skip to main content

Natural Resources Defense Council

Switchboard

Andrew Wetzler's Blog

Gray wolves lose protection in the Northern Rockies, but hopefully not for long

Gray wolves lose protection in the Northern Rockies, but hopefully not for long

As expected, today the Secretary of the Interior officially made available the final rule removing the Northern Rocky Mountain population of gray wolves from the list of federally endangered species in Montana and Idaho.  The rule will take effect 30-days after it is published (tomorrow) and will immediately open wolves in the region to state management which, in the case of Idaho, at least, will undoubtedly mean widespread killing

Besides being a really dumb policy, the delisting rule is also illegal.  NRDC and Earthjustice will be sending a 60-day notice of intent to sue letter with our allies tomorrow, when the rule is published, in which we lay out exactly why the rule does not work.  Here’s the cliff notes version:

  • The delisting plan arbitrarily relies on an old and outdated recovery target of 30 breeding pairs of wolves in Wyoming, Idaho, and Montana.   Not only was the adoption of these goals flawed at the time, but since then the science has become even more clear that a far larger population is needed to ensure recovery.
  • The notice of the proposed delisting didn’t give the public the opportunity to comment on many of its aspects, including its controversial plan to artificially relocate wolves from one population to another in order to promote genetic connectivity.
  • The delisting plan redefines wolves in the Northern Rocky Mountains as a “distinct population segment” and then strips them of protection—but in doing so the agency ignores the fact that wolves are protected as a species nationwide.  The plan also delists wolves in areas where they haven’t even arguably recovered, such as portions of Oregon and Washington.
  • The delisting plan erroneously finds that Montana’s and Idaho’s post-delisting wolf management plans are adequate to conserve wolves but these plans will, in fact, allow very aggressive wolf killing.  Idaho’s plan is particularly problematic and the state has already proposed a wolf hunting quota that would allow 40% of Idaho’s wolves to be killed;

There’s more of course, but this should give you flavor of the profound problems with delisting.  Make no mistake, wolf reintroduction and recovery in the region is one of the most remarkable conservation success stories of the last twenty years and we are very close to achieving real recovery.  But if this delisting plan goes forward, all of that could be lost and the viability of wolves in the Northern Rockies will suffer a severe blow.

Tags:
delisting, endangeredspecies, endangeredspeciesact, idaho, montana, wolf, wolves, wyoming, yellowstone

(bookmark or email this entry)

Comments

Laura AgostinoApr 3 2009 04:58 AM

I am totally against this new ruling and would very much hope that this ruling is reversed!

Wolves deserve to be protected!

Jack LockerApr 3 2009 01:45 PM

The major problem in RRR country and RRR world is the human war on Nature. This latest act of careless mismanagement against the recovering wolf population is a clear example of the interests of a morally bankrupt few being served.

Bella Las van BennekomApr 4 2009 02:56 AM

It's increadeble that human beings still think that they are superiour to animals!!
Keep you're hands off Nature and Wildlife!!
So stupid to follow an instict based on killing what suppose to be a life!!
Ignorance and stupidity are the base of these slaughter hunts!!
I'm a Defender of Wildlife member and I'll continue to spread the following words:
Stop killing wolves!! They were there before humang being. In this cases I'm a shamed that I belong to the human ras. Animals could and must kill for food, people kill for pleasure and space?!
Bella Las van Bennekom Amsterdam Netherlands

Zac AndersonApr 10 2009 11:45 AM

I think it is good that wolves are going to be delisted. Their popultions are now large and this will allow for states to manage populations. If you look at the biology and not just your fuzzy feelings for animals, you will see that wolf populations in the northern rockies are not in jeapordy.

Comments are closed for this post.

We close comments on a blog post when it's clear the conversation has moved on -- click on the tags (above) or on our homepage to see if we've got fresh news and views on this post's topic.

Clean Energy Common Sense

OnEarth: NRDC's award-winning magazine

Citizen journalism from the OnEarth magazine website

Day Five of No Impact Week: Lights Out
by Solvie Karlstrom
The Not-So-Badness of Guides to Green Living
by Emily Gertz
No Impact Week Day Four: Foreign Foods
by Solvie Karlstrom

Read more

Fresh Conversation

Feeds: Stay Plugged In