skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Clean Power plan
Safe Chemicals

Meleah Geertsma’s Blog

Protecting Michigan Citizens and Communities from the Hazards of Fracking

Meleah Geertsma

Posted November 29, 2012

, , , , , , ,
Share | | |

We are glad to see that Governor Snyder, in his recent message Ensuring our Future: Energy and the Environment, acknowledges the significant public concerns around the impacts of hydraulic fracturing (or “fracking”) for natural gas and oil on the environment and public health. We agree with Governor Snyder that scientific analysis should drive the treatment of hydraulic fracturing in Michigan, and look forward to working with the state and the University of Michigan in their evaluation of fracking.

To that end, we’d like to point the agencies and University to a number of scientific analyses of fracking operations already undertaken by reputable scientific bodies:

  • Recent studies document the pathways through which contaminants can migrate as a result of fracking, and in one instance actual aquifer contamination is identified as likely caused by fracking. (S.G. Osborna, A. Vengoshb, N. R. Warnerb, R. B. Jackson, “Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing,” PNAS 108: 8172–8176 (2011); .T. Myers, “Potential Contaminant Pathways from Hydraulically Fractured Shale to Aquifers,” Ground Water. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2012.00933.x.; EPA Office of Research and Development, Investigation of Ground Water Contamination Near Pavillion, Wyoming)
  • Well-understood events can happen during the fracking process that in turn would result in water contamination.  Many of these events have in practice resulted in methane intrusion, including from (a) drilling and well construction errors (PA DEP consent decree; McMahon, P.B., Thomas, J.C., and Hunt, A.G., 2011, Use of diverse geochemical data sets to determine sources and sinks of nitrate and methane in groundwater, Garfield County, Colorado, 2009; U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5215; ODNR Report), and (b) fracking in areas where natural fractures and faults may cause complications that can result in well integrity problems (T. Myers, supra; URS Corporation, 2006, Phase I hydrogeologic characterization of the Mamm Creek Field area in Garfield County: Prepared for the Board of County Commissioners, Garfield County, Colorado)
  • Methane intrusion can and does contaminate drinking water, causing combustion risks. (S.G. Osborne et al.; PA DEP consent decree; ODNR Report)
  • Fracking narrowly defined as consisting of fracturing rock and injection of fluids is necessarily accompanied by a number of other operations, most notably transportation, storage, and disposal of chemical injection fluids and wastes. There are multiple incontrovertible incidents of contamination resulting from accidents and/or aspects of the process other than drilling. (gas well blow outpoor pressure management and spilled fracking fluid; contamination of surface water from leaking and overflowing wastewater pits)

Moreover, there are some common sense legal protections that we know right now are needed, and that need not await an opinion by a scientific panel. In keeping with the principles of participatory democracy that undergird our system of government, citizens must be given meaningful opportunities to be involved in rulemaking, permitting, and enforcement actions regarding natural gas and oil facilities that will affect their communities. Additionally, communities must be allowed to exercise their longstanding oversight of land use, water safety, and other public health protections to ensure public health and safety around fracking operations. No special carve outs should be given to this industry, especially considering the risks described above and the sheer scale of increased operations that are likely to be seen in the coming years in Michigan.

Finally, it is essential for the health, safety and well-being of the people of Michigan that the role and presence of citizen voices and participation more broadly be properly protected in Michigan law.  We are seeing coordinated efforts around the country to close off citizens’ participation and ability to represent and defend their interests, from refusals to disclose critical information to gag orders on doctors to constrained access to the courts. Such curtailments of basic citizen rights must not be allowed in Michigan. Rather, an open, transparent, accessible system, enforceable by the public, must exist to protect citizens.

In sum, Michigan needs a robust, scientifically up-to-date and forward-looking regulatory scheme for fracking that fully ensures protection of communities and the role of citizens in representing the peoples’ interests – and the sooner the better.

Share | | |

Comments (Add yours)

Michael BerndtsonNov 30 2012 11:29 AM

Excellent post. I hope something can be done with Michigan. Not even bid rigging by Chesapeake on State owned lands seems to stir up the residents. Western Michigan is pushing fracking to give coal fired power plants an alternative raw material for combustion.

Those are excellent sources cited. I read Tom Myers work and the others over the past several months. All well done and in line with after-the-fact site investigation and transport and fate modeling studies. The problem is these studies are voices in the wilderness - in regards to environmental impact of shale gas both above and below the surface. In a former life I worked in environmental consulting (mostly groundwater remediation). If environmental impact of shale gas exploitation was truly being taken seriously there would be a billion academic studies, a million Federal and State led studies and thousands of environmental consulting firms selling its expertise for site characterization as a service to Oil and Gas or regulatory agencies -on the subject BEFORE drilling commences. And my expertise wouldn't be needed.

Jerry PaquetteDec 2 2012 11:40 AM

As a landman i am sick and tired of all the negative and false press that is being published and that our industry does nothing or says anything to show and prove they are wrong. The other thing is that most of false stuff is being funded by the O.P.E.C. NATIONS and Russia as they will lose their customers and Americans are believing all this nonsense.

Michael BerndtsonDec 2 2012 12:21 PM

Jerry, as a landman I'm guessing environmental protection concerns of shale gas exploitation simply makes it harder to sell a lease. Henry Hill of "The Music Man" fame probably felt similarly when the good folks of Rivercity, Iowa became wise to his marching band uniform selling schemes.

I think an appropriate analogy would be a mortgage broker upset around 2007/2008 when it was becoming blatantly obvious that the entire housing economy was in a bubble, perpetrated by Wall Street bundling and sell mortgage backed securities.

I got to question the accuracy of your last sentence of your comment.

Join the Conversation

Comment on this post:

All pertinent comments offered in the spirit of civil conversation are welcome! Off-topic comments, commercial spam, obscenity and other rude behavior are not, and will be removed. We are also required to remove any express or implied statement endorsing or opposing any political party or candidate for political office. Valid email addresses are required. (NRDC respects your privacy; we will not use, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.)


Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit

Feeds: Meleah Geertsma’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In