<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Andrew Wetzler's Blog: Moving Beyond Oil</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:switchboard.nrdc.org,2009:/blogs/awetzler//50</id>
   <updated>2009-10-28T18:52:19Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Enterprise 1.52</generator>

<entry>
   <title><![CDATA[Investor&rsquo;s Business Daily Misleads on Polar Bears]]></title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/investors_business_daily_misle.html" />
   <id>tag:switchboard.nrdc.org,2009:/blogs/awetzler//50.4532</id>
   
   <published>2009-10-27T18:30:14Z</published>
   <updated>2009-10-28T18:52:19Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Investor&rsquo;s Business Daily just published a foolish editorial about the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's recent proposal to designate over 200,000 square miles of Alaskan coast and sea ice as &ldquo;critical habitat&rdquo; for the State&rsquo;s beleaguered polar bear population.&nbsp; The...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Andrew Wetzler</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Moving Beyond Oil" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Saving Wildlife and Wild Places" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="U.S. Law and Policy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="1138" label="biogems" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="1742" label="criticalhabitat" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="8059" label="investorsbusinessdaily" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="381" label="polarbears" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/">
      <![CDATA[<p><em>Investor&rsquo;s Business Daily</em> just published a foolish <a href="http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=510309">editorial</a> about the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/">recent proposal</a> to designate over 200,000 square miles of Alaskan coast and sea ice as &ldquo;critical habitat&rdquo; for the State&rsquo;s beleaguered polar bear population.&nbsp; The editorial doesn&rsquo;t contain much in the way of actual substance, and what substance it does have is mostly bunk.&nbsp; Here&rsquo;s a sample:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The administration creates the mother of all protected habitats for a species whose numbers have increased since Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Wrong.&nbsp; In fact, not even close to being right.&nbsp; The global population of polar bears is thought to number between 20,000 and 25,000 individuals.&nbsp; No scientist of whom I&rsquo;m aware suggests that this number has increased since 2006, when <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Inconvenient_Truth">&ldquo;An Inconvenient Truth&rdquo;</a> was released.&nbsp; Way back in 2005, of the <a href="http://pbsg.npolar.no/en/status/status-table.html">19 recognized polar bear sub-populations</a>, 5 were thought to be declining, only 2 were thought be increasing, and five were thought to be stable.&nbsp; As for the rest, we simply didn&rsquo;t know.&nbsp; One of those declining populations, by the way, is in the Southern Beaufort Sea, where much of Alaska&rsquo;s polar bears are located.&nbsp; Today, the situation has only deteriorated.</p>
<p>The editorial also states:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>One of the nine critical errors Judge Michael Burton found in Gore's film was the claim that polar bears were drowning while searching for ice melted by global warming. The only drowned polar bears the court said it was aware of were four that died following a storm.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well, I can&rsquo;t speak to Judge Burton&rsquo;s ruling, but as a factual matter this is also wrong.&nbsp; In 2005 scientists did indeed spot four drowned polar bears in the Beaufort Sea <a href="http://www.mms.gov/alaska/ess/Poster%20Presentations/MarineMammalConference-Dec2005.pdf">during regular transect surveys</a> of the area and following an intense storm.&nbsp; But based on extrapolation from the area surveyed, they estimate that as many as 27 bears could have died.&nbsp; It was the first time in <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB113452435089621905-vnekw47PQGtDyf3iv5XEN71_o5I_20061214.html">over a quarter-century</a> that such a mass-drowning event had ever been recorded.&nbsp; In 2008 a large number of swimming bears was also <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/swim_for_your_lives.html">reported</a> in the same area.&nbsp; As sea ice continues to retreat farther from land and the distance polar bears need to swim grows, such mass drowning events are projected to increase, not only in the Beaufort Sea, but in other places as well.</p>
<p>If <em>Investor Business Daily </em>wants to editorialize about designating critical habitat for the polar bear, fine.&nbsp; But guys, get your facts straight first.</p>
<p><img src="http://alaska.usgs.gov/science/biology/polar_bears/images/pbear_swimming.jpg" width="471" height="346" /></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>We&apos;re way beyond foxes and henhouses here...</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/were_way_beyond_foxes_and_henh.html" />
   <id>tag:switchboard.nrdc.org,2008:/blogs/awetzler//50.1742</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-11T15:40:40Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-21T12:30:30Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[I&rsquo;m sitting in an airport on my way to Montana, but couldn&rsquo;t resist noting the unfolding scandal a the U.S. Minerals Management Service.&nbsp; Remember, these are the guys that the Bush Administration wants to let decide, without any independent scientific...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Andrew Wetzler</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Moving Beyond Oil" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Saving Wildlife and Wild Places" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="U.S. Law and Policy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="395" label="endangeredspecies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="396" label="endangeredspeciesact" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="3442" label="mineralsmanagementservice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/">
      <![CDATA[<p>I&rsquo;m sitting in an airport on my way to Montana, but couldn&rsquo;t resist noting the <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/were_way_beyond_foxes_and_henh.html">unfolding scandal</a> a the U.S. Minerals Management Service.&nbsp; Remember, <em>these</em> are the guys that the Bush Administration <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/a_giant_step_backwards_for_wil.html">wants to let decide</a>, without any independent scientific review, whether offshore drilling by oil companies companies complies with the Endangered Species Act.</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Those New Subaru Ads</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/those_new_subaru_ads.html" />
   <id>tag:switchboard.nrdc.org,2007:/blogs/awetzler//50.434</id>
   
   <published>2007-08-07T14:53:49Z</published>
   <updated>2007-09-09T20:10:55Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Anybody catch the new Subaru ad? You know, the one with the rugged environmentalist standing in front of a Subaru plant and talking about how green it is? You can find Subaru&amp;#39;s summary of its green manufacturing process here. Now...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Andrew Wetzler</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Moving Beyond Oil" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Saving Wildlife and Wild Places" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Solving Global Warming" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="363" label="cleancars" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="180" label="fueleconomy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="362" label="greenmanufacturing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="361" label="hybridvehicles" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="360" label="subaru" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="335" label="wildlife" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="364" label="wildlifehabitat" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Anybody catch <a href="http://jalopnik.com/cars/fred-bear,-walk-with-me,-down-to-my-wrx/ad-watch-subaru-is-kind-to-small-animals-and-the-environment-andoh-look-theres-a-deer-268945.php">the new Subaru ad</a>? You know, the one with the rugged environmentalist standing in front of a Subaru plant and talking about how green it is? You can find Subaru&#39;s summary of its green manufacturing process <a href="http://www.subarudrive.com/Sum05_SubaruDifference.htm">here</a>. Now look, I&#39;m a wildlife guy &mdash; in fact, I&#39;ve spent my entire career at NRDC protecting wild places and wildlife &mdash; so I&#39;m all in favor of Subaru designating part of their plant wildlife habitat and doing all the other things they do to manufacture cars in the most sustainable ways possible. But the thing is, Subaru cars actually get pretty mediocre gas mileage. My 2001 Subaru Forester, for instance, <a href="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/17279.shtml">gets 19 mpg in the city and 24 mpg on the highway</a> (2007 models are only slightly better). That&#39;s not awful, but compare it to the Toyota Highlander hybrid &mdash; a much bigger car &mdash; which gets 27 mpg in the city. So guys, huzzah for the green manufacturing, but can we have a Subaru hybrid please?</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

