skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Keystone XL Pipeline
Clean Energy Successes
Defending the Clean Air Act

Leila Monroe’s Blog

No real solution to budget woes, but closed-door brokering may overturn 40 years of coastal protection in a sweetheart deal for one company.

Leila Monroe

Posted July 23, 2009 in Reviving the World's Oceans

Tags:
, , , , ,
Share | | |

NRDC and nearly three dozen California environmental organizations strongly oppose a proposal - included in the latest state budget deal - to allow the first new offshore oil drilling in state waters in over 40 years.  The exact details of this deal have not yet been released because it was brokered behind closed doors by Governor Schwarzenegger and leaders of the Senate and Assembly.  Reportedly, the deal would overturn a decision to reject new drilling off Santa Barbara made by the State Lands Commission in an open and public process.  It would also be a major reversal of the Governor's long-standing opposition to any new drilling off our coast:

This is a terrible deal for the marine life, ocean, and beaches that are central to California's economy and natural heritage, but it also does far less than a known alternative to help the state out of the budget crisis.  If California's leaders want to use oil revenue to help balance the state budget, they should impose an oil severance tax.  Every oil-producing state, including Texas, Oklahoma, and Alaska, already has this kind of tax. If California passed the same measure, it could provide close to $1 billion in revenue this fiscal year alone. This dependable, annual source of state revenue makes far more sense than what's in the budget deal: a one-time $100 million advance from Plains Exploration & Production Co. (PXP). [PLEASE NOTE: information released after the vote on this deal revealed that this was not a loan, as previously reported.]

No California governor since the massive 1969 oil spill, either Republican or Democrat, has supported new offshore drilling in state water. This deal could set new precedent for additional drilling along the California coastline.

Share | | |

Comments

Brett WilliamsJul 24 2009 06:27 PM

Wow, a $100 million dollar loan (re: pay off) to allow oil drilling again! What a bargain for the oil lobby. This demonstrates how insane it is to require a 2/3rds vote for CA's annual budgets. It's the same amount of votes it takes to change the state constitution, while an initiative can change it with only 50% of the vote. A constitutional convention is starting to sound pretty good...

LeilaJul 24 2009 06:35 PM

Good news Brett, the State Assembly just passed the budget deal, but did not approve the offshore drilling trailer! http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/lmonroe/budget_deal_passes_but_new_dri.html

LeilaJul 24 2009 07:15 PM

PLEASE NOTE: information released after the vote on this deal revealed that this was not a loan, as previously reported.

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Leila Monroe’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In