skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Jacob Scherr’s Blog

Cities around the World sharing Climate Solutions via C40

Jacob Scherr

Posted March 14, 2014 in Solving Global Warming

Tags:
, , , ,
Share | | |

On January 31st, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon named former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg as a Special Envoy for Cities and Climate Change.  This appointment reflects the growing recognition of the global impact of cities which, according to Bloomberg,  account for  "more than 70 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions and two-thirds of the world's energy use today."  Sarah Glazer reports here on the current efforts by C40 - a network of major cities - to work together to take local actions to address climate change.  The UN hopes that Bloomberg, also chair of C40's Board, will in his new role stimulate even more commitments by municipalities to reduce emissions and increase their capacity to adapt to a changing climate.  UN Photo/Eskinder Debebe

Last May, New York City packed 100 geeks into a room for 14 hours on a Saturday, fueled them with coke and pizza, and offered them cash prizes for new apps that could improve the city’s environment.  By the end of day 16 projects emerged, from crossword-style games that teach energy literacy to a Google street view to visualize future flood levels. First prize for the best energy, environment and resilience app went to a solar evaluation calculated on a smartphone to figure out a homeowner’s costs for going solar.

This type of hackathon is just one of the many ideas that cities are sharing with one another through C40, a global network of 66 mega-cities from Beijing to New York that have made a commitment to do something about climate change.

Hackathons like New York’s are catching on in cities around the world, James Alexander, C40’s finance and economic development initiative director, told me in a conversation near his London office. Rio de Janeiro, he told me, has run hackathons to solve big city problems like complaints about broken street lights and tree pruning.

Although C40’s member cities are spread across Europe, Asia, Africa, and North and South America, the network makes extensive use of video-conferencing and webinars to share ideas, says Alexander. “Using these platforms, major global cities have the freedom to say, ‘You know guys, this didn’t work and we could have saved ourselves three months of running around if we’d just known this… so don’t go down that alleyway.’”

The learning among cities is a two-way street. A key part of C40’s philosophy is “If one city is trying to do something, either another city has already done it and can share their successes and battle scars, or someone else probably wants to do it,” Alexander says.  “So why not all learn together how to do it rather than each individually inventing the wheel?”

While the hackathon may sound like a big party, it’s actually part of a serious effort by cities to take advantage of the green economy—saving the city money, improving urban life and creating new jobs.

The winner of New York’s CleanWeb hackathon last May, SolarList, trains students and young entrepreneurs to educate homeowners about their solar options with its phone-based free home assessment, then refers homeowners to its preferred list of installers. Along the way, homeowners pay less, installers sell more solar and young entrepreneurs get paid.

 It’s estimated that New York City could install enough rooftop solar to supply 40 percent of the city’s electricity during peak demand, but so far the city has tapped less than 1 percent of that potential.

 A recent survey found that over the last two years C40 cities have nearly doubled the number of actions they have taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to improve urban resilience to climate change. Ideas are flowing not just from rich to poor countries, but from cities in developing countries to mayors in wealthier cities.

 For example, a 2011 survey showed that every C40 city in South America already had or was planning a Bus Rapid Transit system—which usually provides dedicated lanes to protect buses from traffic congestion-- providing efficient bus service at low cost to large numbers of passengers. Following the lead of cities like Curitiba, Brazil, which pioneered the idea, and Bogota, Colombia, which greatly expanded it, 35 cities have started or plan to develop such systems, and more than half are in the more developed northern hemisphere, the survey found.

Even as national and international leaders seem to have trouble reaching climate agreements, mayors realize that if a severe climate crisis hits their city there’s nowhere to hide. As a result many are taking matters into their own hands: 62 percent of the cities have established their own funds to invest in energy efficiency, renewable energy or carbon reduction projects.

But funding projects like new Bus Rapid Transit systems or waste- -to-energy costs money—sometimes a lot of money. “Many of our cities would say the financing barriers are as big if not bigger challenges than technical problems” around building this infrastructure needed to combat climate change, Alexander says.

Remarkably, more than a third of the network’s mega-cities do not even have a credit rating, which means they either cannot borrow money or can’t borrow at affordable rates. That’s particularly true of cities in developing areas of Africa, Latin America and Asia. “We’re helping them find out what they need to do to get credit-rated,” Alexander says, partly by sharing learning on how other cities do it.

