Laurie Johnson's Blog
Archives
View entries: by date | by title
- A Heritage of Shame: The Heritage Foundation's Economic Analysis of the Waxman-Markey Bill (May 21, 2009)
- A lesson in math, science, and economics for Bjorn Lomborg (September 29, 2009)
- ACELA vs. Comprehensive Climate Legislation: Jobs, Jobs, Jobs (February 7, 2010)
- Another Incomplete Story by Climate Obstructionists: Waxman-Markey’s Climate Protection Bill, ACESA, Will Supposedly Devastate Missouri Farmers (July 16, 2009)
- Black Hole Swallows MIT (May 13, 2009)
- Boehner's Climate of Fear (April 3, 2009)
- CBO Analysis: Clean Energy for Less (September 21, 2009)
- Climate Legislation: Is 20 the new 17? (December 14, 2009)
- Contrary to the Heritage Foundation’s “New” Analysis, Climate Legislation Will Not Devastate Farmers or Small Businesses (July 22, 2009)
- Don't read the headlines, read the story: Climate legislation is more than affordable (October 15, 2009)
- EIA Study Confirms Climate Protection is More Than Affordable (August 5, 2009)
- EPA Analysis: Jobs and Household Incomes Increase Under Climate Policy (April 22, 2009)
- Eight Questions to Ask About CRA’s May 2009 Economic Analysis of the Waxman-Markey Cap and Trade Program (July 16, 2009)
- Interstate Differences in Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Much Less Than Meets the Eye (June 18, 2009)
- More good news for climate protection: Study finds benefits swamp the costs (September 11, 2009)
- NAM/ACCF: Distorting their own distorted analysis of climate legislation (September 10, 2009)
- Newt's Voodoo Economics (March 14, 2009)
- Seven Questions to Ask About CRA's April 2009 Cap and Trade Analysis (April 30, 2009)
- Seven Questions to Ask of Any Economic Model of Climate Legislation (April 23, 2009)
- The Historical Record of Job Growth and Environmental Protection: A Convenient Truth for Climate Legislation (June 18, 2009)

- Laurie Johnson
- Chief Economist, Climate Center
- Washington, DC
- I am Chief Economist at the Climate Center of the Natural Resources Defense Council in...
- more→

