skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Clean Power plan
Safe Chemicals

Elly Pepper’s Blog

January/February 2013 Threats to the Endangered Species Act

Elly Pepper

Posted February 28, 2013

, ,
Share | | |

I know I’ve missed a few months of this blog, but there was nothing to report! With the country’s focus on elections, there wasn’t a ton of action on the Hill. But with the elections and inauguration over, Congress is back to business, which for many Members means back to attacking the Endangered Species Act.

Here are the legislative threats to the ESA we saw over the past two months:

  • Rep. Jones (R-NC) reintroduced his bill (H.R. 819) from last congress that would block implementation of a National Park Service plan that protects beach-nesting piping plovers -- a threatened species -- and sea turtles, from vehicles at Cape Hatteras. Prior to the NPS plan, high vehicle traffic on Cape Hatteras beaches not only interrupted bird and sea turtle nesting and feeding patterns, but it also killed these species directly by crushing them. If Rep. Jones has his way, Cape Hatteras will revert back to this state.
  • Sen. Cornyn (R-TX) introduced a bill (S. 19) that gives the oil and gas industry, corporations, and local politicians the power to veto settlements aimed at protecting our country’s endangered animals and plants. The so-called “Endangered Species Act Settlement Reform Act” includes a provision to grant any corporation the ability to intervene in a settlement over species protections between the government and a citizen or nonprofit group. It would also give state and local politicians veto power over agreements designed to save species from extinction.
  • Sen. Vitter (R-LA) introduced the “Energy Production and Project Delivery Act of 2013” (S. 17) which, among a host of terrible provisions, would prevent the consideration of greenhouse gases for ESA listings. It would also gut ESA protections in the Bay-Delta for native salmon, steelhead, and other listed species. Rep. Bishop (R-UT) has announced that he’ll introduce a companion bill.
  • While not a bill, the “Energy Vision” Sen. Murkowski (R-AK) released in early February would negatively affect every aspect of our environment – from our lands, to our oceans, to our forests. Provisions affecting endangered species include changes to the ESA that would make it more difficult to list species and more difficult to ensure that the government and others are complying with the ESA. 

That’s all for now!



Share | | |


danny blevinsFeb 28 2013 05:46 PM

Dear Elly Pepper, Your comment about the Cape Hatteras National Seashore and what was happening on the beaches before the new driving regulations is misleading. The only known cases of wildlife that were run over by vehicles were done by national park service vehicles themselves.Those that live or visit Hatteras on a regular basis have always loved, respected and protected the wildlife on the beaches.Maybe you should do some research and stop getting your info from false sources such as Auduboun. I greatly respect what you are doing for natures wildlife but,please stop making it sound like the people of Hatteras are willfully and without regard killing animals by driving on the beach.You could not meet a more respectful, caring and love of nature group of people in the whole world.

Desiree Di MauroMar 4 2013 10:04 AM

Thanks for the info on the piping plover. I thought you might like to see my latest post about the birds on my blog -- I included a mention of the Hatteras bill:

Comments are closed for this post.


Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit

Feeds: Elly Pepper’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In