Find NRDC on:

Home › Contributors › Laurie Johnson › Archives

Laurie Johnson’s Blog

Archives

View entries: by date | by title

• Keystone XL pipeline: Good for Big Oil, bad for the economy (February 1, 2012)
• CIBO's rehashed and discredited analysis of toxic emission standards (December 20, 2011)
• Making it real: new study shows exactly where EPA regulations create jobs (December 8, 2011)
• The coal lobby grabbed my inhaler: another junk industry analysis of EPA regulations (November 12, 2011)
• The high costs of fossil fuel dependency: climate change-related health and economic costs, and a costly dirty energy economy (November 7, 2011)
• Cement industry's junk economic analysis of EPA toxic emission standards (September 20, 2011)
• Pulp and paper industry's junk economic analysis of EPA toxic emission standards for industrial boilers (September 12, 2011)
• Smog in a fog: President Obama abandons the ozone standard, killing jobs rather than protecting them (September 7, 2011)
• Can't get “NERA’” to the truth: industry's disingenuous attack on EPA's ozone analysis (August 16, 2011)
• Climate change endangering public health; new interactive site gives state by state data (August 4, 2011)
• Pay Now or Pay Later III: report finds all states lose from inaction on climate change (August 2, 2011)
• Government vastly underestimates potential health and environment damages from climate change (July 25, 2011)
• Big coal attacks life saving regulations (July 18, 2011)
• NERA's flawed critique of EPA's analysis of the Clean Air Act (July 5, 2011)
• Representative Upton's anti-regulatory rant: when the evidence isn't there, misrepresent, distort, or ignore it (June 29, 2011)
• Pay Now or Pay Later II: report finds all states lose from inaction on climate change (May 16, 2011)
• Pay Now or Pay Later I: report finds all states lose from inaction on climate change (April 27, 2011)
• Obstructionists once again attack EPA, using the same fearmongering jobs argument (April 19, 2011)
• The Heritage Foundation's critique of EPA: What is science? (March 8, 2011)
• Gains from Clean Air Act: Bull Market Without the Bust (March 1, 2011)
• Congressional Research Service: CIBO boiler study used flawed economics (February 16, 2011)
• The Heritage Foundation's critique of the new Clean Air Act jobs study: wrong again (February 13, 2011)
• EPA sets the record straight! The Clean Air Act is a net gain to the economy, the environment, and public health (February 11, 2011)
• Protecting the Clean Air Act: Better Health, More Jobs (February 8, 2011)
• Industry Reports Attacking Clean Air Rules Earn Poor Grades from Professors (October 28, 2010)
• Pulp and paper industry's junk economic analysis of proposed EPA toxic emission standards for industrial boilers (October 1, 2010)
• Boiler industry's junk economic analysis of proposed EPA toxic emission standards for industrial boilers (September 22, 2010)
• Manufacturing and Allied Products Institute (MAPI): Junk analysis against protective ozone standards (September 21, 2010)
• Protecting the Clean Air Act: Getting the jobs and investment story right (September 13, 2010)
• EIA analysis of the American Power Act: modest household costs and dramatic reduction in oil imports (July 16, 2010)
