skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Kate Poole’s Blog

Californians - Find Out Here Where Your Water Comes From

Kate Poole

Posted January 29, 2013 in Health and the Environment, Living Sustainably, Saving Wildlife and Wild Places

Tags:
, , , , , ,
Share | | |

Where does your water come from?  And why should you care?  After all, the Har-Bowl is nearly upon us, and the Oscars are not far behind.  What information about California water could be more interesting than these compelling February diversions?  Click here and find out; you’ll learn from this new NRDC web page where your water comes from, what issues may be facing your water supply, and whether your water agency is planning thoughtfully for the future. 

Knowing where your water comes from matters because we all want to ensure that clean and safe water flows from our tap when we turn it on.  The source of that tapwater determines, in large part, how safe and secure your supply is, now and in the future.  In most regions of California, we have hit hard and fast limits on the amount of water that we can reliably draw from our traditional water sources, including most of the state’s rivers, the Colorado River, and many groundwater basins.  There are alternatives to these traditional sources that can provide the State with a stable and sufficient water supply for a growing population and economy.  But tapping into these alternative water supplies -- such as recycled water, more efficient water use, stormwater capture and reuse, and better groundwater management -- requires planning.  Is your water agency looking ahead and investing in these 21st century solutions? 

Here’s an interesting map illustrating, in broad strokes, that much of the state currently relies on sources of imported water, taken from a report released earlier this month by California’s Legislative Analyst. 

 California map of imported water.PNGMany of these sources of imported water face serious and growing risks that make it likely that they will yield less water in the future.  For example, one of the state's most important water supplies and a major source of imported water for southern California is the San Francisco Bay Delta.  But the risk of earthquakes, ecosystem collapse, climate change and other challenges all threaten the Bay-Delta as a reliable source for future water supplies.  As the Governor explained in his State of the State address last week:  “Central to the life of our state is water and one sixth of that water flows through the San Joaquin Delta.  Silicon Valley, the Livermore Valley, farmers on the East side of the San Joaquin Valley between Fresno and Kern County and farmers on the West side between Tracy and Los Banos, urban Southern California and Northern Contra Costa, all are critically dependent on the Delta for Water. If because of an earthquake, a hundred year storm or sea level rise, the Delta fails, the disaster would be comparable to Hurricane Katrina or Superstorm Sandy: losses of at least $100 billion and 40,000 jobs.”

There are effective, affordable solutions to the threats to the Bay-Delta highlighted by the Governor, as well as other risks facing California’s water supplies, but policymakers need to hear from you to find the path to the best solution.  The more informed Californians are about water issues, the more they will support thoughtful solutions.  That’s why NRDC developed this new tool. So find out where your water supply comes from, and tell Governor Brown and others to invest in the solutions that strengthen our water supply and preserve California’s salmon fishery, and the health of our rivers and streams for decades to come. 

Share | | |

Comments

MikeJan 30 2013 01:29 PM

The "effective, affordable solutions" to the Delta that the author refers to is a recycling of ideas that have been studied for years. Along with other groups who have been critical of the current proposal from BDCP that includes an improved conveyance with two tunnels through the Delta, a portion of the new solutions features a single tunnel with a capacity of only 3,000 cfs. The Bay Delta Conservation Plan studied this proposal a year ago and the results of that study can be found here- http://su.pr/1L2lpr

No one disagrees that something needs to be done to improve a water infrastructure that was built when the population of our state was millions less. But the 3,000 cfs tunnel would not provide sufficient water to meet both urban and agricultural needs south of the Delta. Adopting this smaller proposal would either leave millions of acres of productive farmland without a reliable water supply, or it would require continued reliance on moving water through the Delta. Continuing the status quo is not a solution because it doesn't help fish and it doesn't deliver enough water - the two reasons why a BDCP project is even considered in the first place.

Other elements of the "solutions" offered by the author include development of regional supplies, decreased reliance on the Delta, conservation efforts and more. BDCP does not prohibit these efforts from being undertaken. In fact, others have advocated these measures for years.

Mike Wade
California Farm Water Coalition

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Kate Poole’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In