skip to main content

Natural Resources Defense Council

Switchboard

Erin Allweiss's Blog

Shale Baby Shale? The clock strikes 12.

Shale Baby Shale? The clock strikes 12.

 At midnight tonight, the moratorium banning offshore drilling will expire, allowing oil companies to drill as close as three miles from our shores. The energy debate devolved into a narrow argument over drilling, which my colleague Rob Perks addresses in his blog.

The calls for "drill baby drill" provided enough distraction for some members of Congress to push through the expiration of another moratorium - this one on oil shale.  According to many of our experts at NRDC, the potential impact of this development could be far worse than drilling for oil.

Oil shale, which is found in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming, releases four times the amount of global warming pollution as conventional fuel. It can be converted into liquid petroleum and then transportation fuel, but only after being heated to 900 degrees for five years or more. It's also a technology that is largely untested.

Jad Mouawad writes about oil shale  in the New York Times blog Green Inc.

It is mind boggling that instead of investing in our nation's green infrastructure, Big Oil allies in Washington would work to lease more than 2 million acres of public land to develop this energy intensive fuel.

Many in the House and Senate worked to keep this important moratorium in place. Senators Reid and Byrd offered an amendment to prevent the Department of Interior from leasing federal land for oil shale production. Although the bill to keep the ban failed by 8 votes, it sets a mark for the 111th Congress and our new president to reinstate this vital moratorium and start investing in a clean energy future that will create jobs and jumpstart our economy.

Tags:
congress, globalwarming, moratorium, offshoredrilling, oil, oilshale

(bookmark or email this entry)

Comments

Dave ReidSep 30 2008 07:54 PM

Wait to get usable transportation oil out of this shale it has to be heated at 900 degrees for FIVE years?? Seems to me there must be a better option then wasting time and money on this stuff.

Erin AllweissOct 1 2008 09:15 AM

There is a better option, and it's investing in clean, homegrown energy that will make us less dependent on oil. Producing oil shale will only make us rely more on dirty fuels, which is why the next president and Congress need to do all they can to reinstate the moratorium.

Dennis KnicelyOct 1 2008 04:51 PM

Drilling for oil, and this shale development have to stop. Drilling has already done enough damage. Go to:
http://www.rootsofdemocracy.com/fracing_hydraulic_fracture.html
"Drilling for Oil Destroys the Environment"

Enough said - Dennis
http://www.RootsofDemocracy.com
http://www.HealingNews.com

Comments are closed for this post.

We close comments on a blog post when it's clear the conversation has moved on -- click on the tags (above) or on our homepage to see if we've got fresh news and views on this post's topic.

Clean Energy Common Sense

OnEarth: NRDC's award-winning magazine

Citizen journalism from the OnEarth magazine website

The End of the Tour But the Beginning of the Fight
by Rocky Kistner
The Arctic Circle: Science at the End of the Earth
by David Rothenberg
Road to Copenhagen: Fears Arise Outside Closed Doors
by Ben Jervey

Read more

Fresh Conversation

Feeds: Stay Plugged In