skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Jennifer Sass’s Blog

Another toxic pesticide bought the farm - Aldicarb

Jennifer Sass

Posted August 17, 2010 in Health and the Environment

Tags:
, , , , , , , ,
Share | | |

Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a deal with Bayer CropScience to end the use of a highly toxic pesticide, Aldicarb. This is good news for health and environmental protection. Aldicarb is part of the N-methyl carbamate family of pesticides, and EPA has taken action over the last year to eliminate two other carbamate pesticides: carbofuran (all food uses were cancelled), and carbaryl (uses in flea and tick collars for pets was cancelled) - both after significant pressure, including legal petitions, from NRDC.

That's all good news, since the carbamates are old war-era chemicals that over-stimulate nervous system function, causing nausea, dizziness, confusion, and can lead to paralysis or death in extreme cases. Exposures during early life stages of development can interfere with normal brain and nervous system structure, causing permanent alterations and potentially long-term developmental damage.

What's the not so good news? Well, although EPA determined that these pesticides no longer met the safety standard required to be registered ('reasonable certainty of no harm'), EPA negotiated in all cases with the registrants, and only the registrants. No public health or environmental groups were consulted or involved. Maybe that's why all the pesticides were granted phase-outs of several years or longer. That means that even though EPA decided that Aldicarb is unsafe today, it will continue to be manufactured until 2014, and sold until 2018. That's a lot of years of unsafe continued use of a hazardous pesticide!

The Pesticide Office always does its business this way. For example, last month EPA negotiated a phase-out of endosulfan over 2 to 4 years (depending on the use). It is a hazardous, persistent pesticide that lasts for years in the environment and is found in breast milk and the body tissues of mammals even in regions where it is not used. It is already banned in over 60 countries, including the European Union. NRDC also fought to eliminate this nasty chemical - but it will be used another 2 to 4 years in this country. Why? Maybe because EPA negotiated only with the registrant instead of using a more public open process.

Kudos to EPA for taking the science seriously and forcing the removal of hazardous pesticides from the market when they cannot meet the safety standard. But, slap-slap for the closed-door negotiations that lead to years-long phase-outs while people and wildlife continue to get poisoned.

Hey, Pesticide Office, call me into the room next time you enter negotiations - i'll get your back!

Share | | |

Comments

James TerBushAug 17 2010 06:35 PM

The EPA says that it is committed to transparency, but the continued use of closed-door meetings with pesticide registrants concerning pesticide safety says otherwise. What's worse, the EPA says that transcripts of these meetings are not available to the public, and requests for information under the Freedom of Information Act requests are often denied.

Jen SassAug 18 2010 07:04 AM

Yes, James you are correct - no public records of these negotiations are available.

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Jennifer Sass’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In