skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Andrew Wetzler’s Blog

Can Wildlife Services and Conservationists be Friends?

Andrew Wetzler

Posted August 12, 2013

Tags:
, , , , , , ,
Share | | |

Here at NRDC we’ve long been critical of Wildlife Services, the U.S. Department of Agriculture agency that kills tens of thousands of native carnivores like coyotes, wolves, foxes, and badgers every year, mostly at the behest of the livestock industry.  These practices are unnecessary, often indiscriminate, and ecologically damaging.

But not everything the agency does is bad.  Wildlife Services works to eradicate or control invasive species, from feral hogs to brown tree snakes, and to protect public safety by keeping birds clear of airports.

Even when it comes to the agency’s dysfunctional “livestock protection program,” there are bright spots.  Last week, the USDA Blog highlighted the work of Wildlife Services agents in Montana to help ranchers adopt practices that prevent conflicts between native wildlife and livestock, without the need to resort to killing.

Wildlife Services has assisted us to build electrified pens to put our sheep into at night to protect them from wolves and grizzly bears.  They have placed livestock guard dogs on our colony to study how dogs can help protect our sheep and cattle.

These are precisely the kind of conflict-prevention techniques that NRDC has long promoted -- helping ranchers put them into practice is a worthy mission for a federal agency.  In fact, like Wildlife Services, NRDC is also Ben Hofer, Rockport Colony Secretary, with a Kangal. NWRC researchers are studying the potential of these livestock guard animals for use where large predators include wolves and grizzly bear. (USDA Photo by Under Secretary Edward Avalos) helping Montana ranchers build electrified fences and employ the use of “range riders” to keep wolves and bears clear of conflicts with cattle.

Of course, many problems remain.  Despite claims to the contrary, the fact is, when it comes to “protecting” livestock, 98% of Wildlife Services activities involves killing native wildlife. But it’s heartening to see the agency assisting ranchers with nonlethal practices and trumpeting these efforts.  

Maybe conservationists and Wildlife Services can be friends, after all.

 

 

Share | | |

Comments

Gary CascioAug 12 2013 02:55 PM

The answer to your question is…No! This program must be eliminated now.

Too many animals are needlessly killed by this program each year. Cases are coming to light that show WS employees with an apparent bloodlust for killing that are allowed to continue their employment after their disgusting behavior is exposed.

“The last word in ignorance is the man who says of an animal or plant, "What good is it?" (Aldo Leopold)

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Andrew Wetzler’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In