skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Keystone XL Pipeline
Clean Energy Successes
Defending the Clean Air Act

Kim Knowlton’s Blog

Depend on Women to Keep the Momentum Rolling on Global Warming

Kim Knowlton

Posted December 17, 2009 in Environmental Justice, Health and the Environment, Moving Beyond Oil, Solving Global Warming

Tags:
, , , , , , , ,
Share | | |

As world leaders continue to arrive in Copenhagen for the final days of critical climate negotiations, the stakes for all of us couldn’t be higher. Women have been engaged throughout the negotiations—from high-level office holders to grassroots leaders who claim their place on the world stage by speaking out for their vulnerable constituencies.

For years women have organized behind the scenes to prepare for the 15th United Nations Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP-15), and official sessions today focus on “Climate and Gender,” with side events also scheduled to highlight “Women as Agents of Change.”

Earlier in the week—at a “Women’s Leadership on Climate Justice” program moderated by former Irish President Mary Robinson and keynoted by Canadian Inuit organizer Shelia Watt-Cloutier—activists described how women have intimate knowledge of the human cost of global warming. Women and their children, members of impoverished populations living in challenged environments, are most at risk. They are critically aware of the need to enact lasting change to protect themselves and the communities they care for from the climate crisis.

Most of us imagine global warming as polar bears stranded on melting ice floes, threatened low-lying coasts, and disappearing tropical forests. While these are environmental effects of deep concern, the story of global warming is a human health story—and that gets less attention.

Earlier this year, I wrote a commentary for this site on how international physicians’ organizations joined together to sound the alarm about global warming as "the biggest global health threat of the 21st century." Science—including data from the U.S. Global Change Research Program, sponsored by both Democratic and Republican administrations over the last 20 years—has shown that global warming is unequivocal and directly affects human health, both internationally and right here at home.

Worsening heat waves; declining air quality; increasing levels of allergens; changing patterns of mosquito, tick, and flea-borne disease; degradation of food and water supplies; catastrophic weather events, flooding, waterborne disease outbreaks; and large numbers of displaced persons are just some of the health challenges that are already occurring worldwide and likely to worsen within our lifetimes. A 2009 Oxfam International study found that by 2015, the number of people affected by climate-related disasters could climb 54 percent to 375 million people each year, threatening to overwhelm humanitarian relief capacity.

The World Health Organization estimates that currently more than 150,000 people perish each year from the effects of a changing climate. Children are vulnerable because they are more susceptible to excessive heat, air pollution, infectious disease, and they depend on others for care, mobility, and shelter in emergencies. Women land squarely in the most-vulnerable category because they comprise an estimated 70 percent of those living below the poverty line globally. Women are also the caregivers for kids, the elderly and the sick, thus bearing the heaviest burdens in times of emergencies, even at our own peril. Yet up to this point, women have often been left out of conversations about climate solutions.

To prepare for Copenhagen and working on the ground at the conference, the Women’s Environment and Development Organization (WEDO) has operated as part of an alliance of 13 UN and 25 civil society organizations—the Global Gender and Climate Alliance. Their efforts will ensure that gender-specific language remains in documents negotiated in Copenhagen. That work is essential so that signatories commit themselves to protecting women’s rights and to including women in strategies and negotiations going forward.

Women officials are well represented COP-15: Danish Environmental Minister Connie Hedegaard presided over the talks until she passed that role to Denmark’s prime minister (observers say in order to “ramp up” the urgency of the final high-level meetings); U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton arrives in Copenhagen today; House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, along with the presidents of Finland and the Philippines, is scheduled to attend an event highlighting women’s leadership; and EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson has appeared frequently in the media as a spokeswoman—as she did before leaving for Copenhagen when, announcing a finding that greenhouse gases endanger human health and public welfare, she opened the door to sweeping new domestic regulations of many industries. (Aiding in the effort toward a cleaner U.S. future, Senator Barbara Boxer [D-CA] has joined with Senator John Kerry [D-MA] to cosponsor the Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act.)

