MWRD water permits: Illinois EPA goes AWOL in the war on green slime
In big-screen version of The Fugitive, the Tommy Lee Jones character’s gritty colleague Marshall Biggs asks, “If they can dye the river green today, why can't they dye it blue the other 364 days of the year?” The Marshall hit close to a pretty good question there. Except that instead of dying the River blue, a lot of us would like to put a stop to the pollution that fills it with smelly green muck on days quite unrelated to St. Patrick.
That desire led NRDC and a host of other environmental groups to file an appeal yesterday challenging the renewed Clean Water Act permits issued in December by Illinois EPA to the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District for its “big three” sewage treatment plants in the Chicago River system – Stickney, Calumet, and O’Brien (formerly Northside).
The permits are, sadly, yet another in a string of head-in-the-sand responses we’ve been seeing to one of the most serious problems facing our waterways, in Chicago and nationwide: the choking mats of algae being fueled by phosphorus and nitrogen dumped into the water by sewage treatment plants and other sources. While the MWRD permits do at least take the modest step of implementing a numeric limit on discharges of phosphorus – the pollutant most responsible for algal blooms in the Chicago region and downstream – that limit is not even close to strong enough to make a serious dent in the problem. Federal and state law required that Illinois EPA establish a permit limit on phosphorus through scientific analysis, but the Agency didn’t do that. Or do anything that even resembled that. Sad to say, the evident basis for phosphorus limit is that it’s the limit MWRD told the Agency it wanted.
Illinois is thus AWOL, once again, in the much larger national war on waterborne green slime that all regulators seem to recognize but few want to fight. US EPA has acknowledged for well over a decade that pollution from fertilizing chemicals like phosphorus is “one of the leading causes of water quality impairment in our Nation’s rivers, lakes and estuaries.” The problem is evident here in the Chicago region, where the Chicago River, and the Lower Des Plaines and Illinois Rivers just downstream, frequently are filled with green goo. It’s also evident as far downstream as the Gulf of Mexico, with the Chicago region (overwhelmingly dominated by MWRD’s sewage) has been identified as the largest single cause of the Gulf Dead Zone. The problem goes beyond the fact that the mats of green slime are ugly, smelly, and all-around icky. They also suck up so much dissolved oxygen from the water that other forms of aquatic life can’t survive. They muck up drinking water supplies, requiring that water supply agencies take costly measures to remove it. And sometimes they turn toxic, giving off “cyanotoxins” that are harmful to people, and known to kill pets pretty much every year.
US EPA has not done nearly enough to address the problem, which is why we recently sued and won concerning its failure to take action. However, the federal Agency at least took initiative to set some rough numeric benchmarks awhile back for the level of phosphorus that will protect against excessive algal and plant growth. Agency scientists surveyed the nation’s waters and came up with a maximum level of phosphorus that could be present in the water in various “ecoregions” without fueling algal blooms. Here in the Chicago area, that level was found to be .076 milligrams per liter (mg/L) in rivers and streams. Meanwhile, Wisconsin – which is far ahead of Illinois and most other states in this regard – did its own analysis and set a phosphorus level of 0.1 mg/L for its rivers and .075 for smaller streams, meaning that all of its dischargers (including sewage treatment plants) will have to have permit limits that ensure that very low level is not exceeded.
When Illinois EPA first proposed the new MWRD permits back in 2009 – yes, governments move at about that speed when they have a problem they don’t want to deal with – US EPA, to its credit, told Illinois EPA that it had better comply with legal requirements to come up with a science-based phosphorus limit that would prevent algal blooms.
Alas, however, that demand turned out to be empty saber rattling. Illinois EPA more or less let MWRD pick the limit it wanted, and US EPA let them get away with it. That limit – 1.0 mg/L – is ten times higher than the level established for rivers in Wisconsin (which is pretty similar to what would be right for neighboring Illinois), as well as the .076 mg/L criterion recommended for the region by US EPA.
We can be hopeful, at the very least, that since MWRD chose its own phosphorus limit, it will meet that limit – especially since the permit gives it a wholly unjustified ten years to comply. But even if it does so, it will not actually be in compliance with its permits. That's because in addition to the new numeric phosphorus limit, the MWRD permits (past and present) prohibit generally any discharge that contributes to unnatural levels of algal growth. We filed suit a few years back against MWRD for phosphorus discharges violating that general “narrative” condition, and are continuing to prosecute that lawsuit. Thus, while we hope the Pollution Control Board sees fit to grant our appeal and require Illinois EPA to impose a proper numeric limit on phosphorus, which would make enforcement of the law and protection of the region’s rivers a whole lot more straightforward, MWRD is going to have to fix its green slime problem regardless of what the Board decides.
North Shore Channel photo (top) by Susan D. Lannin
Lower Des Plaines River photo (middle) by Cynthia Skrukrud, Ph.D
I-55 Bridge phote (bottom) by Alan Burton, Ph.D