skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Christina Angelides’s Blog

The Public Supports Light Bulb Standards--It's Time Congress Listened

Christina Angelides

Posted June 6, 2012 in Curbing Pollution, Solving Global Warming

Tags:
, , , , , , , , ,
Share | | |

The public strongly supports energy efficiency standards for light bulbs that were passed with bipartisan support in Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2007 and went into effect this year. As poll after poll shows, and many homeowners and businesses have reported, Americans like the standards and are already using better-performing, more energy-efficient light bulbs.  So why are some in Congress still trying to turn out the lights on these standards?

Yesterday, House Republicans passed two dim amendments to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 energy and water appropriations bill to undermine these standards.  The first, sponsored by Rep. Burgess (R-TX), prevents the Department of Energy (DOE) from using any funds to enforce the standards.   The U.S. lighting industry and business, consumer, environmental, and other groups solidly oppose the amendment.  The second, sponsored by Rep. Cravaack (R-MN), blocks DOE from requiring its grant recipients to upgrade any lighting that does not meet or exceed the standards.   

These amendments are based on the flawed assumption that new efficiency standards mean that incandescent bulbs are banned.  This rabble rousing accusation is popular among those looking to obfuscate the facts for political gain, but the truth is that incandescent bulbs are not banned--they are just getting better.  Already, U.S. lighting companies like GE, Philips and Sylvania are producing new incandescents that meet these standards.  Consumers will also have the option to buy CFLs and LEDs that provide even greater savings. 

Not only will the standards help the average family save approximately $100 a year on their electric bill, but they are also supporting our nation’s growing energy-efficient lighting industry and creating thousands of jobs across the country.  There are currently 14,000 workers employed in the energy-efficient lighting industry, according to the Brookings Institution, and companies such as GE Lighting and TCP in Ohio, Osram Sylvania in Pennsylvania, Cree in North Carolina and Philips Lighting in New York and other states are developing and manufacturing energy-efficient bulbs.   Our air quality will also improve with our light bulbs, because when our light bulbs use less electricity, our power plants produce less pollution.  When fully implemented, the standards will achieve energy savings equivalent to 30 large power plants.

It’s worrisome enough that House Republicans would risk hurting U.S. manufacturers and put thousands of jobs in jeopardy at a time when our country needs them most.  What’s even more troubling though is that their actions are completely out of step with the majority of Americans.

Consider these polls from the last year:

A USA Today national poll from February 2011 shows that consumers are increasingly buying the energy-savings bulbs and that 84 percent of those surveyed were very satisfied or satisfied with the new bulbs.  In addition, there was strong consumer support for the federal lighting standards that will bring them better and more energy-efficient lighting choices.  A majority of consumers, 61 percent, support the light bulb efficiency standards that were passed as part of the 2007 energy bill.

Approval of Law to Set Light Bulb Efficiency Standards

 USA Today Poll pic.PNG 

 As you may know, in 2007, Congress passed a law to set higher energy standards for light bulbs.  This means standard light bulbs , or incandescent light bulbs, will be phased out in the next three years.  Do you think this is a good law or a bad law? [Gallup Poll, conducted February 15-16, 2011, n=1,016 adults]

EcoOpinion released a consumer survey in March 2011 that showed a majority of consumers have already adopted and are satisfied with energy efficient lighting.  The survey found that:

  • A majority of Americans have installed some type of energy efficient lighting in their homes.  Two-thirds of Americans have installed CFLS in their home over the past year, and 27 percent they have installed some sort of LED fixture in their home.
  • Consumers are very satisfied with more energy efficient lighting options.  Two-thirds of respondents gave CFL bulbs strong ratings and over half of Americans gave the highest ratings to LEDs.
  • Two-thirds of Americans think that it is a good idea to phase out the traditional incandescent light bulb and transition to more energy efficient lighting.

Consumers Union and NRDC conducted four state polls in Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, and Maine with Public Policy Polling in September 2011.  The polls again show that a majority of consumers have installed more energy-efficient appliances and products, including more energy-efficient lighting, and strongly support energy efficiency standards for light bulbs. 

Consumers are installing energy efficient appliances and products

NRDC Consumers Graph 1.PNG

The polls also show  that energy efficiency standards for light bulbs also receive strong support—69 percent in Illinois, 64 percent in Michigan, 60 percent in Ohio and 66 percent in Maine.