• The "new" ACCF Michigan report: recycling old bunk analysis (July 9, 2010)
• Protecting our jobs and economy of the future: reinstate the moratorium on deepwater drilling (July 2, 2010)
• New study sponsored by the Institute for Energy Research (IER): more junk analysis from the well-heeled oil industry (June 30, 2010)
• The usual hysteria: a gas tax, a gas tax, the sky is going to fall (June 25, 2010)
• Multiple studies find comprehensive climate and energy legislation equitable, affordable, and good for the economy (June 16, 2010)
• Study finds American Power Act creates jobs while decreasing household energy expenditures (June 15, 2010)
• MIT study: income growth far exceeds household investment costs under climate legislation, and the poor come out ahead (June 7, 2010)
• EPA study confirms comprehensive climate and energy legislation is affordable, equitable, and effective (June 15, 2010)
• New study predicts increased employment, energy security, and household energy savings from the American Power Act (May 20, 2010)
• Analysis from the Peterson Institute: Why CBO's report on climate legislation will significantly underestimate employment gains (May 20, 2010)
• A second look at CBO's employment study: Climate legislation and a healthy economy can go hand in hand (May 15, 2010)
• The National Review: Your pocket-change or your life (May 6, 2010)
• Comprehensive Climate and Energy Legislation: More Jobs, Not Less (April 23, 2010)
• ACELA vs. Comprehensive Climate Legislation: Jobs, Jobs, Jobs (February 7, 2010)
• Climate Legislation: Is 20 the new 17? (December 14, 2009)
• Don't read the headlines, read the story: Climate legislation is more than affordable (October 15, 2009)
• A lesson in math, science, and economics for Bjorn Lomborg (September 29, 2009)
• CBO Analysis: Clean Energy for Less (September 21, 2009)
• More good news for climate protection: Study finds benefits swamp the costs (September 11, 2009)
• NAM/ACCF: Distorting their own distorted analysis of climate legislation (September 10, 2009)
• EIA Study Confirms Climate Protection is More Than Affordable (August 5, 2009)
• Contrary to the Heritage Foundation’s “New” Analysis, Climate Legislation Will Not Devastate Farmers or Small Businesses (July 22, 2009)
• Another Incomplete Story by Climate Obstructionists: Waxman-Markey’s Climate Protection Bill, ACESA, Will Supposedly Devastate Missouri Farmers (July 16, 2009)
• Eight Questions to Ask About CRA’s May 2009 Economic Analysis of the Waxman-Markey Cap and Trade Program (July 16, 2009)
• Interstate Differences in Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Much Less Than Meets the Eye (June 18, 2009)
• The Historical Record of Job Growth and Environmental Protection: A Convenient Truth for Climate Legislation (June 18, 2009)
• A Heritage of Shame: The Heritage Foundation's Economic Analysis of the Waxman-Markey Bill (May 21, 2009)
• Black Hole Swallows MIT (May 13, 2009)
• Seven Questions to Ask About CRA's April 2009 Cap and Trade Analysis (April 30, 2009)
• Seven Questions to Ask of Any Economic Model of Climate Legislation (April 23, 2009)
• EPA Analysis: Jobs and Household Incomes Increase Under Climate Policy (April 22, 2009)
• Boehner's Climate of Fear (April 3, 2009)
• Newt's Voodoo Economics (March 14, 2009)

