Seven Bipartisan Fixes to Our Transportation Problems
Posted May 19, 2011 in Moving Beyond Oil
Here in D.C. we often bemoan the fact that we can’t all just get along. But when it comes to transportation, we actually CAN get along. And now we’ve got it in writing. A new joint report by three organizations from all points in the political spectrum -- the left-leaning Transportation for America, the centrist Taxpayers for Common Sense, and the right-leaning Reason Foundation, points out seven taxpayer-friendly solutions for national transportation problems.
These fixes are economical, good for the environment, and everyone can agree on them. I’ve been writing about several of these solutions in my blog, such as Bus Rapid Transit, Intelligent Transportation Systems, telecommuting, high-occupancy toll lanes and intercity buses.
A couple of other fixes are perhaps less familiar, such as scenario planning. Scenario planning requires regions and states to do what any good business does – develop multiple scenarios of future growth, figure out what scenario works best, and plan for it accordingly. It seems like common sense, but very few states and regions actually do this.
The Thomas Jefferson District Planning Commission in central Virginia, is one of the few that has used this tool. They used scenario planning to develop a vision of growth that required half the transportation investment and reduced congestion 24 percent compared to their business as usual scenario. Scenario planning gives local officials a goal to work toward when creating policy, rather than merely trying to accommodate a single, inflexible vision of growth. It’s a far better use of taxpayer dollars.
Local street connectivity is another tool that everybody thinks is a good idea. What this means is using more grids instead of cul-de-sacs. Have you ever been in one of those developments where there’s only one big arterial road, with no sidewalk or bike lane, that connects dozens of residential developments? There’s only one road for everyone to get anywhere. In some places you have to get on the interstate just to get to your grocery store. A grid system gives you a lot more ways to get from A to B, and that improves traffic flow.
Cities across the country, like Cary, North Carolina, and Austin, Texas, have instituted new requirements for street connectivity. Delaware and Virginia have state requirements for new developments to meet minimum connectivity ratios. The Virginia Department of Transportation says encouraging builders to meet these requirements will help avoid costly highway expansions.
Lawmakers should pay close attention to these solutions as Congress works on the next transportation bill. They are fiscally responsible and environmentally beneficial, and should command the respect of the left and the right.
Comments are closed for this post.




Comments
Paul F. Burke — May 19 2011 07:13 PM
Years ago, Mr Alweg and his engineers buit a monorail in Seattle, Washington and it is still there.
Mr. Alweg wanted to do the same thing in the city of Los Angeles but the gas hogs said that it simply would not happen.
So much for wonderful progress.
But it did not stop ol' Walt Disney 'cause he built a monorail at Disneyland and at Walt Disney World in Florida and it covers some 14 miles.
It can serve as a working model if they would want it too for a monorail in the U.S. cities. There are just cars all about the place and not enough linear feet of road to put 'em on. FIX IT.
Willie Green — May 20 2011 08:50 PM
The report should actually be titled "Seven diversions from addressing our REAL transportation infrastructure challenges"
Our present transportation infrastructure evolved around the abundant availability of petroleum based, fossil fuels. And in the coming years, as global consumption depletes relatively cheap, tradional source, production is shifting to more costly "unconventional" oil shales and tar sands.
Like it or not, this paradign shift in the cost of fuel WILL dictate a similar shift to more affordable transportation. This IS what will drive consumer demand for passenger rail systems: light rail for local commuters... high speed rail to displace regional, short-hop commuter airlines.
This report fails to address this unavoidable megatrend.