 C40 is also looking into what cities need to do to make their projects more attractive to investors. This May, cities from the network will be presenting their proposed projects to investors at a summit in Basel, Switzerland, sponsored by Global Infrastructure Basel, a non-profit foundation with Swiss government backing. The foundation is acting as a matchmaker between investors like pension funds and cities looking to finance sustainable projects.

Cities that have already seen the benefits of such projects hope their case will be convincing to investors and their electorate alike. For example, efforts to make buildings more energy-efficient by installing double-glazed windows and insulation on a wide-scale can create thousands of jobs for installers.

            If you’re the mayor of a big city, Alexander points out, “You start saying, even if we ignore the positive impact of this project on the environment, this would still be worthwhile to do because it would help the economy grow, it would create jobs, it would save on energy bills and give people more money in their pocket to spend in the city.”

Share | | |

Comments

Michael BerndtsonMar 16 2014 10:48 AM

Very interesting stuff. I needed an article like this after reading an article on Wyoming cutting climate science from its education curriculum.

http://trib.com/news/local/education/wyoming-first-state-to-block-new-science-standards/article_5d0ec624-6b50-5354-b015-ca2f5f7d7efe.html

I realize Wyoming has less people in its entire state than New York has on the island of Manhattan. Actually I'm just guessing this is the case.

A good testing ground on the effectiveness of climate science education and this effort outlined in the post would be Illinois. Not just Chicago, but the entire state. Illinois is urban/exurban/rural. It's economy is diverse. It has all the political problems the country has, and then some.

My thesis question is this. Can efforts like C40 transition from urban to suburban to rural America? Specifically, can ideas like this transfer from little cities where carbon footprints are small - to where the carbon footprints are big, i.e. suburban sprawl, exurbia and rural Walmart-villes.

For example and on the one hand, Rahm Emanuel could push through some super awesome climate hackathon for urban achievers at selected magnet and charter schools, sponsored by the usual families, foundations, NGOs and corporate supporters. Promote it as disruptively game changing via a waiting-for-superman-esque media campaign.

On the other hand, the state of Illinois continues to lay pipe for tar sands diluted bitumen transport, which makes Caterpillar and the operating engineers happy. Manufacture tank cars for Bakken crude and Alberta bitumen rail shipping, which makes financial houses happy. All this while mobilizing for shale gas/liquids production in the southern tip of the State. Petroleum geologically speaking, the hydrocarbon in the New Albany shale is probably going to be in the form of natural gas liquids and light crude for transportation fuel. Instead of natural gas to replace coal for firing electrical power plants - the promoted climate change fighting plan. (I left out industrial agriculture for brevity)

I guess my point really is this. Illinois is not the greenest of states. Outside of Chicago and adjacent suburbs, it's pretty conservative. Not unlike Wyoming when it comes to environmentalism. It would be nice to see how climate education impacts areas outside of Chicago and other cities not highly controlled by a few. This would be the few that make money or made money from production and trading commodities. The stuff that causes climate change and the impending miserableness for most of us.

JCMar 16 2014 05:22 PM

The best chance to mitigate climate change is to severely reduce consumption of animal foods. About 1/2 of human induced warming is attributable to animal agriculture. Methane is 24 times more potent than CO2 but takes only 7 years to cycle out of the atmosphere. CO2 takes around 100 years to come out. Human pursuit of animal protein is the leading cause of methane release and a primary cause of CO2 concentrating in the atmosphere. Check the facts and act!

"A 1% reduction in world-wide meat intake has the same benefit as a three trillion-dollar investment in solar energy." ~ Chris Mentzel, CEO of Clean Energy

"As environmental science has advanced, it has become apparent that the human appetite for animal flesh is a driving force behind virtually every major category of environmental damage now threatening the human future: deforestation, erosion, fresh water scarcity, air and water pollution, climate change, biodiversity loss, social injustice, the destabilization of communities, and the spread of disease." Worldwatch Institute, "Is Meat Sustainable?"

“If every American skipped one meal of chicken per week and substituted vegetables and grains... the carbon dioxide savings would be the same as taking more than half a million cars off of U.S. roads.” Environmental Defense Fund

Join the revolution with a 21-Day Vegan Kickstart
http://www.pcrm.org/health/diets/kickstart/kickstart-programs

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Jacob Scherr’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In