skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Frances Beinecke’s Blog

Cleaning Up Climate Change Polluting Is Cheaper and Easier than We Thought

Frances Beinecke

Posted March 21, 2014 in Solving Global Warming

Tags:
, , , , , , , ,
Share | | |

This week another group of esteemed scientists said that climate change poses a dire threat to our communities. New evidence also confirmed that one of the best tools for defusing this threat is within reach. On Thursday NRDC released a report showing that the United States can cut more carbon pollution from power plants at less cost than previously thought.

This latest analysis shows that firm limits on power plant emissions can eliminate up to 700 million tons of carbon pollution per year in 2020. That’s equivalent to taking up to 130 million cars off the road. The U.S. can also save up to $60 billion in avoided climate change and medical costs in 2020. Those are major savings, and they can’t come soon enough.

Power plants kick out 40 percent of the carbon pollution in our country. The U.S. limits mercury, arsenic, and soot from power plants. And yet, amazingly, there are no national limits on how much carbon these plants can dump into our atmosphere. That's not right, and we need to fix it.

In June, the Environmental Protection Agency will propose the first-ever carbon limits on power plants. NRDC’s report shows that strong limits can save money, protect health, and stabilize the climate. We owe it to future generations to rein in this dangerous pollution.

NRDC expert on how America can meet carbon pollution standards with clean energy.

How do we do it? NRDC’s analysis shows that deep carbon cuts can be made by expanding energy efficiency, wind power, and pollution control measures. These solutions have been put to work in communities across America. They confirm that many states are already on the path toward meeting the EPA’s forthcoming standards.

 

I recently met with Governor Jerry Brown in California, and he spoke passionately about the state’s enormous success with low-carbon energy. California passed a law to curb carbon pollution eight years ago, and it is now on track to generate 33 percent of its electricity from renewable resources like wind and solar. California’s clean tech companies have attracted $27 billion in venture capital since 2006, and 360,000 Californians have jobs in the clean economy.

Nine Northeastern states, meanwhile, have a joint program to reduce carbon pollution from power plants, and 30 states require that a percentage of electricity come from renewable sources like wind and solar. Cities are also making major progress.

Several weeks ago, I met with mayors of 10 major cities that have made a unified commitment to expand energy efficiency. Former Mayor Michael Bloomberg told us that efficiency measures helped drive down New York City’s climate change pollution by 19 percent and made the air cleaner than it’s been in 50 years. Now NRDC is helping 10 other cities adopt similar measures, and together they could cut the same amount of climate change pollution every year as taking 1.5 million cars off the road. They could also lower energy bills by nearly $1 billion annually.

Fossil fuel companies want us to believe that clean energy solutions are out of reach. The truth is they are right in front of us—bringing jobs, clean air, and economic activity to communities across the country.

Now America can use these solutions to meet the EPA’s carbon limits for power plants.  And according to NRDC’s latest report the benefits will be even greater than expected.

NRDC updated our 2012 blueprint for reducing carbon pollution to reflect the latest trends in the electricity industry, including lower electricity demand and reduce costs for wind turbines and natural gas. We found that for a compliance cost ranging from zero to $15 billion in 2020, the United States could unleash $50 billion to $120 billion in energy efficiency and renewable investments in the next six years. We could also save thousands of lives and prevent 17,000 asthma attacks and other health problems in 2020 alone.

Many states have already started moving toward this cleaner, more sustainable future. Now it’s time for the entire nation to get there. Click here to tell the Obama Administration to set strong limits on carbon pollution from power plants.  

Share | | |

Comments

ilma SixthirtyMar 21 2014 06:30 PM

Firstly, what is 'carbon pollution'? If it's CO2, then that's a very different substance to carbon. The former is a colorless odourless gas, and the latter is a black solid. I presume CO2 is being referred to, but there is no way CO2 can be called 'pollution'. It is the very substance of life. Without it we all die, and there's still no casual evidence that man's CO2 at 3% of the total atmospheric CO2 (so 0.0012% of the atmosphere) has or has had any driving effect on global temperatures or weather events. If you can demonstrate a casual and testable link, then so be it, but that has never been done, and if it hasn't been done by now after the hundreds of billions of dollars spent on research, it's very unlikely to be.

HaMar 21 2014 08:50 PM

Ilma, I think you'd have a hard time explaining many of th bogus terms that radicals come up with. They are meant to tug on people's heart strings and to brainwash people.

It you can figure out what carbon pollution is, then you can maybe start to figure out what "climate disruption" is.

Sense WillwinMar 22 2014 05:25 PM

Water is the very substance of life. Without it we all die. Yet too much can kill us. Even relatively small amounts can harm us - waterboarding anyone?

CO2 has been added to the atmosphere for decades and lasts for centuries. It is beginning to swamp the planet's ability to absorb it. The more CO2 that stays in the atmosphere, the more world temperatures will rise. As temperatures rise, weather becomes more extreme.

Jan freedMar 23 2014 02:31 AM

I love it when arm chair scientists lecture us. It seems there is no limit to their arrogance.

Stop PollutionMar 25 2014 01:45 PM

Ilma, the word is "causal" not "casual" and I think people would be more likely to believe you if you could get it right.

NRDC are not 'arm chair' scientists. They work in the field in dozens of countries where the poor cannot insulate themselves from the consequences of climate change they are already facing.

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Send Me Updates About: Frances Beinecke

As new content on your chosen topic gets posted, you'll receive an automated email via FeedBurner. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Feeds: Frances Beinecke’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In