skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Clean Power plan
Safe Chemicals

Frances Beinecke’s Blog

Medical Experts Say Addressing Climate Change Is Good for Our Health

Frances Beinecke

Posted May 6, 2014

, , , , , ,
Share | | |

Click here to take actionThe National Climate Assessment released its latest report today. It outlined the toll extreme weather is taking on our homes, businesses, and communities. But it also focused on a less obvious consequence of climate change: it threatens our health. 

The report found that Americans are already experiencing respiratory illnesses, heart problems, and water-borne diseases as a result of climate change. And those hazards will only increase if we don’t take action now to reduce the carbon pollution that causes climate change.

Health experts are especially concerned about the impacts of rising temperatures. Extreme heat kills more Americans every year than hurricanes, tornadoes, and all other natural disasters combined, and now climate change is putting even more people at risk.  The chances of experiencing an intensely hot summer rose from 1-in-300 (1951 through 1980) to 1-in-10 (1981 through 2010), according to a study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The National Climate Assessment found that St. Louis, Philadelphia, Chicago, Cincinnati, and other cities have seen a dramatic increase in death rates and hospitalizations from heat waves. Hotter weather can trigger migraines, respiratory conditions, and heart and kidney problems.  A study conducted by researchers at Columbia University and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention predicted that heat-related deaths in New York City could rise 20 percent by the 2020s.

Warmer temperatures also contribute to smog in the air, and breathing this pollution can inflame our lungs. Repeated inflammation over time can permanently scar lung tissue, even in low concentrations. The American Thoracic Society—the professional association of lung doctors—said climate change is especially dangerous for children and senior citizens because their lungs are more vulnerable to respiratory diseases caused by smog.

Climate change also increases the risk of floods. Flooding kills nearly 100 Americans every year, and that number is expected to grow as storms become more frequent and intense. Superstorm Sandy alone killed 117 people in the U.S. But the risks don’t end when the storm fades.

 Intense downpours can overwhelm sewage treatment plants, releasing more pathogens into our drinking water.  After Superstorm Sandy, at least 12 New Jersey communities urged residents to boil water before drinking it to prevent the spread of E. coli and similar gastrointestinal diseases. More than 750 cities and towns have older sewer systems that carry sewage and rain water in the same pipes. Heavy rains and flooding from climate change will lead to more incidents of untreated sewage flowing into our waterways.  

It’s time to do more to protect our loved ones from harm.  We can start by helping communities prepare for the health effects of climate change. More early warning systems and better tracking of illnesses, for instance, will allow us become more resilient in the face of extreme weather events.

But we must also address this crisis at its root cause: the pollution that causes climate change.

Power plants are the largest US source of this pollution, yet astonishingly they are free to dump as much carbon into our atmosphere as they want. This June, the Environmental Protection Agency will propose the first-ever national limits on carbon pollution from existing power plants.

According to NRDC’s analysis, the United States can reduce carbon pollution from power plants by 25 percent to 30 percent by 2020 using readily available, cost-effective technology. This would represent a major dent in carbon pollution—equivalent to removing as many as 130 million cars from the road. Click here to tell the EPA you support strong carbon limits to clean up our air and stabilize the climate.

By reducing dangerous carbon pollution now, we can help improve our health today and provide a healthier, more sustainable future for the next generation.

Share | | |


Michael BerndtsonMay 6 2014 10:43 AM

I'd include mental and spiritual health to all of this as well.

It's hard as an individual sometimes to grasp the interconnection between life on earth and climate change acceleration. Plus there's already multiple layers of intercedence rapidly developing including thought leaders, environmental policy wonks, climate change communicators and miscellaneous experts.

My reduction in driving compared to the constant flow of traffic on the Stevenson and Eisenhower Expressways is miniscule. So I got to do something anything. Commenting on blogs or writing a blog post is one way to force thoughts of planet destruction from ruminating endlessly inside my head. Picking up trash along the sidewalk, while on my middle age power walks, is another.

I cut off ignorance as an excuse for increasing environmental degradation at 1980 (or was it 1981?). The year Superfund was enacted into law (CERCLA). Sure there was already Clean Water and Air Acts. And the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) among others. But CERCLA required the current generation to clean up messes made by previous generations. My generation (baby boomer, kind of) and latter ones, cannot use ignorance as an excuse to not do something about environmental protection and remediation, including climate change. Future generations have every right to call out baby boomers as what they are, a bunch of selfish bastards.

Purgatory is another. I'm not much of a spiritualist. I need scary manifestations for my religiosity.

So when I'm sitting in purgatory, waiting for an interview for either going to heaven or hell, I assume the first question would be, "what did you do about man made climate change acceleration?" [ I assume purgatory is a huge doctors waiting room with really uncomfortable chairs and horrible reading material. Kind of like in the movie Beetlejuice.]

I really can't use ignorance or doubt as an excuse. Especially since I spent the past 25 to 30 years working in the environmental business. This also applies to all my associates working in environmental consulting - and keeping mum about climate change - as to not upset the client. That client usually is an oil and gas company, among others, contributed more than their fair share of carbon dioxide emissions.

James Singmaster, III, Ph.D.May 8 2014 03:28 PM

Only one action is viable and attainable for human survival on Earth--WE HAVE TO MAKE THE SUN OUR SOLE ENERGY-POWER SOURCE!!!!!! Thomas Edison in 1931 stated "I would bet all my money on the sun and solar energy. What an incredible and never-ending source of power. I hope that we don't have to wait until all the coal and oil run out before we can tackle that fine idea"
I would add before we waste the future trying to get
N-power that still releases trapped energy to worsen CC/GW!!! J.A Singmaster, Ph.D. Environmental Chemist, Ret. Davis, CA

Comments are closed for this post.


Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit

Feeds: Frances Beinecke’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In