Women, who know how their villages work and how to make sustainable, long-term local change happen, can drive meaningful progress from the bottom up. Among those joining Watt-Cloutier at the women’s leadership panel earlier this week to speak out on women’s needs were Constance Okollet, an organizer and farmer in eastern Uganda; Ulamila Kurai Wragg, a journalist who reports on the impact of climate change in the Cook Islands and Fiji; and Rehana Bibi Khilji, founder of a human rights group in rural Pakistan. These activist leaders have their counterparts in the United States, such as Majora Carter, who founded Sustainable South Bronx; Peggy M. Shepard, of West Harlem Environmental Action (WEACT); and Sharon Hanshaw, who works to rebuild her community in post-Katrina Biloxi, Mississippi, through Coastal Women for Change.

According to Frances Beinecke, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council, a strong financial commitment by the United States to help developing nations adapt to the effects of global warming is key to holding together the current negotiations. “Our financing pledge could be the game-changer in the most important—and dangerously fragile—negotiations of our generation,” she wrote from Copenhagen.

Leadership from the top is essential, but there are also thousands of local opportunities to take swift action, so that we can thrive and remain secure in a globally warming future. So let’s move together. Our lives really do depend on united action.

This post originally appeared at the Women's Media Center website.

Share | | |

Comments

Sarah JohnsonDec 17 2009 10:06 PM

1: Ice has always melted near the poles every spring, and polar bears swim all the time. Their population has also increased since the aleged warming began.

2:The Midieval Warm Period (wich was much warmer than today) is associated with great wealth and prosparity. This was when vineards grew in england and the great cathedrals were constructed. (polar bears also lived during this time).

3: Suggesting that people die directly from global warming is absurd. no offence :)

4:Hacked e-mails from the University of East Anglia reveal that climate data has been altered, and descenting opinions have been excluded from the "official" science. Is this the sort of science on which we should base legislation that will lower everyone's standard of living and have dramatic economic effects?

5:Why aren't we focusing on real environmental concerns like water polution and deforestation?

6:Global problems like global warming, require global solutions, like global government. Maybe this is why we are told to believe that global warming is the most important environmental issue.

7:The U.S. has no money. We can't pay off our debt as it is, how can we make a "strong financial commitment" to help developing nations reduce CO2 emmissions?

8:If men and women are equals why do you feel the need to set women apart and accentuate their accomplishments over those of men?

9:We should develope alternative energies, not because of global warming but because we will eventually run out of fossil fuels.

John LiffeeDec 18 2009 04:16 PM

Sarah, please go back and place your head back in the sand with the rest of your teabagger/birther friends. Your assertions are just ... wrong.

sarah johnsonDec 18 2009 04:33 PM

Thats funny i got all my info from actual scientists. Where do you get yours?

jack thimmeschDec 18 2009 11:25 PM

HAHAHA I disagree with Sarah on one point. Global warming does kill people. Actually, forcing developing nations to us less energy kills people. Developing nations simply can't afford to grow this way. The global warming scam means no developement for Africa, lower standards of living, oh and LOTS OF MONEY for people like AL GORE. Wats his carbon footprint? wat a joke... people are blind

jack ThimmeschDec 18 2009 11:50 PM

People like John are the reason the whole world falls for such lies. It has become like herecy to voice opinions about global warming that dissagree with the brainwashed masses. There are many scientists who completely object to the theory of man made global warming. The research of these scientists was either radically altered or completely ignored by the IPCC. Is this the way science is supposed to work??? NO! the data presented by the IPCC wouldn't be accepteble on a 9th grade science project. How can we make such radical decisions on unsound science. Ice core records show that CO2 has never driven climate but rather followes by as much as 800 years. In other words, warming causes and increase in CO2. CO2 is however a greenhouse gas; the effects it has on climate are just completely imeasurable.

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Kim Knowlton’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In