Food Guru and Global Warming: Meat and Mark Bittman on NPR
- Josh Mogerman
- Senior Media Associate, Chicago
- Blog | About
- Posted January 22, 2009 in Living Sustainably , Solving Global Warming
I do a lot of the cooking in my house and Mark Bittman's book, How to Cook Everything, has become my kitchen bible. Bittman is not a chef. He's a journalist whose thoughtful stories have led him down a path to a small but growing food media empire.
His blog is great (thoughtful and cool recipes). His PBS shows are fun and educational (not typical cooking fare). And he continues to write.
Which brings me to this morning, when I was surprised to hear his voice over the NPR airwaves pimping a new book on "conscious eating." He describes the book as:
Here's the summary: Eat less meat, and fewer animal products in general (I'll get to specifics on page 93). Eat fewer refined carbohydrates, like white bread, cookies, white rice, and pretzels. Eat way less junk food: soda, chips, snack food, candy, and so on. And eat far more vegetables, legumes, fruits, and whole grains-as much as you can.
OK, seems reasonable.
But most of his interview, was focused on the "less meat" part of the equation. While there are quite a few vegetarians at NRDC, I am not one of them. I love meat. Still, Bittman's take is thought-provoking. Instead of the typical 10 meals/week in the American diet centered on meat, why not shift down to eight? When you look at the climate and pollution implications that come from modern factory farming, there are persuasive reasons to make this kind of change.
Still, I was a surprised that some of the stuff Bittman suggested on-air sounded...well...not particularly tasty. Soy sauce on oatmeal is pretty suspect, but that is not the point.
The point is, here's a guy who has devoted much of his life and career to food. In looking closely at his work, he sees a strong and, in his mind, dangerous connection to global warming. And so, he has made changes in his life to address these concerns. And while these are not necessarily huge changes---they certainly affect his world view and livelihood.
Listening to the interview, It turns out that the change has also paid off for him:
After just a few months of the new diet, Bittman says, he noticed improvements to his health: "I lost 35 pounds - which is about 15 percent of my body weight - my cholesterol went down 40 points; my blood sugar went from borderline bad to just fine; [and] my knees, which were starting to give out as a result of running at too high a weight, got better."
All of those things - and, he says, he's shrinking his carbon footprint.
"Feeling like you're changing the world," he says. "That's a nice thing, too."
I have no idea if the changes that Bittman is advocating can have the same impact on the planet as they've had in his personal life. My guess is yes...there are a number of groups out there advocating for much more drastic changes and there is evidence that broad changes in either the American diet and/or large-scale factory farm practices could make a big difference in the fight against climate change.
Let's be clear. I don't plan to become a vegetarian and I am not suggesting those lifestyle changes for anyone else. Your relationship with meat is your own business... (That is a very odd sentence to type, BTW.)
But I do think we are in a new era of personal responsibility and some of what I heard in the interview rings true to me. We are all going to have to do things to avert climate catastrophe. Some will involve vast economy-wide solutions, while others will be small changes and choices made at home.
That's why I had a falafel sandwich for lunch...
Who says change can't be tasty?
(bookmark or email this entry)
Comments are closed for this post.
We close comments on a blog post when it's clear the conversation has moved on -- click on the tags (above) or on our homepage to see if we've got fresh news and views on this post's topic.




Comments
Stephanie E. — Jan 22 2009 06:53 PM
I find it really disappointing to see statements such as this at NRDC: "The point is, here is a guy who has devoted much of his life and career to food. In looking closely at his work, he sees a strong and, in his mind, dangerous connection to global warming." Just "in his mind"? Really? Even the United Nations and Nobel Prize winners are telling the world that nearly one-fifth of greenhouse gases--more than all the transportation of the world combined--comes from animal agriculture and that humans must decrease their consumption of animals and animal products, yet you imply that the connection between humans' diet and global warming is just Bittman's opinion.
Furthermore, even for people who aren't at all concerned with animal rights (as I admit I am), humans' "relationship" with meat is clearly no longer just a person's own private business, not when the environmental implications of our dietary decisions are so great. I was an environmentalist before I was an animal rights advocate, and it bothers me enormously when I see my fellow environmentalists try to ignore inconvenient facts because they don't wish to make real changes in their lives.
For the perspective of someone else who too really, really loves meat still but who has chosen to give it (and most egg and dairy consumption) up for environmental reasons, I strongly recommend this recent (and excellent) article from Audubon's magazine: http://audubonmagazine.org/features0901/viewpoint.html
Josh Mogerman — Jan 22 2009 08:16 PM
Stephanie---
Thanks for the comments.
By no means is this all in Mark Bittman's head! There is no doubt that changes need to be made to our food production system. Factory farms must be better regulated to deal with pollution, climate and ethical issues. That kind of systematic change will give the public room to make their own dietary decisions, just as Mr. Bittman did.