The public supports efficiency standards for light bulbs.

 NRDC Consumers Graph 2.PNG 

  • Voters strongly support setting minimum energy efficiency standards in general for various household products that save consumers money and provide better-performing options.  Energy efficiency standards generally are supported by 68 percent of voters in Illinois, 62 percent in Michigan, 61 percent in Ohio, and 67 percent in Maine.  

Voters strongly support minimum energy efficiency standards

 NRDC Consumer Graph 3.PNG 

  • There’s also strong bipartisan support across all four states for energy efficiency standards.  In Illinois, 85 percent of Democrats, 76 percent of independents, and 69 percent of Republicans; in Ohio, 80 percent of Democrats, 73 percent of independents, 68 percent of Republicans; and in Maine 86 percent of Democrats, 78 percent of independents, and 64 percent of Republicans.

Support for energy efficiency standards is bipartisan.

 NRDC Consumers Graph 4.PNG 

There’s good reason that voters resoundingly support these standards and more energy-efficient light bulbs—the consumer savings, the innovations and options in lighting, more U.S. jobs and less pollution. 

Our members of Congress should be standing up to preserve these consumer benefits and protect our U.S. lighting industry and the jobs it supports—not risking them to score political points.  The U.S. Senate still has the opportunity to do the right thing and stop this nonsense from continuing any further.

Share | | |

Comments (Add yours)

pdubJun 6 2012 05:50 PM

OK.. if
"Americans like the standards and are already using better-performing, more energy-efficient light bulbs"

What is the need for a ban, then?!!
If the new bulbs are so great and popular, people will presumably buy them.

Except they don't of course:
Energy saving is not the ONLY reason for buying a bulb you want to use.

And why did the manufacturers push the standards?
Why seek and welcome what you can or can't make? ;-)
Profits of course, from banning patent expired simple cheap popular bulbs, that people wont stop buying in any other way.

And btw those "allowed" incandescent replacements will be banned too on the 45 lumen per watt end regulation standard in phase 2 of EISA that starts after 2014 - which ban proponents like to keep VERY quiet about ;-)

p dubJun 6 2012 05:53 PM

(continued)
How regulations on buildings, cars, washing machines, light bulbs etc are wrong, whether from right or left wing ideology, taking the light bulb example:

Society energy usage savings are only around 1% of grid energy use on DoE etc stats as referenced below, with much more relevant generation, grid distribution and alternative consumption savings - and that is still not counting the manufacture, transport and recycle energy use of the more complex alternatives.

Certainly, consumers can make some usage savings from switching their most commonly used bulbs.
However, society laws are presumably made for society savings, as above: rather than clamping down on what light bulb Johnny wants to use in his bedroom.
Besides, the personal choice of paid-for product use is hardly
"wasting energy", compared to unnecessarily leaving products on.

Even if light bulbs - or other products - had to be targeted,
market competition or taxation policies are more relevant
(the latter can pay for price lowering subsidies on alternatives
as well as giving Govmt income - hello California),
with both policies not just keeping choice, but also being better at promoting innovation and saving more energy overall

Dunday.com
"The deception behind arguments used to ban light bulbs"

Ethel MertzJun 7 2012 07:39 PM

I was astounded to read your argument that this will hurt US Manufacturers of light bulbs. Surely you are aware that there are NO manufacturers of CFL light bulbs in the US. Sylvania is the only manufacturer of light bulbs in the US (apart froma few specialty bulb manufacturers) and they make halogen bulbs.

Wanna know WHY there are no US bulb manufacturers? Because there are so many damn regulations that it's a nightmare to produce anything in this country, thanks to idiot proposals such as this one.

Dick ReedDec 24 2013 12:23 PM

I wish the EPA would go away. Their non founded influence on our lives is over the top. I don't want anything to do with mercury bulbs that are hazardous to the environment when not disposed of properly by law. What a hassle ! I want my choices not made for me.

Join the Conversation

Comment on this post:

All pertinent comments offered in the spirit of civil conversation are welcome! Off-topic comments, commercial spam, obscenity and other rude behavior are not, and will be removed. We are also required to remove any express or implied statement endorsing or opposing any political party or candidate for political office. Valid email addresses are required. (NRDC respects your privacy; we will not use, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.)

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Christina Angelides’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In