<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Keren Murphy's Blog: Curbing Pollution</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/kmurphy/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/kmurphy/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:switchboard.nrdc.org,2009:/blogs/kmurphy//207</id>
   <updated>2009-10-25T19:36:25Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Enterprise 1.52</generator>

<entry>
   <title>A Fresh Look at Clean Water Act Enforcement</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/kmurphy/instead_of_my_normal_morning.html" />
   <id>tag:switchboard.nrdc.org,2009:/blogs/kmurphy//207.4415</id>
   
   <published>2009-10-15T22:41:22Z</published>
   <updated>2009-10-25T19:36:25Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Instead of my normal morning bike commute, this morning I made the cold rain-filled walk to the Rayburn House Office Building for an early hearing.&nbsp;&nbsp; The House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee held a hearing called "The Clean Water Act after...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Keren Murphy</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Curbing Pollution" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Health and the Environment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="1994" label="CAFO" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="747" label="cleanwateract" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="2057" label="factoryfarms" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="4267" label="groundwater" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="12" label="pollution" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="1523" label="runoff" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6" label="water" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5049" label="waterprogram" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/kmurphy/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Instead of my normal morning bike commute, this morning I made the cold rain-filled walk to the Rayburn House Office Building for an early hearing.&nbsp;&nbsp; The House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee held a hearing called "The Clean Water Act after 37 years: Recommitting to the Protection of the Nation's Waters." &nbsp;You can watch a video of the hearing <a href="http://transportation.edgeboss.net/wmedia/transportation/20091015fc.wvx"><em>here</em></a><em>.</em>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This oversight hearing explored whether the states and&nbsp;EPA have effectively used the enforcement tools at their disposal in responding to violations of the Clean Water Act.&nbsp;</p>
<p>I went to the hearing expecting to hear the normal political hoopla.&nbsp; What I didn't expect was Judy Treml's testimony. &nbsp;She said that every member of her family, including her infant daughter, became seriously ill from exposure to contaminated water.&nbsp; You see the Treml family lives across the street from a large scale animal feeding operation that, according to&nbsp;&nbsp;Mrs. Treml, spread 80,000 gallons of liquid manure across its fields in winter.</p>
<p>In her written testimony, Mrs Treml described how melting snow caused the manure to run off the field the field and into a neighboring stream:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;My husband, Scott, came home from work and watched the tractor enter the field and begin spreading the liquid waste on the ground. He also watched as the manure ran into the ditch line and down the incline of the field towards School Creek, which runs under our road and through our property.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The way wastes are stored and applied has profound effects on human health and the environment. &nbsp;Releases from storage areas and runoff from manure spread on fields contain a host of nasty contaminants, including parasites and bacteria. &nbsp;This pollution can seep into drinking water and contaminate surface waters. &nbsp;An <a href="http://www.nrdc.org/water/pollution/cesspools/execsum.asp">NRDC report</a> documents the health effects associated with lagoon discharges and spraying fields with too much manure.&nbsp; According to the report, water contaminated by animal manure can contribute to human diseases such as acute gastroenteritis, fever, kidney failure, and even death.</p>
<p>Mrs. Treml talked in detail about her fear for her children.&nbsp; She even brought bottles of water collected from her home to show the House committee, explaining that this is the water that her three children were exposed to.&nbsp;&nbsp; In her written testimony Mrs. Treml described how her youngest daughter, then only a few months old, became ill shortly after they discovered the manure runoff.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>All through that night and Saturday morning, we continued the best we could to push fluids. We could not feed her breast milk as we didn't know whether or not E. coli bacteria passed through breast milk and we pushed as much of the non‐milk formula we could. Every 6 hours our pediatrician called and by 9pm Saturday with no let up in the vomiting or bowel movements, we brought her into the local emergency room, to monitor her hydration. It was there the Emergency Room doctor told me what my daughter's doctor just didn't have the heart to tell me. When I asked the ER doctor, what she thought Samantha's illness was from she stated that in her medical opinion it was her exposure in her Sunday night bath that infected Samantha.&nbsp; I was devastated. I had unwittingly exposed my baby to E. coli contaminated water, because I trusted our safe water sample and I didn't have any knowledge that the manure applied to the land could cross under a road and contaminate our drinking water well.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Unfortunately, due to legal loopholes-such as an EPA regulation adopted late in the Bush administration &mdash; and weak enforcement, factory farms have often escaped needed pollution control. Animal factories are not the only pollution sources that have avoided requirements, a New York Times series called, '<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/18/us/18dairy.html" title="Toxic Waters" target="_blank">Toxic Waters</a>' reports that fewer than three percent of more than 500,000 violations of the Clean Water Act over the past five years by various facilities resulted in fines or other substantial penalties by state officials, and that 40 percent &nbsp;of the country's community water systems violated the Safe Drinking Water Act at least once last year. &nbsp; But just because&nbsp;under-enforcement&nbsp;is common doesn't make it acceptable for an industry as polluting as the industrial livestock sector.</p>
<p>The problems caused by animal factories can be addressed. &nbsp;EPA should adopt clearer, stronger regulations, and enforcement officials need to step up oversight of these operations. That kind of leadership will spur the use of more sustainable livestock production and alternative means of waste disposal. Hopefully today's hearing and Judy Treml's story will help us get there a little quicker.</p>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
<p><em></em></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Déjà Vu: Violating the Migratory Bird Treaty Act</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/kmurphy/after_reading_some_of_the.html" />
   <id>tag:switchboard.nrdc.org,2009:/blogs/kmurphy//207.3922</id>
   
