skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Barry Nelson’s Blog

New USC Report Shows Promise of the Portfolio Approach

Barry Nelson

Posted March 11, 2013 in Living Sustainably, U.S. Law and Policy

Tags:
, , , , , , ,
Share | | |

Last week, the University of Southern California released an ambitious new report entitled “Water Supply Scarcity in Southern California: Assessing Water District Level Strategies,” which provides extensive support for the portfolio-based conceptual alternative developed by environmental groups, water agencies and business organizations.  Here are a few highlights:

The portfolio-based approach proposes an analysis of the trade-offs between investments in the Delta and investments in local water supplies designed to reduce reliance on the Delta.  The USC study explicitly addresses the need for such an analysis, stating that: “The Bay Delta Plan is proposing to construct twin tunnels to bypass the Delta, thereby reducing the Delta’s vulnerability and increasing the reliability of imported water for Southern California. With a projected cost of $23.7 Billion to be paid by user fees, this project could foreclose other water supply options for Southern California.”  (Page x.)  It goes on to state that: “Some investments, such as the SWP proposed tunnels will preclude others due to financial constraints.  Trade-off analysis and full-accounting (including energy and emissions intensity of options) should be included in such analyses.”  (Page 313) 

The report reinforces the practical reality of the trade-offs facing water managers by highlighting that for LADWP, “Moody’s ratings in 2012 already warns that ‘very high debt will require’ water price increases.  Price increases for a municipal agency can be politically contentious, subject to Mayoral-City Council conflicts and public opposition.” (Page xiii.)   It also concludes that “(t)he increasing price of imported water is a major factor in local water agency efforts to conserve water and to invest in new water supply sources.”  Page xi.  Clearly, given these financial realities, designing the right portfolio of Delta and local investments is important for Southern California water users.                                                          

The portfolio approach proposes ambitious investments to reduce reliance on imported water.  The USC study also highlights the risks of a high reliance on imported water:  “LADWP’s Achilles’ heel is its large dependence on imported water.”   It also highlights extensive planned investments to reduce this reliance, reporting that LADWP’s  “plans include over $600 M in recycling facilities; a share of $940 M in groundwater clean up, $110 M in stormwater capture, as well as sizable investments in conservation.” (Page xiii.)  The report highlights the effectiveness of these local strategies, concluding that “(t)he two strategies considered to be the most feasible across the scenarios [by SoCal water agencies at a series of workshops], and, therefore, the most robust, were recycling and stormwater capture.”

The portfolio approach includes a recommendation for greater integration of water agency operations and a Southern California regional conjunctive use strategy.  The USC report also recommends the development of a “Southern California Regional Groundwater Strategy” that is designed to advance “regional supply projects, including stormwater capture, conjunctive management, recycling and groundwater desalination projects.” (Page xxvii).                                                                                     

Finally and perhaps most importantly, the report recommends that state water planning efforts include the development of “a coordinated strategy for water management in the State that incorporates the State Water Project/Bay Delta Conservation Plan, climate change adaptation, water conservation, and water quality, and regional groundwater and other water supply strategies.  All of these elements require substantial investment to ensure a sustainable water supply future for the State.”

Read together, the conclusions and recommendations in this new report include striking parallels with the methodology of and elements in the portfolio-based approach. 

Share | | |

Comments

James Singmaster, III, Ph.d.Mar 11 2013 10:09 PM

Just wait until an earthquake busts open one or more of the NorCal water canals to SoCal. Then some will start wondering why SoCal has done next to nothing on getting drinking water from the Pacific, a pretty big reserve of water. Some how no one in SoCal seems aware of using the abundant sunshine in SoCal as an energy supply to distill clean water from the ocean. Mirror systems to concentrate sun light can be set up to 10,000 degs. F and that ought to be enough to distill a lot of ocean water.
Dr. J. Singmaster, III Environmental Chemist, Ret.

MikeMar 12 2013 02:03 PM

While claiming that excerpts from the USC report validates the portfolio-based conceptual alternative that features a single tunnel through the Delta, the author of this blog conveniently avoids a recommendation of the report regarding State water planning that states: "All of these elements require substantial investment to ensure a sustainable water supply future for the State." (Page xxvi)

Applying this recommendation to the single tunnel in the alternative proves that the report does not provide support since the single tunnel would not deliver the water needed by millions of acres of farmland and 25 million Californians that rely on water that passes through the Delta.

BDCP researchers have studied (http://baydeltaconservationplan.com/Libraries/Dynamic_Document_Library/EIR-EIS_Alternatives_Update_Fact_Sheet_3-6-12.sflb.ashx) various sizes of tunnels, including 3,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) that is the size of the single tunnel. Their conclusion is that a 3,000 cfs tunnel simply does not provide the water needed for users. A comparison of the single versus twin-tunnels can be found at http://swc.org/images/stories/SWC.TunnelComparison.FINAL.pdf.

The USC report focused on three Southern Californian water districts---Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Huntington Beach and Cucamonga Valley. None of these districts deliver water to farms. Individuals and groups who champion the single tunnel ignore the impacts it would have on California farmers. A recent analysis at www.farmwater.org/BDCP-NRDC_alt.pdf reveals that 750,000 acres of farmland would no longer have a water supply to produce the fresh fruits and vegetables that consumers seek in the marketplace. This is the unwelcomed result of a single tunnel.

Mike Wade
California Farm Water Coalition

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Barry Nelson’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In