skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Clean Power plan
Safe Chemicals

Frances Beinecke’s Blog

50 Years after Silent Spring, Chemical Industry Still Trying to Deny Science

Frances Beinecke

Posted September 28, 2012

, , , , , , , ,
Share | | |

Fifty years ago, Rachel Carson helped launch the modern environmental movement with the publication of Silent Spring. She was a woman ahead of her time who saw before others the urgent need to rid our nation, our bodies, and our ecosystems of toxic chemicals.

When she first raised the alarm, Carson was vilified by the chemical industry and the Agricultural Department and called "hysterical and unqualified.”  Her information was described as "oversimplified” and “filled with downright errors and scary generalization."

Thanks to Carson’s fortitude and people’s outrage, the truth prevailed, and Congress finally banned DDT. Yet five decades later, industry-funded attacks on science continue unabated.

Rachel Louise Carson (1907-1964)

Just this spring, the Chicago Tribune exposed the joint efforts by the tobacco industry and chemical industry to drown out scientific evidence linking flame retardants to cancer, developmental delays, and fertility problems. Tobacco companies and chemical manufacturers flooded the field with industry-sponsored studies and publicized grossly misleading conclusions. They even hired a burn doctor who repeatedly lied during testimony, literally fabricating stories of small babies dying from fires.

Carson would recognize these anti-science tactics, especially those reaching all the way to Congress. Last year, the National Toxicology Program released the latest addition of the Report on Carcinogens, a congressionally mandated, science-based report identifying chemicals and substances that could increase the risk of cancer. The report listed formaldehyde as a carcinogen and styrene—a component in plastics as “reasonably anticipated” to cause cancer.

The report unleashed a wave of industry backlash. Chemical companies said the findings and methodology were flawed. The styrene industry is suing the Department of Health and Human Services. The industry is working with House Republicans to defund the report until the National Academy of Sciences can review the formaldehyde and styrene findings. And the American Chemistry Council wants to suspend the Report on Carcinogens entirely.

People respect and rely on the Report on Carcinogens. It is the government’s only document focused entirely on which substances cause cancer in humans, and independent scientists, health groups, workers, veterans, and businesses depend on its findings. Having the chemical industry shut it down is the equivalent of the tobacco industry calling a “suspension” of the surgeon general’s report on the health risks of smoking.

One way to combat industry’s anti-science campaigns is to have strong national toxics law. Unfortunately, the Toxic Substances Control Act passed in 1976 isn’t up to the job. When the law was passed, 62,000 chemicals were grandfathered in without testing. And rather than calling on chemical manufacturers to prove the safety of their products before use, TSCA requires the Environmental Protection Agency to prove that a chemical is unsafe before it can be restricted. In more than 30 years, the EPA has required testing of about 200 chemicals and partially regulated five.

We need a comprehensive reform of the Toxic Substances Control Act in order to put scientific evidence—and not chemical industry influence—at the heart of America’s safeguards against toxics.

A stronger version of the Toxic Substances Control Act would require all chemicals to be tested for safety and put the burden of proof on the chemical industry to demonstrate that a chemical is safe. It would establish safety standards for chemicals using the latest scientific knowledge to protect children and other vulnerable or over-exposed sub-populations. And it would promote innovation and transition to safer alternatives, including less dangerous chemicals and non-chemical alternatives.

Many lawmakers are committed to safeguarding our families from hazardous chemicals, yet in order to push back against industry influence, they need to know the American people are behind them. Click here to urge your senators to co-sponsor the Safe Chemicals Act.

Now more than ever, we must follow Carson’s example: listen to the research, raise our voices, and hold companies and politicians accountable.



Share | | |


Andi C. TomaszewskiSep 28 2012 04:15 PM

It is shameful that companies and industries are allowed to suppress important information that people have a right to know. And it's also shameful that they are allowed to continue producing products that are known to cause cancer. Shame on the government for allowing it and the industries for not caring about anything other than profits, while millions of people get cancer every year.

thomas wileySep 28 2012 09:17 PM

What do we expect when all is holy is the bottom line ? Smoking is ok , modified foods are ok , dumping tons of cap in the air is ok and the list goes on . It is enough to make you cry when you see your loved ones cut down by cancer.

BellaBlueSep 29 2012 07:43 AM

My grandfather wrote a book in 1966, "That We May Live", as a direct response to "Silent Spring". The books' purpose was to address "unjustified public fears of those invaluable chemicals called pesticides". My grandfather was a U.S. House Representative for 53 years and served as chairman of the Agriculture subcommittee on Appropriations for 46 years. I truly believe his heart was in the right place. In the years prior to the book being written, the cranberry market nearly collapsed because of fears of pesticides & cancer spoken about by Eisenhower's staff. In addition, my grandfather had nearly died in the 1930's from drinking raw milk, so he knew the consequences of tainted foods. Jamie was always a friend of all farmers and dedicated his life to helping them. --- My grandfather passed away in 1995, when I was 25 years old. I hadn't yet gained my passion for the environment. Now that I am older and "a bit" wiser, I understand how invaluable Ms. Carson's work and passions are to the world. I am now an environmental advocate. I often wonder what my grandfather would think about corporate agriculture, which seemed to rise dramatically in the years after my his passing, and the troubling state of our planet today. I love to imagine that he would be fighting the good fight against corporate interests. Regardless, I am grateful to have learned so much from Rachel Carson about the delicate "nature" of our planet, and I am proud that my grandfather, however misguided, stood up for and represented the small farmers of this country. Let's just hope that all citizens of the world will win out over corporate interests that drive the denial of science.

Trips A'plentySep 30 2012 12:05 PM

if you dont like private companies doing what they wantthen you hate the free market and must be a socialist.

Comments are closed for this post.


Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit

Feeds: Frances Beinecke’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In