skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Clean Power plan
Safe Chemicals

Frances Beinecke’s Blog

Latest Shell Debacle in Alaska Part of a Larger Pattern of Risk and Failure

Frances Beinecke

Posted January 3, 2013

, , , , , , , , , , ,
Share | | |

Shell Oil’s string of failures in its Arctic Ocean drilling attempts continued into the New Year. One of the company's drill rigs ran aground near Alaska’s Kodiak Island with 150,000 gallons of diesel fuel and other petroleum products onboard.  In the face of a winter storm, all four of its tow vessel’s engines failed.  Then the tow line failed, and repeated efforts to re-attach lines and tow the rig clear of danger failed as well.

One storm thwarted Shell’s plans to haul its rig to Seattle for maintenance. Yet the North is a region of storms. It is home to churning seas, punishing winds, frigid temperatures, and months of prolonged darkness. The oil giant’s failure to prepare for and cope with plausible weather conditions and the resulting threats to human life and the environment make it vividly clear: Shell has no business trying to drill in the Arctic Ocean.


Shell's drill rig, the Kulluk, ran aground New Year's Eve. Photo credit: U.S. Coast Guard Petty Officer 3rd Class Jonathan Klingenberg.

The dangers don’t end in the Arctic. This drill rig debacle occurred 1,000 miles from Shell’s drill site. The challenges and risks of Arctic drilling extend through the entire 2,000-mile delivery route to Seattle shipyards. And they leave countless coastal communities and marine ecosystems vulnerable to accidents like this one in Kodiak.

Shell has poured billions of dollars into offshore Arctic drilling, but no matter how much it spends, it cannot make the effort anything but a terrifying gamble. And if Shell, the most profitable company on Earth, can’t buy its way to safety in Alaska, nobody can.

The grounding of Shell’s drilling rig is not an isolated incident. It is part of a larger pattern in which Shell has proven no match for the elements. NRDC and our partners are calling for an immediate suspension to drilling activities in the Arctic Ocean based on this record of failure.

In July, one of Shell’s drill ships slipped anchor and nearly ran aground in the Aleutian Islands on its way to a drill site in the Chukchi Sea. That same month, Shell conceded that it would not, as the government understood, collect 90 percent of any oil spill, but only “encounter” that much of it.

Through August, Shell had to keep its spill response barge the Arctic Challenger in Bellingham, Washington because it was plagued with so many problems. The barge is a linchpin in Shell’s emergency plan, designed to be stationed between Shell’s two drilling sites always at the ready. Yet the Coast Guard wouldn’t certify it as seaworthy until the company dealt with 400 issues, including wiring and other safety shortcomings.

Then, when Shell started preliminary drilling without the spill response barge, within 24 hours its rig the Noble Discoverer had to flee from a 30-mile long iceberg that bore down on the drill site.

In September, Shell’s containment dome—used to capture oil in the event of spill—was “crushed like a beer can” during pre-deployment testing. If this critical piece of spill response equipment couldn’t function in the mild environs of the Bellingham harbor, imagine what could happen in the rough seas of the Arctic.

Shell’s subsequent retreat from the Arctic was marred by punishing weather and problems evacuating drilling crews, disconnecting cables to the seabed, and refueling.  Then the Coast Guard detained the Noble Discoverer for safety and pollution violations, after it limped into harbor with propulsion difficulties on its way south.

These are just some of the failures Shell has created as it tries to open our Arctic Ocean to oil development. The region can’t afford any more of these kinds of mishaps. It’s time to stop endangering the world’s last wild ocean—and all the communities and marine life it supports. This video, narrated by Robert Redford, reveals some of the other wonders put at risk by Shell’s Arctic drilling plans:


We must not sacrifice one of our remaining untamed places in reckless pursuit of oil. We know we have to leave oil in the ground or destructive climate change will become unstoppable. If not in the pristine and vulnerable Arctic Ocean, then where?

We don’t need to endanger this wild region when we have better options. The new clean car standards issued in 2012 alone will double the fuel efficiency of America’s car fleet and cut our need to import oil by one-third. We can power our economy without despoiling our wild places. Click here to tell the Obama Administration to stop Shell’s reckless Arctic offshore scheme.


Share | | |


GordonChamberlainJan 3 2013 09:13 PM

The campaign has begun to have those committing ecocide face criminal prosecution under the mandate of the 112 signatories of the International Criminal Court.has begun. (Note web site is down since Jan 02 2012 ? )
Please stop making billions of dollars destroying our planet will not work.
The destabilisation of our planets climate is ecocide, as was the plundering of the cod, now the blue fin tuna, sharks and fish, forest, mineral, and water resources. The same species that profited from the atrocities of slavery, colonialism, the Holocaust, numerous genocides is now profiting from ecocide., the large scale long term damage or destruction of our environment, the web of life our life support systems. Where we draw the line on politicians and the corporations they are colluding with that are profiting from global human, ecological, and economic accounting fraud that is endangering the web of life and destabilize our planets climate with the associated sea level rise and ocean acidification will determine how many fellow citizens will perish along with the web of life.
This is fraud, criminal negligence on a global scale. The CEOs of the petroleum corporations must face criminal prosecution for misleading politicians that we need more carbon based fuels. They are lying to investors about the risk associated with global climate destabilization. The CEOs of Corporate tobacco got away with lying to citizens and profited from manufacturing epidemics of illness, cancer, anguish, pain suffering financial ruin and death. The values they are using are evident in that they have no intention of dismantling their toxic agenda. What would evil look like. The do not look like the fictitious characters Hollywood feeds to ill informed citizens they sit in corner offices and wears suits. Their actions demonstrate that they intend to profit from ecocide the large scale long term damage or destruction of the web of life?

Justin Chernalis Jan 5 2013 09:25 PM

Do not let them drill!!!

Kay MinklerJan 6 2013 11:13 PM

No Drilling.

Katharyn DaviesJan 9 2013 07:37 AM

You have only to see the devastation caused bt Shell in the once beautiful Niger Delta. Shell has NO interest in that environment, let alone its people, only greed.

Drilling in the Arctic is madness. Allowing Shell to do so is an abomination.

Bodil RibelJan 13 2013 07:49 AM

NO ONE ... not Shell or any other oil company should NOT EVER be allowed to drill in the Arctic or the Antarctic ... the environment and nature is too fragile !!!

Comments are closed for this post.


Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit

Feeds: Frances Beinecke’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In