacts of the BP Oil Spill

Miriam Rotkin-Ellman

Posted March 16, 2011 in Health and the Environment

Tags:
, , , , ,
Share | | |

According to a new study, the chemicals that spewed into the Gulf of Mexico from the BP Oil Spill set off a complex chain of chemical reactions forming air pollution aerosols. Unfortunately these aerosols weren’t adequately monitored for at the time of the spill.  While this study did not look at the impacts of this pollution on the clean-up workers or onshore communities, it raises important questions about what Gulf communities were exposed to during the oil spill and shows the need for improved air quality monitoring.

During the oil spill, clean-up workers and coastal communities reported odors and respiratory symptoms linked to winds coming off the oil slick.  On shore and off shore air quality monitoring efforts failed to definitely identify the culprit causing these complaints.  See my previous blog for more information on the gaps in the monitoring network.  The findings of this new study suggest that part of the answer to this puzzle may have been the creation of tiny particles, called organic aerosols, formed when the chemicals in the oil interacted with the air over the oil slick.  These particles, less than one micron in diameter, contribute to the poor air quality experienced in many cities and have been linked to respiratory effects, particularly for vulnerable populations.

The study, published last week, in the journal Science, analyzed data taken from airplane flights over the Gulf in June 2010 while the oil was gushing to the surface.  The researchers combined these measurements with analysis of the make-up of the oil and modeling of how the compounds in the oil interacted with the water and the air to paint a picture of the chemical processes that transformed the chemicals in the oil into tiny particles that were carried in the air towards the shore.  The the air over the oil slick, as expected, contained a narrow band of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). However, there was also a much larger cloud of small aerosol particles.  These small particles formed when the compounds which evaporate more slowly (intermediate- and semi-volatile compounds) spread out on the surface of the water and interacted with the air. Clean-up workers in the offshore environment likely inhaled this pollution, and coastal communities may have also been impacted. 

Limited monitoring of these particles was performed during the oil spill, particularly offshore where the health impacts would have been the greatest.  On shore, the lack of comprehensive air quality monitoring infrastructure in coastal Louisiana - ground zero for the plume documented in this study - limited the ability to detect the impacts of this contamination.  The monitoring equipment did not capture spikes of pollution which would have been carried by onshore breezes.

This study highlights the need for more comprehensive air monitoring for workers and impacted communities in the face of oil spills where the air can hold more hazards than previously known.

Share | | |

Comments

Dr. James SingmasterMar 16 2011 01:13 AM

Speaking ol shedding light and more concerning air quality, NRDC seems in the dark as far ar being aware of the PCBs leaking into the air from fluorescent light fixtures at schools, homes and even its own offices. Ten or so articles by M. Navarro of the NYTimes have been published over the past month and a half on the ballast problem of these light fixtures in NYC schools. NRDC's Chemical List somehow does not even have PCBs, perhaps because it is afraid to have its offices checked.
By the way PCBs may be coming out from various caulks used in your offices and may still be coming out of the AC conduits from capacitors in ACs that blow out years ago leaving PCBs coating the conduits. And then besides breathing them, you may be drinking them as a PCB containing a caulk-sealant was widely used to seal drinking water storage tanks. Oakland, CA had a major mess with its water district have many such tanks indicated in several news reports in late 93 and early 94. Does this shed some new light on your air and water quality?

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Miriam Rotkin-Ellman’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In