   <published>2009-08-14T20:33:11Z</published>
   <updated>2009-08-24T16:49:19Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[After reading some of the headlines this morning I felt like I had a serious case of d&eacute;j&agrave; vu.&nbsp; All the major news outlets were reporting Exxon Mobil pleads guilty to violating the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.&nbsp; Approximately 85 birds,...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Keren Murphy</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Curbing Pollution" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Moving Beyond Oil" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Saving Wildlife and Wild Places" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="145" label="exxonmobil" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="7271" label="MBTA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="3758" label="migratorybirds" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="1965" label="naturalgas" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="198" label="tarsands" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/kmurphy/">
      <![CDATA[<p>After reading some of the headlines this morning I felt like I had a serious case of d&eacute;j&agrave; vu.&nbsp; All the major news outlets were reporting Exxon Mobil pleads guilty to violating the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Approximately 85 birds, including waterfowl, hawks and owls, died after landing in oily wastewater ponds and natural gas well reserve pits at a number of Exxon's natural gas operations in Wyoming, Kansas, Oklahoma, Colorado and Texas. &nbsp;(Oh and did I mention Exxon Mobil was voted <a href="http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2009/0824/energy-oil-exxonmobil-green-company-of-year.html">"The Green Company of the Year</a>" by Forbes magazine last week?)</p>
<p>According to the <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_13052849">Denver Post</a>,</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The company agreed to pay fines and community-service payments totaling $600,000 and will implement an environmental-compliance plan over the next three years aimed at preventing bird deaths on the company's facilities in the affected states.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But wait, didn't I just read about this happening somewhere else? &nbsp;</p>
<p>Oh yes, yes you did.</p>
<p>In February, Syncrude was charged under provincial environmental law and under the federal migratory bird law for the death of over <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/sclefkowitz/no_ducking_charges_for_deaths.html">500 ducks in Canada</a>. &nbsp;</p>
<p>Like I said d&eacute;j&agrave; vu.</p>
<p>According to the <a href="http://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/contaminants/contaminants1c.html">US Fish and Wildlife Service</a>, bird deaths can be prevented by scrubbing the water of contaminants before discharge, placing netting or plastic "bird balls" over the water to prevent contact, using closed systems, or cannon fire to deter birds from the area.&nbsp;&nbsp; They even mention that the fail-safe way to keep birds from landing in oil slicked ponds is to remove the pits or keep oil from entering them in the first place.</p>
<p>If you'd like to read more about how fuel development affects migratory birds read our&nbsp;<em><a href="http://www.nrdc.org/wildlife/borealbirds.asp">Danger in the Nursery</a></em> report that we put out with <a href="http://www.borealbirds.org/" title="bsi" target="_blank">Boreal Songbird Initiative</a> and <a href="http://www.pembina.org/" title="pembina" target="_blank">Pembina Institute</a>.&nbsp; The report projects that we could lose 6 million to as many as 166 million birds over the coming decades due to tar sands development.</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>River Revitalization with Street Project</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/kmurphy/river_revitalization_with_stre.html" />
   <id>tag:switchboard.nrdc.org,2009:/blogs/kmurphy//207.3775</id>
   
   <published>2009-07-23T22:17:51Z</published>
   <updated>2009-08-02T18:59:17Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[The neighborhood I call home is only a few short blocks from the Anacostia River---a river plagued by pollution from stormwater and sewage overflow. &nbsp;&nbsp;You see, every time it rains metals, bacteria, sediments, and nutrients deposited on highways are discharged...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Keren Murphy</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Curbing Pollution" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="5209" label="anacostiariver" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="2123" label="DC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6235" label="greenstreets" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6996" label="lowimpactdevelopment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="431" label="sewage" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="235" label="stormwater" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/kmurphy/">
      <![CDATA[<p>The neighborhood I call home is only a few short blocks from the Anacostia River---a river plagued by pollution from stormwater and sewage overflow. &nbsp;&nbsp;You see, every time it rains metals, bacteria, sediments, and nutrients deposited on highways are discharged into the river.&nbsp; These pollutants come from vehicle exhaust, vehicle fluids and parts, road wear, use of fertilizer and deicing agents, waste spills, and wildlife.&nbsp;</p>
<p>This isn't a problem unique to Washington, DC.&nbsp; Nationwide, over 28,000 waterways currently don't meet EPA criteria (they are "impaired") for pollutants contained in highway runoff, including 9,000 waterways impaired for mercury and 6,000 each for sediment and nutrients.&nbsp; The problem being that when many highways were built, designers and regulators were not fully aware of the detrimental impact highways have on water quality.&nbsp;</p>
<p>One community upstream from The District has decided to take matters into their own hands.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/22/AR2009072203470.html?hpid=artslot">The Washington Post</a> reported today about the Town of Edmonton's plan to install 'green streets.'&nbsp;&nbsp; Starting this summer local workers are going to be replacing the towns traditional impervious streets with porous brick, rain gardens, bike paths, and a drought-resistant tree canopy all of which will absorb stormwater and residue.</p>
<p>The article also cites the job created through this project:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;Edmonston's "green" street will be its biggest public works project, employing about 40 workers from the town and neighboring communities. The project qualified for $1.3 million in federal stimulus money.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The goal of this project is decreased water pollution from stormwater runoff, less flooding, job creation, and a more natural-looking, aesthetically pleasing town center.</p>
<p>You can read how other communities are using green infrastructure to revitalize their neighborhood, create jobs, and revive their local waterway on NRDC's <a href="http://www.nrdc.org/water/pollution/lid/lidinx.asp">water program page</a>.</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

