skip to main content

→ Top Stories:
Fracking
Safe Chemicals
Defending the Clean Air Act

Amy Mall’s Blog

Colorado: new public disservice ads about oil and gas

Amy Mall

Posted February 27, 2012 in Health and the Environment, The Media and the Environment

Tags:
, , , , ,
Share | | |

There is something unusual about the latest newspaper and radio advertisements from the Colorado Oil and Gas Association (COGA). While there is nothing new about the oil and gas industry spending money to convince Americans that fracking is safe, what sets the latest ads apart from typical industry propaganda is that the spokesperson in these ads is Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper.

In the radio ad, the Governor states that Colorado has not had "one instance of groundwater contamination associated with drilling and hydraulic fracturing" since Colorado enacted some new rules in 2008. It's true that Colorado's 2008 rules were a vast improvement compared to the previous rules.

But that doesn't mean that the rules are strong enough, that all fracking activities are safe in Colorado, or that human health and the environment are sufficiently protected. The 2008 rules were a step in the right direction, but did not go far enough to protect communities and their citizens from dangerous air pollution, groundwater contamination, and enormous amounts of toxic waste. 

In Colorado, archaic rules allow toxic oil and gas facilities to be as close as 150 feet to a child's bedroom window. These operations can be in someone's backyard and on their property without consent if a family does not own the rights to the oil and gas beneath its land--and most Coloradans do not.

The COGA ads tout the latest Colorado rule requiring disclosure of fracking chemicals. While disclosure is essential to preserve the public's right to know about chemicals in their community, and NRDC calls for nationwide disclosure of fracking chemicals for better regulation of this industry, disclosure is only one part of what's needed in a comprehensive regulatory structure to protect health and the environment from the dangers of fracking. Disclosure alone does not prevent drinking water contamination--rather it lets citizens know what chemicals might be in their drinking water after it has been contaminated. And many of the chemicals can still be kept secret by oil and gas companies.

The risks are real. From 2009-2011, there were more than a thousand spills related to oil and gas operations in Colorado--many of which impacted groundwater and/or surface water with potentially highly toxic materials. Last September, the Denver Post reported that four oil and gas companies alone had 350 spills in Colorado in less than two years. The Post highlighted one spill that contaminated groundwater with benzene--a known carcinogen. In 2010, a Las Animas County landowner found approximately 500 gallons of grayish brown murky water in his cistern that he believes is linked to nearby hydraulic fracturing. This family has extensive water testing documentation going back many years, verifying that their water was always clean and clear until the nearby fracking took place.

The newspaper ad states it is "brought to you as a public service," which makes it sound like a “public service announcement,” but this is misleading. While the Colorado Independent Ethics Commission decided that it is okay for elected officials to use their personal credibility and the position of their office to better educate the public on issues relating to their government position, in its decision, the Ethics Commissions used examples of public service announcements that discuss the importance of voting, filling out the census form, retrieving unclaimed property, and discouraging the illegal use of alcohol.

None of those examples promote one industry or mislead the public with a false sense of security about considerable and well-documented public health and environmental threats.

What's needed in Colorado and across the nation are strong rules to protect drinking water sources, clean air, healthy communities,and wildlands from the threats of oil and gas development at all stages of the extraction process. Ads that ignore, and appear to try to hide, very real risks are not only a disservice to the public, but will only prolong the public's distrust of the oil and gas industry and underscore the justifiable demands of communities to keep the industry out of their backyards and schoolyards. Instead of ads that appear to promote the oil and gas industry without acknowledging and addressing the risks, we hope Governor Hickenlooper will instead focus his energy on new and stronger protections for Colorado's clean water, clean air, and quality of life.

Share | | |

Comments

JonathanFeb 27 2012 05:54 PM

Funny how the NRDC would have you believe the oil and gas industry is going to invade and rape you in your sleep. Talk of 150 ft setbacks have nothing to do with this, and seeing how there are only 2 cases out of 47000 that have the 150 setback from an occupied building, one can write off that as fear mongering.

Additionally, what is this talk about "enormous" waste being produced? Clearly, the NRDC needs to get a grip on how much liquids actually flow within the industry. 1/20th of one percent was spilled from the industry in 2011. I don't care which way you slice it, that's pretty damn good for an industry, but the NRDC would have you running for the hills and despising industry.

You would also think that any post about spills would discuss remediation, but no, not anywhere. Any and all spills, whether they historically discovered from replacing old equipment to human error, require remediation.

The 2008 rules that went into effect are something to be celebrated, and it appears that the industry just wanted to let the public know that drilling and fracking incidents have not caused any contamination. Wellbore integrity is at it's highest, and good for them.

Dana PearsonFeb 28 2012 02:42 AM

Johnathan...you disgusting paid corporate shills make me want to puke. I'm saddened that the human race is littered with sellouts like you who are all too willing to sell our future for whatever corporations are paying you. You are a traitor to every young child hoping to grow up in a livable world. Shame...

Cheryl Feb 28 2012 03:40 AM

Jonathan..... well said! Thank you for pointing out some of the holes in Ms. Mall's fear mongering tactics. If you know anything at all about physics, you know that hydraulic fracturing that occurs 7,000 feet below the surface could in NO WAY impact our aquifers. As a fourth generation Colorado native land owner with mineral interests on some properties and not on others, I can assure you that the oil and gas industry has every reason to protect the land and environment and nothing at all to gain by destroying their credibility with the very people that they must depend on to explore for our fuel sources. I work with industry representatives regularly as a land owner and am well versed in how they operate. I get so ever-loving tired of listening to environmentalists flinging thier distortions at the wall, just hoping something will stick. If these people would educate themselves rather than limit their research to narrow propaganda that has no basis in fact, they would realize that the oil and gas industry and the land owners are working together to insure that impact to the land my grandfather homesteaded is minimal.

Comments are closed for this post.

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.

Feeds: Amy Mall’s blog

Feeds: Stay Plugged In