skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Ben Chou’s Blog

Another Voice Says Most States Are Not Preparing for Climate Change

Ben Chou

Posted November 19, 2013 in Solving Global Warming, U.S. Law and Policy

Tags:
, , , , , , , ,
Share | | |

As a Columbia alum and someone who has written extensively about climate preparedness, I was pleasantly surprised when my alma mater’s Center for Climate Change Law recently released a report rating all 50 states’ planning for climate change impacts.  The team at Columbia analyzed how each state’s hazard mitigation plan, which is required by FEMA for states to be eligible for grants to help reduce disaster risks, considers the impact that climate change will have on the severity and frequency of natural disasters. 

As has become increasingly clear in recent years, the impacts of climate change are being felt across the country and with temperatures continuing to rise, these impacts are worsening.  Because climate change will bring more frequent and more intense natural disasters, including extreme heat, wildfires, droughts, floods, and hurricanes, states need to consider climate change in their planning to effectively prepare for these increasing disaster risks. 

The Columbia report also reinforces the work that NRDC is doing to ensure that states are preparing for climate impacts.  Last year, we released our Ready or Not report, where we looked comprehensively at how water-related climate impacts are being considered in all state-level planning, and classified each state accordingly.  The conclusions drawn from Columbia’s analysis are similar to those from our earlier study—most states are not preparing for the impacts of climate change.       

Results from NRDC’s Ready or Not report 

Ready or Not.png

Results by Columbia Center for Climate Change Law (as illustrated by Tim McDonnell at Climate Desk)

disaster-readiness-map-670.jpgNRDC also has been working directly to ensure that states are considering climate change risks in their hazard mitigation plans—the subject at the center of Columbia’s analysis.  In October 2012, we filed a petition with FEMA asking them to ensure that states address climate change risks in their hazard mitigation planning.  And last month we received an official response to our petition, in which FEMA committed to improving climate guidance for states.     

There is considerable work left to do to make sure that communities and states are preparing for the new climate normal.  We’ll continue to hold federal agencies like FEMA and others accountable for following through on their climate preparedness commitments, including those made recently in President Obama’s Climate Action Plan.  And we’ll continue to coordinate with other groups like Columbia’s Center for Climate Change Law to make sure that the message is heard loud and clear:  climate change is here, and we must do more to help all communities prepare.                              

Share | | |

Comments

Michael BerndtsonNov 19 2013 11:56 AM

Good stuff. From a previous post on Switchboard I wondered why Illinois wouldn't be more progressive on climate change induced natural disaster preparedness. It looks like a lot goes on in Illinois I'm not up to speed on. Probably since I'm still so pissed off about Daley and his parking meter privatization scheme that nothing else happening in the State matters. Illinois is like Chernobyl, Oklahoma, Texas and Saudi Arabia of the Midwest, with its energy generation and transportation. I never really thought of Illinois as an environmentally worried state. Now it's totally clear why there's pushback on progressive environmental plans.

Here's a summary of Illinois and energy from EIA - spelled out this way kind of blew me away.

http://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=il

Below is copied from the website linked above:

Illinois is a key transportation hub for crude oil and natural gas moving throughout North America, with over a dozen interstate natural gas pipelines, two natural gas market centers, several petroleum and petroleum product pipelines, and an oil port.

Illinois led the Midwest in crude oil refining capacity and ranked fourth in the Nation in 2011.

In 2010, Illinois ranked third in recoverable coal reserves at producing mines in the Nation.
With a production capacity of 1.5 billion gallons per year, Illinois is a top producer of ethanol; it ranked third in the United States in 2011.

Illinois ranked first in the Nation in 2010 in both generating capacity and net electricity generation from nuclear power; generation from its nuclear power plants accounted for 12 percent of the Nation’s total.

Annually, Illinois households use 129 million Btu of site energy per home, 44 percent more than the U.S. average. Lower utility rates compared to states with a similar climate result in Illinois households only spending 2 percent more for energy than the U.S. average, according to EIA's Residential Energy Consumption Survey.

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Ben Chou’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In