• A Heritage of Shame: The Heritage Foundation's Economic Analysis of the Waxman-Markey Bill (May 21, 2009)
• A lesson in math, science, and economics for Bjorn Lomborg (September 29, 2009)
• A second look at CBO's employment study: Climate legislation and a healthy economy can go hand in hand (May 15, 2010)
• ACELA vs. Comprehensive Climate Legislation: Jobs, Jobs, Jobs (February 7, 2010)
• Analysis from the Peterson Institute: Why CBO's report on climate legislation will significantly underestimate employment gains (May 20, 2010)
• Another Incomplete Story by Climate Obstructionists: Waxman-Markey’s Climate Protection Bill, ACESA, Will Supposedly Devastate Missouri Farmers (July 16, 2009)
• Big coal attacks life saving regulations (July 18, 2011)
• Black Hole Swallows MIT (May 13, 2009)
• Boehner's Climate of Fear (April 3, 2009)
• Boiler industry's junk economic analysis of proposed EPA toxic emission standards for industrial boilers (September 22, 2010)
• CBO Analysis: Clean Energy for Less (September 21, 2009)
• CIBO's rehashed and discredited analysis of toxic emission standards (December 20, 2011)
• Can't get “NERA’” to the truth: industry's disingenuous attack on EPA's ozone analysis (August 16, 2011)
• Cement industry's junk economic analysis of EPA toxic emission standards (September 20, 2011)
• Climate Legislation: Is 20 the new 17? (December 14, 2009)
• Climate change endangering public health; new interactive site gives state by state data (August 4, 2011)
• Comprehensive Climate and Energy Legislation: More Jobs, Not Less (April 23, 2010)
• Congressional Research Service: CIBO boiler study used flawed economics (February 16, 2011)
• Contrary to the Heritage Foundation’s “New” Analysis, Climate Legislation Will Not Devastate Farmers or Small Businesses (July 22, 2009)
• Don't read the headlines, read the story: Climate legislation is more than affordable (October 15, 2009)
• EIA Study Confirms Climate Protection is More Than Affordable (August 5, 2009)
• EIA analysis of the American Power Act: modest household costs and dramatic reduction in oil imports (July 16, 2010)
• EPA Analysis: Jobs and Household Incomes Increase Under Climate Policy (April 22, 2009)
• EPA sets the record straight! The Clean Air Act is a net gain to the economy, the environment, and public health (February 11, 2011)
• EPA study confirms comprehensive climate and energy legislation is affordable, equitable, and effective (June 15, 2010)
• Eight Questions to Ask About CRA’s May 2009 Economic Analysis of the Waxman-Markey Cap and Trade Program (July 16, 2009)
• Gains from Clean Air Act: Bull Market Without the Bust (March 1, 2011)
• Government vastly underestimates potential health and environment damages from climate change (July 25, 2011)
• Industry Reports Attacking Clean Air Rules Earn Poor Grades from Professors (October 28, 2010)
• Interstate Differences in Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Much Less Than Meets the Eye (June 18, 2009)
• Keystone XL pipeline: Good for Big Oil, bad for the economy (February 1, 2012)
• MIT study: income growth far exceeds household investment costs under climate legislation, and the poor come out ahead (June 7, 2010)
• Making it real: new study shows exactly where EPA regulations create jobs (December 8, 2011)
• Manufacturing and Allied Products Institute (MAPI): Junk analysis against protective ozone standards (September 21, 2010)
• More good news for climate protection: Study finds benefits swamp the costs (September 11, 2009)
• Multiple studies find comprehensive climate and energy legislation equitable, affordable, and good for the economy (June 16, 2010)
• NAM/ACCF: Distorting their own distorted analysis of climate legislation (September 10, 2009)
• NERA's flawed critique of EPA's analysis of the Clean Air Act (July 5, 2011)
• New study predicts increased employment, energy security, and household energy savings from the American Power Act (May 20, 2010)
• New study sponsored by the Institute for Energy Research (IER): more junk analysis from the well-heeled oil industry (June 30, 2010)
• Newt's Voodoo Economics (March 14, 2009)
• Obstructionists once again attack EPA, using the same fearmongering jobs argument (April 19, 2011)
• Pay Now or Pay Later I: report finds all states lose from inaction on climate change (April 27, 2011)
• Pay Now or Pay Later II: report finds all states lose from inaction on climate change (May 16, 2011)
• Pay Now or Pay Later III: report finds all states lose from inaction on climate change (August 2, 2011)
• Protecting our jobs and economy of the future: reinstate the moratorium on deepwater drilling (July 2, 2010)
• Protecting the Clean Air Act: Better Health, More Jobs (February 8, 2011)
• Protecting the Clean Air Act: Getting the jobs and investment story right (September 13, 2010)
• Pulp and paper industry's junk economic analysis of EPA toxic emission standards for industrial boilers (September 12, 2011)
• Pulp and paper industry's junk economic analysis of proposed EPA toxic emission standards for industrial boilers (October 1, 2010)
• Representative Upton's anti-regulatory rant: when the evidence isn't there, misrepresent, distort, or ignore it (June 29, 2011)
• Seven Questions to Ask About CRA's April 2009 Cap and Trade Analysis (April 30, 2009)
• Seven Questions to Ask of Any Economic Model of Climate Legislation (April 23, 2009)
• Smog in a fog: President Obama abandons the ozone standard, killing jobs rather than protecting them (September 7, 2011)
• Study finds American Power Act creates jobs while decreasing household energy expenditures (June 15, 2010)
• The "new" ACCF Michigan report: recycling old bunk analysis (July 9, 2010)
• The Heritage Foundation's critique of EPA: What is science? (March 8, 2011)
• The Heritage Foundation's critique of the new Clean Air Act jobs study: wrong again (February 13, 2011)
• The Historical Record of Job Growth and Environmental Protection: A Convenient Truth for Climate Legislation (June 18, 2009)
• The National Review: Your pocket-change or your life (May 6, 2010)
• The coal lobby grabbed my inhaler: another junk industry analysis of EPA regulations (November 12, 2011)
• The high costs of fossil fuel dependency: climate change-related health and economic costs, and a costly dirty energy economy (November 7, 2011)
• The usual hysteria: a gas tax, a gas tax, the sky is going to fall (June 25, 2010)

© Natural Resources Defense Council