skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Eric Goldstein’s Blog

First Impressions of New York's New Environmental Study of Fracking

Eric Goldstein

Posted September 7, 2011 in Curbing Pollution

Tags:
, , , , ,
Share | | |

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation today released its long-awaited Revised Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement, detailing the Cuomo Administration’s controversial proposal for industrial gas drilling in the state’s portion of the Marcellus Shale, using the technique known as high-volume hydraulic fracturing, or fracking.

As readers of my colleagues Frances Beinecke’s and Kate Sinding’s blogs already know, the fracking issue has generated great interest and concern in New York State.  And poorly regulated fracking activities in Pennsylvania and across the country have been linked to a host of serious environmental woes.

With such a backdrop, the draft study released today is the most important environmental impact statement prepared by New York State in recent years.  Recognizing the high stakes involved, NRDC will be scrutinizing the more than 1,500 page document with exceptional care, and we encourage concerned citizens across the state to do the same.  In addition, NRDC and our experts will be preparing detailed comments on the draft EIS.

As previously noted, NRDC recognizes that elements of the state’s new proposal are stronger than the Paterson Administration’s fatally flawed 2009 draft analysis. But we continue to believe that fracking should not move forward in New York unless and until it is demonstrated that New Yorkers' health and environment would be protected.

Our first impression of the new draft environmental study is that it has left a boatload of unresolved issues and unanswered questions in its wake.

Here are four quick examples:

  • Fracking in Floodplains – The recent and tragic flooding in the Catskills and other parts of upstate New York following Tropical Storm Irene is further proof, if any is needed, that floodplains are no place for industrial activities, including gas drilling.  While the state is correctly proposing to prohibit well-pad development in floodplains, it would apparently allow other fracking-related activities (infrastructure, holding ponds, etc) in and under such areas. 
  • Impacts on Local Communities from Rapid Industrialization – The state’s draft study does not provide an effective mechanism to insure that local communities will be protected from the overwhelming industrial onslaught that comes with fracking (from heavy drilling and excavating equipment, to traffic, air and water pollution, and the like) should drilling proceed in a particular area. 
  • Disposal of Hazardous Fracking Wastewaters – There are currently no wastewater treatment plants in New York State equipped to treat wastewaters from high-volume fracking operations.  And the draft study is unacceptably vague on what will become of the tens of millions of gallons of toxic wastewaters produced in NYS if fracking operations move forward here.
  • Continuing Threats to NYC and Syracuse Water Supply Infrastructure – While wisely proposing to place the unfiltered New York City and Syracuse watersheds off limits to fracking, the draft study provides very limited protection, if any, to the critical aqueducts and tunnels that carry water from our reservoirs.  From a public health and emergency preparedness standpoint, allowing risky drilling activities to occur near aging and vulnerable water supply infrastructure is an unreasonable risk.

Today’s release of the completed draft environmental study begins a 96 day public comment period, which will run until December 12th.  Originally, the Department had planned for a 60 day comment period.  But NRDC and our environmental colleagues, recognizing the complexity and importance of this proceeding, petitioned the agency to extend the time for public review.

In a troubling procedural development, the DEC revealed today that it will propose draft rules to govern the as-yet-to-be-determined fracking program even before the environmental review is complete. The proposed rules will apparently be released in October and the comment period is scheduled to conclude in December, at the same time as the comment period on the environmental study.  But this is putting the cart before the horse.  The core purpose of the EIS process is to inform the decision-making process before decisions are made.  This rapid schedule places an unreasonable time burden on the public and seems to favor expedited rulemaking over the careful and measured approach to gas drilling that the DEC had been promising.

According to today’s announcement, four public hearings will be held around the state, including one in New York City. 

Hold onto your hats, folks.  The forthcoming public review process is going to be a wild and bumpy ride.

Share | | |

Comments

RyanSep 7 2011 06:21 PM

I do not understand how our state and federal governments are not stepping in on this. Regardless of how much money this is going to create are they even considering how much we are going to spend to clean this up if it goes wrong. WHICH IT WILL. There are no scientific results showing clean and safe ways of doing this. I am in shock that people can be so careless and callous. I love New York but if they allow this I do not know if I can allow myself to live here anymore. I do not want contaminated water (and that is the least of my worries)

Clinton DawkinsSep 7 2011 06:47 PM

I did not vote for Andrew Cuomo, and will not do so.

J. W. FrankSep 7 2011 11:04 PM

Please be aware that the NY State Budget will be dealt with in Jan. 2012. That is the real deadline in all this.

All dsgeis comments end in December- The DEC press release leads with projected income/jobs #'s (max. after 10 years if you read the fine print).

Thus:
Cuomo will incorporate the DECs projected jobs #s (after 10 yrs. of drilling, but nevermind that) into the 2012 budget and appropriate and spend based on those #'s. That's how the sausage is made. Once those appropriations are locked in to the budget, we are fracked.

Smoke. Meet mirror.

PaulSep 8 2011 02:01 PM

I find it incredible how during a time of over 9% inflation people can find fault in every single item that seeks to benefit our country. The Federal EPA has found no fault with fracking itself....it's occurs thousands of feet below the water table ...

Your organization all others a like seek to stop anything and everything that helps America become energy independent and foster growth....

The same people stopped the Nuclear industry and no in hindsight it would staved off millions of metric tons of waste being spewed into the air vs a few hundred pounds of radioactive waste....was that worth it??? Even the head of Greenpeace wrote a huge article saying how wrong it was....

your organization is disgraceful

Ron BartoloSep 9 2011 07:58 AM

Paul, you are not entitled to your own facts. The "over 9% inflation" number you cite is ludicrous and absolutely false.

The NRDC is not advocating stopping hydrofacking altogether. Are you a natural gas drilling company shill? Not sure how your stance is any better...

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Eric Goldstein’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In