skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Deron Lovaas’s Blog

Questioning the Commuter Parking Subsidy

Deron Lovaas

Posted January 10, 2013 in Living Sustainably, Moving Beyond Oil

Tags:
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Share | | |

As you may have heard, after a lapse Congress restored parity between drivers and transit riders when it comes to non-taxable commuting costs. Good articles have been written about this laudable turn of events here and here.

As of this year drivers get to shelter $240 per month from taxes, or nearly $3,000 annually. Thanks to the 2009 Recovery Act, the benefit for those of us who take transit jumped to the same level as drivers until last fiscal year (or FY, and for the feds these begin 10/1 of the preceding year), when it dropped to just $125 monthly. Congress made benefit parity retroactive so transit commuters get equal footing with drivers for both 2012 and 2013 FYs. As I type this, the IRS and HR departments are working to figure out how exactly retroactive implementation works!

This transit benefit seems to attract attention fairly frequently. It's puzzling that the parking benefit escapes similar questioning.

For starters, transit ridership delivers societal and environmental benefits and so is worth promoting. For example, taking the bus or train to work, especially if the vehicle is reasonably well-loaded, yields substantial fuel savings and pollution reduction as you can see from the graph below based on national average vehicle efficiencies.

gallons_per_passenger_mile.jpgThe other reason to turn the spotlight on the parking benefit is that it is much, much larger. How much bigger? According to the IRS, in 2012 alone the parking benefit cost $3.18 billion, whereas transit cost $520 million. So subsidizing parking cost taxpayers more than six times as much. That's where the big potential fiscal savings are vis-a-vis commuter benefits.

So a smart policy move -- fiscally and environmentally -- would be to keep the transit benefit but eliminate the parking one.

However, if parity is the name of the game here, so there's a level playing field between modes of transportation, it may make more sense instead to provide some benefit to those who take carpools or vanpools to work too. And a smaller benefit could be provided to the hardy souls who bike to work daily (say $50). This would presumably have a modestly bigger fiscal effect, but the societal and environmental payoffs could trump that.

Or to even the playing field even more the feds could offer, as California does, "parking cashout." Employees are given a flat monthly benefit for commuting expenses, and they decide what to do with it. There's good analytical evidence that cashout amounts to an economic incentive for not driving alone to work, which stands to reason since if I bike or walk (or telecommute, as I'm doing today), I pocket some of that money for uses other than buying gasoline.

Such alternatives are worth considering, given the benefits. And if fiscal savings is top priority, we should really question whether we should continue pouring billions of our taxpayer dollars into exacerbating peak road commuting hours.

Share | | |

Comments

Michael BerndtsonJan 10 2013 05:30 PM

Maybe Mayor Emmanuel told Obama to keep that in after former mayor of Chicago Richard M. Daley's parking privatization fiasco almost caused every driver in Chicagoland to vote Republican.

Donald ShoupJan 11 2013 02:11 PM

Here is the link to a short video that shows how well parking cash out works in California:

http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/03/24/views-from-the-summit-parking-rock-star-donald-shoup-blasts-l-a-s-parking-policies/

Deron LovaasJan 11 2013 07:08 PM

Don -- Thanks for posting the video, and I have to say as a shoupista (http://www.facebook.com/groups/70015940360/) I'm very happy to see you comment on switchboard! Best, Deron

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Deron Lovaas’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In