skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Keystone XL Pipeline
Defending the Clean Air Act

Deron Lovaas’s Blog

Key to Curing Our Oil Addiction: New Clean Energy Law

Deron Lovaas

Posted April 16, 2010 in Moving Beyond Oil

Tags:
, , , , , , , , ,
Share | | |

My friend Jim Woolsey writes rightly about ending America’s oil addiction in the Wall Street Journal.

His four-part solutions set is also reasonable, if incomplete – more efficient car technology, greater use of natural gas in where appropriate in the vehicle fleet (click here for a fact sheet on why there’s a better way to go with most vehicles), making sure cars can run on low-carbon, sustainable biofuels as well as gasoline, and electrifying our car and truck fleet.

But where Jim is badly off-the-mark is his throwaway line on legislation that would cap pollution and sell a limited number of permits to polluters. Putting such a policy in place could actually cut our current oil import level in half. Here’s how:

  • It makes smart, serious investments in deployment of the solutions Jim names. With cars and trucks, legislation would complement the national vehicle greenhouse gas and fuel economy program launched by the Obama Administration, which is raising the bar for performance of the fleet in the coming decades, and assuming it keeps rising you and me could save serious money at the gas pump and the nation could save two million barrels a day by 2030. By sending the signal that the U.S. is serious about moving away from oil it will make all three options cited by Jim -- natural gas, biofuels and electricity -- more competitive. And it should include performance-based manufacturer financing and consumer incentives to speed up commercialization of these new fuel choices.
  • Second, there’s an overlooked effect a bill would have, one marrying safe capture and disposal of carbon pollution with recovery of additional oil from “dry wells.” A tried-and-true industry technique for boosting the recovery rate in such cases happens to be injection of pollution underground. The potential is very large -- more than 3 million barrels a day by 2030 -- as this analysis commissioned by NRDC shows.
  • Third, as my colleague Andy Stevenson notes, a policy that clamps down on oil and carbon pollution would leverage private sector action, spurring a near-doubling of investments in clean energy technology – including the items on Jim’s list -- from now until 2030. That’s a $13 trillion market, and U.S. industry needs the right policy context for growing into a net exporter in it, generating almost two million new jobs in the process.

So with new clean energy policy driving cleaner cars and more domestic production we can cut our current oil import level in half and launch a clean energy revolution. This is our moment, and I look forward to working with Jim and other allies to capitalize on it.

Share | | |

Comments

FedupnetworkApr 16 2010 01:20 PM

The term addiction is manipulative jargon to mislead the less educated about how important oil is to our economy. Addiction destroys lives and families. Oil does neither. It enhances our lives and enables us to be mobile. If it were up to you, we would all be back to using whale oil... wait. They are on the endangered species list, aren't they? WAKE UP! There is plenty of oil to use and give us time to find a reasonable alternative until all of us start plugging in our cars at night. Better think nuclear!

Deron LovaasApr 16 2010 01:35 PM

First of all, no one is advocating for eliminating oil use, period. But we need to get serious about slashing our overdependence, especially in transportation.

Having a transportation system undergirding our economy that is more than 95 percent dependent on the stuff is unwise, to put it very mildly. Especially when your projection is just one of many about oil's future (see http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/u-s-military-warns-of-oil-shortage-as-early-as-2015/19442647), and when the vast majority of oil reserves are in the hands of nations that may not care much about U.S. interests (many of which collude via OPEC) not private companies.

We need policy to drive us to a less dependent, more secure future, one where we have multiple vehicle, energy and mobility choices as opposed to having no alternative but to fuel up on oil-, oil-, or oil-derived fuels.

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Deron Lovaas’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In